Hello, टीम निकी मिनाज, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — IB [ Poke ] 09:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "टीम निकी मिनाज", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing
this form, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you. As your name translates to "Team Nicki Minaj" this implies use by multiple people. Please act accordingly.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edits to African Americans. I don't know what you were thinking, but American Renaissance is never a reliable source. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Toronto has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. –
Davey2010
Talk
22:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Toronto. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey2010 Talk 00:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and explain why you believe your wording is better than the one you're replacing, Thanks – Davey2010 Talk 00:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:टीम_निकी_मिनाज reported by User:Johnny Au (Result: ). Thank you.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding material to the article that fails verification, meaning the source doesn't support what you write. Please read WP:No original research, especially the section titled "Using sources", which says (in part):
- Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.
Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 04:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Spaceman Spiff 08:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- It also appears that this isn't the only article you're edit warring on. If you continue this behavior after your block expires then your next block will be of a longer duration. — Spaceman Spiff 08:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:टीम_निकी_मिनाज reported by User:Johnny Au (Result: ). Thank you.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
16:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Toronto. –
Davey2010
Talk
14:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Persistent edits to the Drake article
Please find that your persistent edits to the Drake article are against Wikipedia edit policy, as you are consistently choosing to revert to your revision of the article, without preserving the value that other editors have added to the article in itself. Please find that this is detrimental to the article, and can make you eligible for being blocked from editing without further warning. – PsychopathicAssassin Talk 14:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know I've withdrawn my report because not all diffs listed where problematic and your edits had gone beyond 27th which conveniently Twinkle didn't pick up on,
Infuture instead of readding the content I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and discuss it first, If you don't you could be blocked,
Thank you. –
Davey2010
Talk
17:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Drake (musician). Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed 17:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Drake (musician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dane2007 (
talk)
05:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.
Sro23 (
talk)
21:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Still trying to use American Renaissance as a source? Try it again and I'll ask for you to be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
African Americans. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as
trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to
appeal this block – read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of
your user talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
04:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, टीम निकी मिनाज. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, टीम निकी मिनाज, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — IB [ Poke ] 09:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "टीम निकी मिनाज", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing
this form, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you. As your name translates to "Team Nicki Minaj" this implies use by multiple people. Please act accordingly.
Lectonar (
talk)
08:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edits to African Americans. I don't know what you were thinking, but American Renaissance is never a reliable source. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 05:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Toronto has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. –
Davey2010
Talk
22:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Toronto. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey2010 Talk 00:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and explain why you believe your wording is better than the one you're replacing, Thanks – Davey2010 Talk 00:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:टीम_निकी_मिनाज reported by User:Johnny Au (Result: ). Thank you.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding material to the article that fails verification, meaning the source doesn't support what you write. Please read WP:No original research, especially the section titled "Using sources", which says (in part):
- Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.
Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 04:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Spaceman Spiff 08:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- It also appears that this isn't the only article you're edit warring on. If you continue this behavior after your block expires then your next block will be of a longer duration. — Spaceman Spiff 08:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:टीम_निकी_मिनाज reported by User:Johnny Au (Result: ). Thank you.
Johnny Au (
talk/
contributions)
16:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Toronto. –
Davey2010
Talk
14:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Persistent edits to the Drake article
Please find that your persistent edits to the Drake article are against Wikipedia edit policy, as you are consistently choosing to revert to your revision of the article, without preserving the value that other editors have added to the article in itself. Please find that this is detrimental to the article, and can make you eligible for being blocked from editing without further warning. – PsychopathicAssassin Talk 14:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know I've withdrawn my report because not all diffs listed where problematic and your edits had gone beyond 27th which conveniently Twinkle didn't pick up on,
Infuture instead of readding the content I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and discuss it first, If you don't you could be blocked,
Thank you. –
Davey2010
Talk
17:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Drake (musician). Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed 17:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Drake (musician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dane2007 (
talk)
05:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.
Sro23 (
talk)
21:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Still trying to use American Renaissance as a source? Try it again and I'll ask for you to be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
African Americans. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as
trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to
appeal this block – read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of
your user talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
04:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, टीम निकी मिनाज. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)