Archive of talk discussion:
Hi, I think you may have accidentally closed this instead of !voting, as your close does not reflect the consensus and reads as a supervote, and anyway non-admins are strongly discouraged from closing any XFDs that are possibly controversial (i.e. anything where there is disagreement). Could you please revert and allow an admin to close/relist? Thank you. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you relisted two articles for deletion today including one which had only keep votes. The relisting comment for Red Light Management was "there not been clear justification that no source brought forward validate CORP". That suggests to me you are trying to second-guess what seems to be a pretty clear consensus, rather than trying to generate greater discussion or a more clear consensus as described at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Administrator_instructions#Relisting_AfDs
May I suggest that as a relatively new user, you might want to participate in more deletion discussions before taking on tasks like closing or relisting? Oblivy ( talk) 06:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to return to your talk page again but as the AfD is closed this seems to be the right place.
When I asked about
WP:BEFORE searches, I was suggesting you might not have done enough work to form an opinion on non-notability before bringing an AfD, The Loyola cite was on the 1st page of Google Scholar results for Nicor Energy, strongly suggesting your before searches were inadequate (and if not, you could have said why you considered and rejected the sources).
I appreciate you took my comment seriously, but based on the discussions above with me and with @
JoelleJay, I was surprised to see you using closing tools again. I think the proper response was to add a comment withdrawing the AfD, and then let an admin or more experienced user consider the close.
Oblivy (
talk)
02:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI - After the PROD was reverted I started an AfD. David notMD ( talk) 03:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Power-to-heat into
Power-to-X. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
User:बिनोद थारू, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:बिनोद थारू (2nd nomination) and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:बिनोद थारू during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
17:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a poll for proposed deletions? The article has some independent references, but for me the bigger issue is notability. There are lots of robotics startups, it's not clear why this one should be in an encyclopedia. Peter.corke ( talk) 23:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I notice in your recent edits multiple occasions where you redirect ann article to another one, marking it as a "merge", but actually not adding anything to the merge target (and several times actually removing content. In at least one case ( Economics and Human Biology) you basically deleted this article on a notable journal. This is all very misleading, please stop and correct this. -- Randykitty ( talk) 09:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello again, I just wanted to check if you meant to use Template:Primary sources on Jahrome Brown? The reason I ask is that to the best of my knowledge, that particular template is for articles that use multiple primary sources whereas that article is a stub article about a living person with subject-specific notability because he plays in a professional sports league that currently uses one primary source and not multiple primary sources. With some of these athlete biographies its pretty much a given that they'll start off as a single source stub and editors will expand the article incrementally as his career progresses. Do you mind either removing the primary sources tag and adding a more relevant tag or perhaps just reverting your edit? I'll leave it to your editorial judgement, thanks again. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Would you care to elaborate on this talk page edit summary? Specifically, I'd like to know which part of my comment you believe was 'misinformation'? my understanding of WP:AFD is that its purpose is to discuss whether enough independent reliable sources exist to warrant a standalone article. Could you please explain how I misinformed you? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey there, would you mind restoring the messages that I left for you earlier on this talk page? You know, the ones that you labelled as 'libel' and 'misinformation' in your edit summaries. This time, could you please keep them live for at least seven days so that other editors have a chance to read them? Thanks. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 17:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Cautiously editing or removing another editor's comments is sometimes allowed, but normally you should stop if there is any objection. If you make anything more than minor changes, it is good practice to leave a short explanatory note such as "[potential libel removed by बिनोद थारू ( talk) 20:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)]".
Hi, you deleted my previous talk page message where I asked you to clarify your contributions to LGBT reproduction where you wrote, "many gay transgender men choose to freeze their eggs before transitioning" I found your edit a bit confusing and I find terms like trans men instead of trans people somewhat insensitive and ill-informed. Also? Since when do males produce eggs? Surely one has to ovulate to produce an egg? Or did I miss a biology lesson? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
बिनोद थारू,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
20:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
SQL PL. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Others have previously cautioned you about using article merges as a method of back-door deletion. Now you deleted all the content in our
SQL PL article but did not merge any of it into
IBM Db2. You claimed, however, that you did this on the two talk pages:
Talk:SQL PL and
Talk:IBM Db2.
See Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 00:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello again, I thought I would just drop by to wish you a happy New Year and glean some more of your expert Wikipedia knowledge from you if I may? You are afterall so wonderfully prolific on WP and the way you do more in a day than I do in a year is really inspiring to me. Anyways, I was just wondering why you prodded Nice (app)? Surely, that's an AFD candidate if ever there was one. No? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 18:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. A tag has been placed on Ppatel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NebY ( talk) 14:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Archive of talk discussion:
Hi, I think you may have accidentally closed this instead of !voting, as your close does not reflect the consensus and reads as a supervote, and anyway non-admins are strongly discouraged from closing any XFDs that are possibly controversial (i.e. anything where there is disagreement). Could you please revert and allow an admin to close/relist? Thank you. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you relisted two articles for deletion today including one which had only keep votes. The relisting comment for Red Light Management was "there not been clear justification that no source brought forward validate CORP". That suggests to me you are trying to second-guess what seems to be a pretty clear consensus, rather than trying to generate greater discussion or a more clear consensus as described at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Administrator_instructions#Relisting_AfDs
May I suggest that as a relatively new user, you might want to participate in more deletion discussions before taking on tasks like closing or relisting? Oblivy ( talk) 06:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to return to your talk page again but as the AfD is closed this seems to be the right place.
When I asked about
WP:BEFORE searches, I was suggesting you might not have done enough work to form an opinion on non-notability before bringing an AfD, The Loyola cite was on the 1st page of Google Scholar results for Nicor Energy, strongly suggesting your before searches were inadequate (and if not, you could have said why you considered and rejected the sources).
I appreciate you took my comment seriously, but based on the discussions above with me and with @
JoelleJay, I was surprised to see you using closing tools again. I think the proper response was to add a comment withdrawing the AfD, and then let an admin or more experienced user consider the close.
Oblivy (
talk)
02:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI - After the PROD was reverted I started an AfD. David notMD ( talk) 03:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Power-to-heat into
Power-to-X. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
User:बिनोद थारू, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:बिनोद थारू (2nd nomination) and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:बिनोद थारू during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
17:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a poll for proposed deletions? The article has some independent references, but for me the bigger issue is notability. There are lots of robotics startups, it's not clear why this one should be in an encyclopedia. Peter.corke ( talk) 23:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I notice in your recent edits multiple occasions where you redirect ann article to another one, marking it as a "merge", but actually not adding anything to the merge target (and several times actually removing content. In at least one case ( Economics and Human Biology) you basically deleted this article on a notable journal. This is all very misleading, please stop and correct this. -- Randykitty ( talk) 09:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello again, I just wanted to check if you meant to use Template:Primary sources on Jahrome Brown? The reason I ask is that to the best of my knowledge, that particular template is for articles that use multiple primary sources whereas that article is a stub article about a living person with subject-specific notability because he plays in a professional sports league that currently uses one primary source and not multiple primary sources. With some of these athlete biographies its pretty much a given that they'll start off as a single source stub and editors will expand the article incrementally as his career progresses. Do you mind either removing the primary sources tag and adding a more relevant tag or perhaps just reverting your edit? I'll leave it to your editorial judgement, thanks again. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Would you care to elaborate on this talk page edit summary? Specifically, I'd like to know which part of my comment you believe was 'misinformation'? my understanding of WP:AFD is that its purpose is to discuss whether enough independent reliable sources exist to warrant a standalone article. Could you please explain how I misinformed you? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey there, would you mind restoring the messages that I left for you earlier on this talk page? You know, the ones that you labelled as 'libel' and 'misinformation' in your edit summaries. This time, could you please keep them live for at least seven days so that other editors have a chance to read them? Thanks. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 17:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Cautiously editing or removing another editor's comments is sometimes allowed, but normally you should stop if there is any objection. If you make anything more than minor changes, it is good practice to leave a short explanatory note such as "[potential libel removed by बिनोद थारू ( talk) 20:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)]".
Hi, you deleted my previous talk page message where I asked you to clarify your contributions to LGBT reproduction where you wrote, "many gay transgender men choose to freeze their eggs before transitioning" I found your edit a bit confusing and I find terms like trans men instead of trans people somewhat insensitive and ill-informed. Also? Since when do males produce eggs? Surely one has to ovulate to produce an egg? Or did I miss a biology lesson? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
बिनोद थारू,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
20:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
SQL PL. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Others have previously cautioned you about using article merges as a method of back-door deletion. Now you deleted all the content in our
SQL PL article but did not merge any of it into
IBM Db2. You claimed, however, that you did this on the two talk pages:
Talk:SQL PL and
Talk:IBM Db2.
See Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 00:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello again, I thought I would just drop by to wish you a happy New Year and glean some more of your expert Wikipedia knowledge from you if I may? You are afterall so wonderfully prolific on WP and the way you do more in a day than I do in a year is really inspiring to me. Anyways, I was just wondering why you prodded Nice (app)? Surely, that's an AFD candidate if ever there was one. No? 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 18:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. A tag has been placed on Ppatel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NebY ( talk) 14:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)