| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello there. -- Cat chi? 08:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Ah, the Fullmetal box, automail box, or just me playing with them in general? State Alchemist -talk- 20:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Two new issues here when you have a moment – apologies in advance if the second is something simple I've overlooked. Hope all well, David Kernow ( talk) 13:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Hello, fellow MADLAX fan. :) I've noticed you've put following into the template: "Someday, somewhere, anytime, anyplace." Is it a quote I don't recognize? :) More importantly, as you may have noticed, I have recently translated the Russian featured article about MADLAX, and now I'd really like to know your opinion. :) -- Koveras ☭ 17:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
hey, there's no bot reporting in vandalism-en-wp. Can you help? Thanks much, delldot | talk 14:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For reverting the vandalism on Kurdish literature. Çok Teşekürler :) Heja Helweda 04:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC) for Image:Spyware infestation.png. That is GREAT!! 68.39.174.238 03:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC) It's hard to promote something that had no supports whatsoever. Sorry. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 16:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC) You may be interested in this discussion Talk:Barnstar#Straw_poll. -- evrik ( talk) 15:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Do you play? Fr ed il Shadows of Darkness 21:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I saw you put this up for deletion over at the commons. The source is very clearly given as NARA and that picture is available on the microfiche of his service record...I have personaly seen it since I work for that agency. I would suggest removing the deletion tag from the image its public domain by every definition as an image owned by a U.S. government agency, - Husnock 06:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Mind restoring the default colors (I cant due to protection). It was lost in a revert perhaps. [1]. If people want any color, they can set it. Ice blue was the most widely used color at the time of the templates creation, thats why I made it the default (and its a nice color :P). Thanks. -- Cat chi? 23:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
İyi günler attığım email geldi mi ? Buluşma hakkında kontak kurmaya çalışmıştım. -- Nerval 13:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC) There are several issues that the WikiProject needs to address.
Sincerely, -- evrik ( talk) 02:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
If I may butt in on this one... subsuming Islam under "religion" because it's "too specific" strikes me as analogous to subsuming baseball, basketball, football, etc. under "sports," or chemistry, physics, astronomy, psychology, etc. under "science." We don't do that because expertise in one of those areas doesn't necessarily translate into the other areas. Similarly, expertise concerning Islam does not automatically imply expertise regarding Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, etc. So "Islam" is appropriate as a category, and an "Islamic barnstar" (or Jewish, Buddhist, etc.) is an appropriate recognition for specific expertise and Wiki contributions. Hope this is helpful. -- Rob C (Alarob) 18:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC) OK. I'd be interested to know on what grounds you disagree. -- Rob C (Alarob) 16:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't find any of these reasons convincing. Here is why:
I get the prospective problems, but do not see them as grounds for prohibition. That's where I'm coming from. -- Rob C (Alarob) 17:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
On looking at the list of barnstars I see that categories are indeed very broad (e.g.., there is no "physics" or "football" barnstar). I've been proceeding on the assumption that your position is that any "Islam" award should be prohibited. But maybe that's not what you're saying. If you're proposing that there should be a barnstar for "Religion" to go with the ones for history, culture, math/science, etc., then I'm with you 100%. I also agree that at that level there is no need for a barnstar pertaining to a specific religion. Moreover, a broad-category barnstar on religion would recognize editors who work on more than one. An "Islam" award should be handled at the WikiProject level or below. -- Rob C (Alarob) 18:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:Oh My Goddess TV DVD Vol 09.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC) I dislike what is happening. There is no reason for this. And where is this discussion? -- Cat chi? 07:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Someone has re-created User talk:Cool Cat/Archive/2005/02/. - Royalguard11( Talk· Desk· Review Me!) 01:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:United_(ENT_episode).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jg Saavik.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Durin 15:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC) If you make a list of the Star Trek images you tagged needing fair use rationales then I will go through them and review them the best I can. Matthew Fenton ( talk · contribs · count · email) 14:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Jelly Beans for you.. I am being weird today and I decided to give some to a Random Person to hopefully make people a little bit happier.. Enjoy these Jelly Beans.. (I Like the Lime ones) An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Please take a look Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Regards. Must TC 18:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:Gan-chan with Belldandy.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. ( Talk) 11:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Can you provide a source and license for this? -- Cat chi? 21:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
{{ CommonsImageSummary}} {{ PD-USGov-Military}}
A new (and overdue) Greek and Turkish cooperation and notification board has been launched here. Stop by, have a look and sound off! Cheers! Baristarim 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC) User:Durin has indicated his aims of targeting images on Starfleet ranks, again one of the foolish people who believes Paramount has a copyright on three circles in a row or two stripes on top of one another. This guy is very determined and could do SERIOUS damage to the Starfleet ranks article. In fact, I'm sure he would take great pleasure from doing so since I have been so deeply involved with the article. As I am deployed, I may not be here to defend and protect this artcle which we have worked so hard to create. Defend this article with your Wiki-Life! I have sent a request to the Nogri to visit Durin's house but they have not responded (busy doing other things). - Husnock 18:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC) I got it. Some joker also just put up the conjectured ranks article for deletion. I think it might be bad faith...since the "this article's entry" page is completely blank and doesnt give a reason for a VfD (at least, not yet). - Husnock 11:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm doing what I can to fix this...no need to fire all phasers snce we clearly dont want the main rank article deleted. - Husnock 12:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) User:Coolcat/P142: do you still need it? `' mikkanarxi 17:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I saw your note on the deletion page. I would urge you to stick around despite the occasional aggravations that occur around here. Take a break if you need it but I hope you'll return and resume contributing. Newyorkbrad 17:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello there. -- Cat chi? 08:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Ah, the Fullmetal box, automail box, or just me playing with them in general? State Alchemist -talk- 20:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Two new issues here when you have a moment – apologies in advance if the second is something simple I've overlooked. Hope all well, David Kernow ( talk) 13:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Hello, fellow MADLAX fan. :) I've noticed you've put following into the template: "Someday, somewhere, anytime, anyplace." Is it a quote I don't recognize? :) More importantly, as you may have noticed, I have recently translated the Russian featured article about MADLAX, and now I'd really like to know your opinion. :) -- Koveras ☭ 17:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
hey, there's no bot reporting in vandalism-en-wp. Can you help? Thanks much, delldot | talk 14:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For reverting the vandalism on Kurdish literature. Çok Teşekürler :) Heja Helweda 04:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC) for Image:Spyware infestation.png. That is GREAT!! 68.39.174.238 03:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC) It's hard to promote something that had no supports whatsoever. Sorry. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 16:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC) You may be interested in this discussion Talk:Barnstar#Straw_poll. -- evrik ( talk) 15:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Do you play? Fr ed il Shadows of Darkness 21:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I saw you put this up for deletion over at the commons. The source is very clearly given as NARA and that picture is available on the microfiche of his service record...I have personaly seen it since I work for that agency. I would suggest removing the deletion tag from the image its public domain by every definition as an image owned by a U.S. government agency, - Husnock 06:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Mind restoring the default colors (I cant due to protection). It was lost in a revert perhaps. [1]. If people want any color, they can set it. Ice blue was the most widely used color at the time of the templates creation, thats why I made it the default (and its a nice color :P). Thanks. -- Cat chi? 23:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
İyi günler attığım email geldi mi ? Buluşma hakkında kontak kurmaya çalışmıştım. -- Nerval 13:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC) There are several issues that the WikiProject needs to address.
Sincerely, -- evrik ( talk) 02:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
If I may butt in on this one... subsuming Islam under "religion" because it's "too specific" strikes me as analogous to subsuming baseball, basketball, football, etc. under "sports," or chemistry, physics, astronomy, psychology, etc. under "science." We don't do that because expertise in one of those areas doesn't necessarily translate into the other areas. Similarly, expertise concerning Islam does not automatically imply expertise regarding Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, etc. So "Islam" is appropriate as a category, and an "Islamic barnstar" (or Jewish, Buddhist, etc.) is an appropriate recognition for specific expertise and Wiki contributions. Hope this is helpful. -- Rob C (Alarob) 18:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC) OK. I'd be interested to know on what grounds you disagree. -- Rob C (Alarob) 16:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't find any of these reasons convincing. Here is why:
I get the prospective problems, but do not see them as grounds for prohibition. That's where I'm coming from. -- Rob C (Alarob) 17:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
On looking at the list of barnstars I see that categories are indeed very broad (e.g.., there is no "physics" or "football" barnstar). I've been proceeding on the assumption that your position is that any "Islam" award should be prohibited. But maybe that's not what you're saying. If you're proposing that there should be a barnstar for "Religion" to go with the ones for history, culture, math/science, etc., then I'm with you 100%. I also agree that at that level there is no need for a barnstar pertaining to a specific religion. Moreover, a broad-category barnstar on religion would recognize editors who work on more than one. An "Islam" award should be handled at the WikiProject level or below. -- Rob C (Alarob) 18:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:Oh My Goddess TV DVD Vol 09.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC) I dislike what is happening. There is no reason for this. And where is this discussion? -- Cat chi? 07:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Someone has re-created User talk:Cool Cat/Archive/2005/02/. - Royalguard11( Talk· Desk· Review Me!) 01:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:United_(ENT_episode).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jg Saavik.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Durin 15:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC) If you make a list of the Star Trek images you tagged needing fair use rationales then I will go through them and review them the best I can. Matthew Fenton ( talk · contribs · count · email) 14:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Jelly Beans for you.. I am being weird today and I decided to give some to a Random Person to hopefully make people a little bit happier.. Enjoy these Jelly Beans.. (I Like the Lime ones) An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Please take a look Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Regards. Must TC 18:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:Gan-chan with Belldandy.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. ( Talk) 11:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Can you provide a source and license for this? -- Cat chi? 21:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
{{ CommonsImageSummary}} {{ PD-USGov-Military}}
A new (and overdue) Greek and Turkish cooperation and notification board has been launched here. Stop by, have a look and sound off! Cheers! Baristarim 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC) User:Durin has indicated his aims of targeting images on Starfleet ranks, again one of the foolish people who believes Paramount has a copyright on three circles in a row or two stripes on top of one another. This guy is very determined and could do SERIOUS damage to the Starfleet ranks article. In fact, I'm sure he would take great pleasure from doing so since I have been so deeply involved with the article. As I am deployed, I may not be here to defend and protect this artcle which we have worked so hard to create. Defend this article with your Wiki-Life! I have sent a request to the Nogri to visit Durin's house but they have not responded (busy doing other things). - Husnock 18:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC) I got it. Some joker also just put up the conjectured ranks article for deletion. I think it might be bad faith...since the "this article's entry" page is completely blank and doesnt give a reason for a VfD (at least, not yet). - Husnock 11:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm doing what I can to fix this...no need to fire all phasers snce we clearly dont want the main rank article deleted. - Husnock 12:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) User:Coolcat/P142: do you still need it? `' mikkanarxi 17:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I saw your note on the deletion page. I would urge you to stick around despite the occasional aggravations that occur around here. Take a break if you need it but I hope you'll return and resume contributing. Newyorkbrad 17:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
|