![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hi Ivanacccp! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Bsherr ( talk) 18:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
List of most-liked tweets—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
L293D (
☎ •
✎) 21:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ivanacccp! When adding tweets to these tables could you please include the 'access-date' parameter as well i.e. the date you add a tweet to the list? That way when I'm doing cleanup on the articles, if any info is missing I can use that date to go back to the page history and find when it was added and by whom, or search Google around that time for refs to support the tweets. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 22:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I want to point it out the new Twitter feature introduced in the last 1-2 months regarding the number of retweets displayed. So basically the new counter of retweets includes both retweets and retweets with comments (the "quotes"). The label has changed from "retweets" to "retweets and comments" and if you click it, you will see two columns displaying the number of retweets with comments and the number of retweets without comments. Before this new implementation, the Twitter counter included the retweets only (without the quotes). Here the article about this https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21256586/twitter-ios-quote-tweets-retweets-with-comments#:~:text=The%20new%20feature%20organizes%20all,of%20retweets%20with%20no%20comment. Now I see that the wikipedia article about the list of the most retweeted tweets reports the new number that combines retweets and quotes but I think it would be better to go back to report the actual number of retweets that is in fact the number that counts for the "most retweeted tweets of the year" list disclosed by Twitter every year. Euphorian95 ( talk) 15:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
You got ahead of me :D MKgaspari ( talk) 06:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
I mean it’s not wrong though. On KOMCA he’s listed as composer which is the same as producer. So stop editing that he didn’t produce when he actually did and is credited for it on KOMCA( korean music copyright association) which is an official thing. Purplebag54 ( talk) 04:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Article: Most subscribed YouTube music artists.
Why did you undo me? Blackpink is one group so you use "is". Maybe check my edit desc before you rv. SmallPotato talk 13:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Re: onehallyu.com KOMCA Master list 2020. It lists V with 12 copyrights co.composed co written songs. Jungkook has 10 Magic Shop was co composed and co written by JH, JK, RM and Suga Love is not Over co composed and co written by Jin and JK. You were quick to update JK's page.
Your failure to acknowledge V's talents and achievements is bias. He has made the Hall of Fame for Starmometer as Asian Heartthrob 3 years in a row. You can check their website. He. has countless records on Twitter, Twipple, Weibo, Baidu, Instagram, YT, China's Super Topic, World's Handsome Man titles, Soundcloud, ITunes, Spotify, Sold out King of everything he wears from luxury items to lip balm. Yet you as a representative of Wikipedia choose not to acknowledge any of it. News of V beating Adele and Psy's record is everywhere. I've donated to Wikipedia on the belief that all articles were accurate unbiased and up-to-date. 122.57.70.169 ( talk) 14:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Ïvana! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
When you have the time, I think you should go ahead and expand the list to 30 entries to match the most-retweeted list. Ik these lists are your forte so I figured it was better if you located the additional 10. I'll help with the footnotes+refs as needed. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 19:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
If/when you have the time, could you help locate a k-article talking about BTS extending their most daesangs record with their 2020 MMA/mama wins? I've been searching thru all articles since 2020 mama night come forward on Naver. Ik the TFMA win was their 52nd daesang overall so I'm hoping to find one that mentions all of this, or ones that mention either point. So far it's mostly been pieces talking about how many consecutive mma/mama sweeps they've done. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of K-pop Hot 100 number ones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most-streamed artists on Spotify, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, just always remember no matter what your intentions, don't ever let anyone drag you down into an edit war because WP:3RR says 3 reverts and you're blocked. Never respond in kind. I just reported him to an admin. Also, I had left it down to just the logo for each flagship product, not each member of the series. — Smuckola (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Iavana. What's your source for the most-streamed artists on Spotify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soheilpro ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
That was a nice edit you made last week on the BTS lyrical themes section. Have you given any thought to that section as to putting it into chronological order of themes or to organize it by subjects. Currently it looks like a 'selected' themes section collected by various editors at different times. Here is one article, not concentrating themes alone, which takes a chronological approach [1]. Any thoughts about enhancing the BTS lyrical themes section? ErnestKrause ( talk) 15:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ivana, just let you know that I FOUND a reliable source to the information I added earlier which you deemed unreliable. Sometimes it's better to wait for better sources than simply revert edits. Now, it's under a Forbes source, which is reliable. Kindest regards. -- CoryGlee ( talk) 20:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey would you mind archiving these urls for me? I left them archiving since early this morning when the charts updated (Wayback said it would take over 800 mins to save), but when I came back the pages hadn't moved anywhere even after refreshing (or the save page crashed+showed the "Internal Server Error" msg). I already saved them on archive.today so it's just Wayback that is the problem and I don't want to lose the sales data.
Hi there, you reverted my edits and said, "Records in this article are viewed as a whole, they're not divided by girl groups/boy groups/male soloists/female soloists/etc otherwise we would never stop"
I have two questions:
Thank you. -ink&fables «talk» 10:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
There's discussion of your action of which you may have been involved. See Talk:Music programs of South Korea 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 02:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
You know we Russians have a saying: "do not dig a grave for another, you yourself will fall into it". So, your parents (fans of male Russian names and culture) probably knew this. But you do seem to be and therefore are doing what you shouldn't. I could play this stupid game with you further, I could undo all your korea shit edits on far-fetched pretexts as you do with mine edits. But instead, I will appeal to the administration. 109.254.254.156 ( talk) 00:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey Ïvana, just wanted to let you know to contact the oversight team when removing personal information like you did here so that they can suppress, or 'oversight', it. This makes the information inaccessible from the page history, and prevents others from seeing it. I took care of it in this case. You can email the oversight team at Special:EmailUser/Oversight or make a request on irc at #wikipedia-en-revdel connect. Happy editing. EN- Jungwon 15:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ïvana,
I write to you, because you have been editing the Slavoj Žižek Page. I'm editing the Zizek bibliography. Here I also mention the op-ed publications on Russia Today. There is a WP editor who holds the opinion, that these edits violate Wikipedia:RSP. I can't see how this is applicable. You can read my argument here. The editor doesn't respond.
If you have an interest in the subject, I would be happy, if you could contribute your opinion. If you don't have an interest, maybe you know someone else who might have?
With kind regards.
-- Quin451 ( talk) 13:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Certification updates are out already, unless you prefer to wait for the website. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 00:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I posted a talk, but you seemed active so I wanted to reach out to you.
I think we should edit the page to nor merge repackages with the original release. I can’t think of a reason we would merge them on the wikipedia page meant to reflect the charts when said charts have them listed separately and don’t merge them. It feels inconsistent and inaccurate. Jayb.rd98 ( talk) 19:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
"what is the criteria to choose achievements? weekly digital points from random years are unnecessary (why not monthly? why not all years? plus the source should refer to that specific week) and annual highest points are already published"
1. It is not from random years. Gaon Music Chart started publishing digital points in 2018 when they reformed the chart.
2. the criteria for weekly instead monthly. Music charts relevance are primarily for weekly data. Someone can read the article to know what song was the No. 1 in determined week, but it is like that number one with 25M points has the same weight as the one that reached number one with 60M points.
3. "plus the source should refer to that specific week". nope, it depends on the info. as like articles of Korean tv series, viewership is not specified. You need go to Nielseen Korea website and seach for determined date. The same here because it is how Korean industry publish their data.
4. "annual highest points are already published". ???? annual is not the same as weekly highest points.
I know I won't convince you, because you don't even tried to open a discussion on article's talk page before delete everything. But I'm here just to enlight you that I wouldn't just put a rondom shit in a Wiki page. I'm here 4 years, and I know how things work. Bominsky ( talk) 00:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
"You don't see points published in the Billboard Hot 100 chart". No comparison, since Billboard does not publish they points on charts like Gaon does, and even if Billboard starts including points on Hot 100, it would be irrelevant since they also publish numbers for Streaming and Digital Sales, something that Gaon does not do. On Gaon, the weekly points are the only way someone can know how big is a song in the chart. Plus there are songs in the top 10 year-end, that can't even had reached the top 10 of highest weekly points, because most of them chart in the middle (of the chart) for almost an entire year.
Average people will never know that, because most of them think that what is on Wikipedia is sufficient. They probably will never search for it on Gaon website, and the annual list will make them believe that all that songs hit so big, when they not.
"I don't have to open a discussion to defend keeping everything the way it has been for years". ???? that's not the policy here. You just don't delete something to maintain it the way it has been for years. There are many motives (wiki rules) the community here delete without discussion, like misinsformation, neutrality, sources not reliable, too much information as well... but not on expand an article to keep it the way it had been for years lol. Articles on Wiki are supossed to be improvement and expanded.
Anyway, I understand your point, and I won't try to change it, maybe in the future someone try introduce it again. Talk page is supposed to be used. Use it.
Bominsky ( talk) 05:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am kinda new with editing Wikipedia pages, and i had a question about the last edit you made on the article List of most-streamed artists on Spotify. You changed something from the source i found, but i don't know what and why exactly. Can you explain that to me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by An o niem ja ( talk • contribs) 20:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
You said in your rollback edit that the whole table needs to be updated in one go, and that was what i did, but you still rollbacked it (you only rounded the numbers down in your recent edit). But why — Preceding unsigned comment added by An o niem ja ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Okay i get it. Thanks! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
An o niem ja (
talk •
contribs) 14:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I did not add any information to that article. I was recent changes patrolling and undid someone elses deletion, thought it was deletion of content without explanation (blanking). If I got a recent patrol change incorrect, happy to be advised :) Thanks. Such-change47 ( talk) 12:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not understanding the edits you're making to the large group of set index articles of Korean names, like what you have done at Sung-bin. Per WP:SIA#Common selection criteria, particularly the List of notable items section, there is no requirement for the subjects to have an article. ✗ plicit 02:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Han (name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zhang Han and Han Fu.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Since I am have made no edits on the Jimin article, I am prepared to archive and close the talk page discussion there as having no consensus for adding the edit under discussion. ErnestKrause ( talk) 20:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey could you archive this week's update of the GSC? Wayback has been giving me a lot for trouble this past week and I've been unable to save the GSC url in particular, even though I've tried multiple times since Wednesday to do so. WB always either says it'll take several hours to save, or that the archive has been saved x amount of minutes ago, but when I search for it the last-saved archive is May 25 only. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 01:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
the links in the article. List of most-streamed songs on Spotify they are not complete and they are also very poorly added Tirso Gutiérrez ( talk) 14:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
It is also written in Wikipedia, and I will write the text here that does not need to be reviewed. Plz don't start an editorial dispute.
Seonghan of Silla - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Seonghan_of_Silla According to some theories, he was a son of Kim Alji, or a seventh-generation descendant of Xiongnu through the Han Dynasty general Jin Midi. 59.16.47.85 ( talk) 00:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
I’m unsure if you were a participant when this was being settled, but Hanbin of tempest belongs on that page and has been settled over a year ago. Admins has to get involved to stop people from continuing to remove him, it was determined that he was acceptable to be there and his article is currently in the process of being translated from Vietnamese.
If you could respect the decision that was made, that would be great, otherwise I will continue to have to fix it when you choose to not respect that decision Thank you very much Jayb.rd98 ( talk) Jayb.rd98 ( talk) 20:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ivana !! I have been checking out Butter's Page recently and i came across the controversy section which includes the infamous billboard article and uses it as a source. it has been almost a year since this incident happened but frankly it still irks me that this section is still included and somehow hasn't been removed despite everything.
I don't know if you were on twitter at that time or you have an idea about the matter, but the user who edited the page and added this section had a twitter page and they had numerous hate tweets against bts and armys and their account is filled with content targeted towards bts (ironically, just like the tweets included in the billboard article). so it is clear that the editing was with ill-intentions. i was looking through the bts talk page and i saw a discussion between you and him about that edit and i noticed that no one brought up the fact that he is a person who clearly hates bts and added that part of the article on purpose, so i thought that you did not know about this. i can link the tweets if you wish
And yeah, i found out that somehow his page still exists and he is still here doing edits daily.
I know it's been almost a year since this incident happened but i've been thinking alot about this lately; i am no expert, but isn't this considered a sort of vandalism taking into regard his intentions and the fact that he admitted adding the section because of his hatred? therefore shouldn't he be banned from being on here?
I think it's kinda disappointing that such people have the authority to change and have an input in public material like wiki pages when they are clearly not qualified to be one, again, i am no expert and i don't know wikipedia's policies regarding such things
This might sound like some kind of vent. but i really would like to hear your opinion on this !
Hope you have a nice day and thank you for you hard work on here <3
Sanarghzl ( talk) Sanarghzl ( talk) 15:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hy Brasil (
talk) 19:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi wouldn't it be better to update sales based on the new circle/ gaon retail album chart? The chart was updated in 2022 and now shows actual global sales and not just shipments like from the gaon/circle album chart. The Korea Herald published an article about it "Gaon Chart aims to become global kpop chart with new name" Simsky12 ( talk) 15:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey Ivana, I just wanted to ask what you would consider proper resources for both of the Kim’s who hail from the Gwangsan Kim clan. I saw in the edit history that people have linked videographic sources of them themselves saying that they are in fact descendants of the Gwangsan Kim clan, but their addition to the list of known descendants keeps getting removed by both yourself and others. What would be sufficient in order to keep their name in the list? Thank you for your time!
Also, if this comes across as rude, it is not intentional and I apologize if I come across that way. DC11961 ( talk) 02:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ivana, my username here at Wikipedia is Nadiaminki, my question is why are you removing my additions to the article when I've cited them with different sources, in English and Korean about Kim Mingyu and Kim Hongjoong and insisting on the "no notability in the article"? I don't want to be deemed rude, English isn't my first language or my mother tongue. What requirements I'm missing so both of them can stay on the Gwangsan Kim clan wiki? Thank you for your attention and time! Have a nice day. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nadiaminki (
talk •
contribs) 20:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that BTS has had more than 5 noms at the Grammy's over the years; are you sure you want to put it that way in the lead as you did yesterday? ErnestKrause ( talk) 15:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I accidentally reverted your revert on So-won while looking at the notification, but I changed it back. I apologize if you saw that version. I looked at the page history after that, and I wasn’t aware that I wasn’t supposed to add group members who didn’t have their own article, so it was helpful that you linked to the policy. UnderTheBusDweller (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Bro just deleted half of the wiki page... Why, because of "unreliable" sources? Why don't you go find sources than? An o niem ja ( talk) 20:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Are you sure about your conscription revert for Suga; there are over a dozen reliable sources which have reported this here: [3]. ErnestKrause ( talk) 17:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 00:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I tried looking for a good source (one that doesn't violate WP:TWITTERREF), but a google search only gives back either articles that reference this tweet by @chartdata, or the tweet itself. I saw, in your revision summary, that it also needs to link to the Spotify page, which as you said changes daily. I'm assuming you want a Wayback Machine archive of the page, but Spotify doesn't really work on Wayback Machine. I'm messaging you directly so I can get more information on how to add a reliable source that complies with Wikipedia's standards. Having the old record of Justin Bieber on the page also bugs me quite a bit, as I kinda like when Wikipedia reflects the current status of things. I've put up an {{Oudated}} template on the section of Time of Peak Monthly Listeners for now.
Sincerly,
Dontuseurrealname (
talk) 19:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Why did you undo my revision on the list of CSM characters? HiGuys69420 ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
First ,u got in the page of most-liked Instas reveting my things "juste because blablah we can't erase ??" But why would anyone put in the talk page that selena gomez got one million ,and few minutes later u got onto Lady Susan Hussey of The United Kingdom where the maiden name is only for the divorceed and reverted my things again?? This is not a coincidence U R stalking my page 41.249.136.226 ( talk) 18:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, can you check the most recent edit I made on the page? I think my wording of the record based on the Newsis article might be slightly off, but I'm not 100% sure. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, saw that you removed what I added to the article Tobias Forge. The sources are directly from the magazine (Frimuraren) of the Swedish Order of Freemasons and they have stated at least twice that Forge is a Freemason. Additionally, in 2018, former band members stated that he had connections with Freemasonry.
Sources: Frimuraren nummer 4 2019 swedish, Frimuraren nummer 4 2020 swedish, EX-GHOST MEMBERS CLAIM TOBIAS FORGE'S FREEMASONRY TIES TAINTED TRIAL OUTCOME -- Slagmannen924 ( talk) 16:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
I usually update the IMI International Top 20 Singles page and archive the chart every Monday when it updates, but the past three weeks (the last 2 and this week) the url's been redirecting to these rly weird spam/ad pages for me and when I try to archive it, it saves as a captcha page. Could you access the url and tell me if it redirects for you/try to archive it on archive.vn and see if it saves like normal? Thankfully someone else has also been saving it on Wayback so there are useable archives where I was unable to create any, but the archive.vn archives are no good for me. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 16:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
System is not a History. Dali Yang Yizhen is notable. Are you is contract or responsible? 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 00:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Are you paid writer of Yang (Surname)? 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 00:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Below are lists of common South Korean family names and Korean first names.
Korean Names - A Complete List of Meanings and Examples (90daykorean.com)
https://www.90daykorean.com/korean-names/
It is newer and a lot more differents.
Just do. 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 01:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Better than others and not the blogs. 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 01:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 113.210.105.245 ( talk) 10:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Komca updated Take Two on the db and idk whether I should replace the Melon source or not. Nois Upgrader is apparently Shin Won Park (if you click on his Melon profile), but Komca uses SWP only (and doesn't cite his NU name) while Spotify uses NU just like Melon (as do all the other music sites that list credits like Spotify, NetEase etc.). -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Smith.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Song recordings produced by Suga (rapper) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 06:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I readded BoA's image to the article because I felt like it did not have enough representation from non-American musicians as they take up probably 90% of the images. Among Korean singers, BoA is perhaps most widely associated with any honorific nickname so I figured she deserves a image on the article. Thoughts? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 12:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
hi, why you keep deleting jeon wonwoo's name from 'Jeon (Korean Surname)' article. It seems some people added his name so many times but you keep deleting it. EverythingEverywhereEveryone.W ( talk) 10:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Do you know any American editor who works on BTS related pages (or not) that could archive the Golden digital album store link on archive today? Because I'm not from the US, it saves with the disclaimer msg over it every time I access the link. On Wayback it saved just fine, but archive today is the problem. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 15:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-streamed artists on Spotify, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spotify streaming records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Someone changed the type of songs " Love Me Again" and " Rainy Days" from single to B-side. Is this edit correct? Estyxxxx ( talk) 09:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Estyxxxx: Mostly because nobody bothered to add it. I'll get to it whenever I have time (I'm technically working now lol). You can also add it yourself if you feel comfortable doing so - but if not I'll do it later. - Ïvana ( talk) 17:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi! What is wrong with Ceca being on the list? I provided the source. Vjko ( talk) 17:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hi Ivanacccp! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Bsherr ( talk) 18:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
List of most-liked tweets—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
L293D (
☎ •
✎) 21:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ivanacccp! When adding tweets to these tables could you please include the 'access-date' parameter as well i.e. the date you add a tweet to the list? That way when I'm doing cleanup on the articles, if any info is missing I can use that date to go back to the page history and find when it was added and by whom, or search Google around that time for refs to support the tweets. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 22:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I want to point it out the new Twitter feature introduced in the last 1-2 months regarding the number of retweets displayed. So basically the new counter of retweets includes both retweets and retweets with comments (the "quotes"). The label has changed from "retweets" to "retweets and comments" and if you click it, you will see two columns displaying the number of retweets with comments and the number of retweets without comments. Before this new implementation, the Twitter counter included the retweets only (without the quotes). Here the article about this https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21256586/twitter-ios-quote-tweets-retweets-with-comments#:~:text=The%20new%20feature%20organizes%20all,of%20retweets%20with%20no%20comment. Now I see that the wikipedia article about the list of the most retweeted tweets reports the new number that combines retweets and quotes but I think it would be better to go back to report the actual number of retweets that is in fact the number that counts for the "most retweeted tweets of the year" list disclosed by Twitter every year. Euphorian95 ( talk) 15:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
You got ahead of me :D MKgaspari ( talk) 06:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
I mean it’s not wrong though. On KOMCA he’s listed as composer which is the same as producer. So stop editing that he didn’t produce when he actually did and is credited for it on KOMCA( korean music copyright association) which is an official thing. Purplebag54 ( talk) 04:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Article: Most subscribed YouTube music artists.
Why did you undo me? Blackpink is one group so you use "is". Maybe check my edit desc before you rv. SmallPotato talk 13:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Re: onehallyu.com KOMCA Master list 2020. It lists V with 12 copyrights co.composed co written songs. Jungkook has 10 Magic Shop was co composed and co written by JH, JK, RM and Suga Love is not Over co composed and co written by Jin and JK. You were quick to update JK's page.
Your failure to acknowledge V's talents and achievements is bias. He has made the Hall of Fame for Starmometer as Asian Heartthrob 3 years in a row. You can check their website. He. has countless records on Twitter, Twipple, Weibo, Baidu, Instagram, YT, China's Super Topic, World's Handsome Man titles, Soundcloud, ITunes, Spotify, Sold out King of everything he wears from luxury items to lip balm. Yet you as a representative of Wikipedia choose not to acknowledge any of it. News of V beating Adele and Psy's record is everywhere. I've donated to Wikipedia on the belief that all articles were accurate unbiased and up-to-date. 122.57.70.169 ( talk) 14:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Ïvana! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
When you have the time, I think you should go ahead and expand the list to 30 entries to match the most-retweeted list. Ik these lists are your forte so I figured it was better if you located the additional 10. I'll help with the footnotes+refs as needed. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 19:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
If/when you have the time, could you help locate a k-article talking about BTS extending their most daesangs record with their 2020 MMA/mama wins? I've been searching thru all articles since 2020 mama night come forward on Naver. Ik the TFMA win was their 52nd daesang overall so I'm hoping to find one that mentions all of this, or ones that mention either point. So far it's mostly been pieces talking about how many consecutive mma/mama sweeps they've done. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of K-pop Hot 100 number ones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most-streamed artists on Spotify, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, just always remember no matter what your intentions, don't ever let anyone drag you down into an edit war because WP:3RR says 3 reverts and you're blocked. Never respond in kind. I just reported him to an admin. Also, I had left it down to just the logo for each flagship product, not each member of the series. — Smuckola (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Iavana. What's your source for the most-streamed artists on Spotify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soheilpro ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
That was a nice edit you made last week on the BTS lyrical themes section. Have you given any thought to that section as to putting it into chronological order of themes or to organize it by subjects. Currently it looks like a 'selected' themes section collected by various editors at different times. Here is one article, not concentrating themes alone, which takes a chronological approach [1]. Any thoughts about enhancing the BTS lyrical themes section? ErnestKrause ( talk) 15:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ivana, just let you know that I FOUND a reliable source to the information I added earlier which you deemed unreliable. Sometimes it's better to wait for better sources than simply revert edits. Now, it's under a Forbes source, which is reliable. Kindest regards. -- CoryGlee ( talk) 20:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey would you mind archiving these urls for me? I left them archiving since early this morning when the charts updated (Wayback said it would take over 800 mins to save), but when I came back the pages hadn't moved anywhere even after refreshing (or the save page crashed+showed the "Internal Server Error" msg). I already saved them on archive.today so it's just Wayback that is the problem and I don't want to lose the sales data.
Hi there, you reverted my edits and said, "Records in this article are viewed as a whole, they're not divided by girl groups/boy groups/male soloists/female soloists/etc otherwise we would never stop"
I have two questions:
Thank you. -ink&fables «talk» 10:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
There's discussion of your action of which you may have been involved. See Talk:Music programs of South Korea 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 02:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
You know we Russians have a saying: "do not dig a grave for another, you yourself will fall into it". So, your parents (fans of male Russian names and culture) probably knew this. But you do seem to be and therefore are doing what you shouldn't. I could play this stupid game with you further, I could undo all your korea shit edits on far-fetched pretexts as you do with mine edits. But instead, I will appeal to the administration. 109.254.254.156 ( talk) 00:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey Ïvana, just wanted to let you know to contact the oversight team when removing personal information like you did here so that they can suppress, or 'oversight', it. This makes the information inaccessible from the page history, and prevents others from seeing it. I took care of it in this case. You can email the oversight team at Special:EmailUser/Oversight or make a request on irc at #wikipedia-en-revdel connect. Happy editing. EN- Jungwon 15:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ïvana,
I write to you, because you have been editing the Slavoj Žižek Page. I'm editing the Zizek bibliography. Here I also mention the op-ed publications on Russia Today. There is a WP editor who holds the opinion, that these edits violate Wikipedia:RSP. I can't see how this is applicable. You can read my argument here. The editor doesn't respond.
If you have an interest in the subject, I would be happy, if you could contribute your opinion. If you don't have an interest, maybe you know someone else who might have?
With kind regards.
-- Quin451 ( talk) 13:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Certification updates are out already, unless you prefer to wait for the website. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 00:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I posted a talk, but you seemed active so I wanted to reach out to you.
I think we should edit the page to nor merge repackages with the original release. I can’t think of a reason we would merge them on the wikipedia page meant to reflect the charts when said charts have them listed separately and don’t merge them. It feels inconsistent and inaccurate. Jayb.rd98 ( talk) 19:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
"what is the criteria to choose achievements? weekly digital points from random years are unnecessary (why not monthly? why not all years? plus the source should refer to that specific week) and annual highest points are already published"
1. It is not from random years. Gaon Music Chart started publishing digital points in 2018 when they reformed the chart.
2. the criteria for weekly instead monthly. Music charts relevance are primarily for weekly data. Someone can read the article to know what song was the No. 1 in determined week, but it is like that number one with 25M points has the same weight as the one that reached number one with 60M points.
3. "plus the source should refer to that specific week". nope, it depends on the info. as like articles of Korean tv series, viewership is not specified. You need go to Nielseen Korea website and seach for determined date. The same here because it is how Korean industry publish their data.
4. "annual highest points are already published". ???? annual is not the same as weekly highest points.
I know I won't convince you, because you don't even tried to open a discussion on article's talk page before delete everything. But I'm here just to enlight you that I wouldn't just put a rondom shit in a Wiki page. I'm here 4 years, and I know how things work. Bominsky ( talk) 00:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
"You don't see points published in the Billboard Hot 100 chart". No comparison, since Billboard does not publish they points on charts like Gaon does, and even if Billboard starts including points on Hot 100, it would be irrelevant since they also publish numbers for Streaming and Digital Sales, something that Gaon does not do. On Gaon, the weekly points are the only way someone can know how big is a song in the chart. Plus there are songs in the top 10 year-end, that can't even had reached the top 10 of highest weekly points, because most of them chart in the middle (of the chart) for almost an entire year.
Average people will never know that, because most of them think that what is on Wikipedia is sufficient. They probably will never search for it on Gaon website, and the annual list will make them believe that all that songs hit so big, when they not.
"I don't have to open a discussion to defend keeping everything the way it has been for years". ???? that's not the policy here. You just don't delete something to maintain it the way it has been for years. There are many motives (wiki rules) the community here delete without discussion, like misinsformation, neutrality, sources not reliable, too much information as well... but not on expand an article to keep it the way it had been for years lol. Articles on Wiki are supossed to be improvement and expanded.
Anyway, I understand your point, and I won't try to change it, maybe in the future someone try introduce it again. Talk page is supposed to be used. Use it.
Bominsky ( talk) 05:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am kinda new with editing Wikipedia pages, and i had a question about the last edit you made on the article List of most-streamed artists on Spotify. You changed something from the source i found, but i don't know what and why exactly. Can you explain that to me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by An o niem ja ( talk • contribs) 20:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
You said in your rollback edit that the whole table needs to be updated in one go, and that was what i did, but you still rollbacked it (you only rounded the numbers down in your recent edit). But why — Preceding unsigned comment added by An o niem ja ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Okay i get it. Thanks! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
An o niem ja (
talk •
contribs) 14:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I did not add any information to that article. I was recent changes patrolling and undid someone elses deletion, thought it was deletion of content without explanation (blanking). If I got a recent patrol change incorrect, happy to be advised :) Thanks. Such-change47 ( talk) 12:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not understanding the edits you're making to the large group of set index articles of Korean names, like what you have done at Sung-bin. Per WP:SIA#Common selection criteria, particularly the List of notable items section, there is no requirement for the subjects to have an article. ✗ plicit 02:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Han (name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zhang Han and Han Fu.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Since I am have made no edits on the Jimin article, I am prepared to archive and close the talk page discussion there as having no consensus for adding the edit under discussion. ErnestKrause ( talk) 20:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey could you archive this week's update of the GSC? Wayback has been giving me a lot for trouble this past week and I've been unable to save the GSC url in particular, even though I've tried multiple times since Wednesday to do so. WB always either says it'll take several hours to save, or that the archive has been saved x amount of minutes ago, but when I search for it the last-saved archive is May 25 only. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 01:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
the links in the article. List of most-streamed songs on Spotify they are not complete and they are also very poorly added Tirso Gutiérrez ( talk) 14:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
It is also written in Wikipedia, and I will write the text here that does not need to be reviewed. Plz don't start an editorial dispute.
Seonghan of Silla - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Seonghan_of_Silla According to some theories, he was a son of Kim Alji, or a seventh-generation descendant of Xiongnu through the Han Dynasty general Jin Midi. 59.16.47.85 ( talk) 00:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
I’m unsure if you were a participant when this was being settled, but Hanbin of tempest belongs on that page and has been settled over a year ago. Admins has to get involved to stop people from continuing to remove him, it was determined that he was acceptable to be there and his article is currently in the process of being translated from Vietnamese.
If you could respect the decision that was made, that would be great, otherwise I will continue to have to fix it when you choose to not respect that decision Thank you very much Jayb.rd98 ( talk) Jayb.rd98 ( talk) 20:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ivana !! I have been checking out Butter's Page recently and i came across the controversy section which includes the infamous billboard article and uses it as a source. it has been almost a year since this incident happened but frankly it still irks me that this section is still included and somehow hasn't been removed despite everything.
I don't know if you were on twitter at that time or you have an idea about the matter, but the user who edited the page and added this section had a twitter page and they had numerous hate tweets against bts and armys and their account is filled with content targeted towards bts (ironically, just like the tweets included in the billboard article). so it is clear that the editing was with ill-intentions. i was looking through the bts talk page and i saw a discussion between you and him about that edit and i noticed that no one brought up the fact that he is a person who clearly hates bts and added that part of the article on purpose, so i thought that you did not know about this. i can link the tweets if you wish
And yeah, i found out that somehow his page still exists and he is still here doing edits daily.
I know it's been almost a year since this incident happened but i've been thinking alot about this lately; i am no expert, but isn't this considered a sort of vandalism taking into regard his intentions and the fact that he admitted adding the section because of his hatred? therefore shouldn't he be banned from being on here?
I think it's kinda disappointing that such people have the authority to change and have an input in public material like wiki pages when they are clearly not qualified to be one, again, i am no expert and i don't know wikipedia's policies regarding such things
This might sound like some kind of vent. but i really would like to hear your opinion on this !
Hope you have a nice day and thank you for you hard work on here <3
Sanarghzl ( talk) Sanarghzl ( talk) 15:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hy Brasil (
talk) 19:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi wouldn't it be better to update sales based on the new circle/ gaon retail album chart? The chart was updated in 2022 and now shows actual global sales and not just shipments like from the gaon/circle album chart. The Korea Herald published an article about it "Gaon Chart aims to become global kpop chart with new name" Simsky12 ( talk) 15:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey Ivana, I just wanted to ask what you would consider proper resources for both of the Kim’s who hail from the Gwangsan Kim clan. I saw in the edit history that people have linked videographic sources of them themselves saying that they are in fact descendants of the Gwangsan Kim clan, but their addition to the list of known descendants keeps getting removed by both yourself and others. What would be sufficient in order to keep their name in the list? Thank you for your time!
Also, if this comes across as rude, it is not intentional and I apologize if I come across that way. DC11961 ( talk) 02:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ivana, my username here at Wikipedia is Nadiaminki, my question is why are you removing my additions to the article when I've cited them with different sources, in English and Korean about Kim Mingyu and Kim Hongjoong and insisting on the "no notability in the article"? I don't want to be deemed rude, English isn't my first language or my mother tongue. What requirements I'm missing so both of them can stay on the Gwangsan Kim clan wiki? Thank you for your attention and time! Have a nice day. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Nadiaminki (
talk •
contribs) 20:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that BTS has had more than 5 noms at the Grammy's over the years; are you sure you want to put it that way in the lead as you did yesterday? ErnestKrause ( talk) 15:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I accidentally reverted your revert on So-won while looking at the notification, but I changed it back. I apologize if you saw that version. I looked at the page history after that, and I wasn’t aware that I wasn’t supposed to add group members who didn’t have their own article, so it was helpful that you linked to the policy. UnderTheBusDweller (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Bro just deleted half of the wiki page... Why, because of "unreliable" sources? Why don't you go find sources than? An o niem ja ( talk) 20:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Are you sure about your conscription revert for Suga; there are over a dozen reliable sources which have reported this here: [3]. ErnestKrause ( talk) 17:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 00:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I tried looking for a good source (one that doesn't violate WP:TWITTERREF), but a google search only gives back either articles that reference this tweet by @chartdata, or the tweet itself. I saw, in your revision summary, that it also needs to link to the Spotify page, which as you said changes daily. I'm assuming you want a Wayback Machine archive of the page, but Spotify doesn't really work on Wayback Machine. I'm messaging you directly so I can get more information on how to add a reliable source that complies with Wikipedia's standards. Having the old record of Justin Bieber on the page also bugs me quite a bit, as I kinda like when Wikipedia reflects the current status of things. I've put up an {{Oudated}} template on the section of Time of Peak Monthly Listeners for now.
Sincerly,
Dontuseurrealname (
talk) 19:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Why did you undo my revision on the list of CSM characters? HiGuys69420 ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
First ,u got in the page of most-liked Instas reveting my things "juste because blablah we can't erase ??" But why would anyone put in the talk page that selena gomez got one million ,and few minutes later u got onto Lady Susan Hussey of The United Kingdom where the maiden name is only for the divorceed and reverted my things again?? This is not a coincidence U R stalking my page 41.249.136.226 ( talk) 18:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, can you check the most recent edit I made on the page? I think my wording of the record based on the Newsis article might be slightly off, but I'm not 100% sure. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, saw that you removed what I added to the article Tobias Forge. The sources are directly from the magazine (Frimuraren) of the Swedish Order of Freemasons and they have stated at least twice that Forge is a Freemason. Additionally, in 2018, former band members stated that he had connections with Freemasonry.
Sources: Frimuraren nummer 4 2019 swedish, Frimuraren nummer 4 2020 swedish, EX-GHOST MEMBERS CLAIM TOBIAS FORGE'S FREEMASONRY TIES TAINTED TRIAL OUTCOME -- Slagmannen924 ( talk) 16:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
I usually update the IMI International Top 20 Singles page and archive the chart every Monday when it updates, but the past three weeks (the last 2 and this week) the url's been redirecting to these rly weird spam/ad pages for me and when I try to archive it, it saves as a captcha page. Could you access the url and tell me if it redirects for you/try to archive it on archive.vn and see if it saves like normal? Thankfully someone else has also been saving it on Wayback so there are useable archives where I was unable to create any, but the archive.vn archives are no good for me. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 16:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
System is not a History. Dali Yang Yizhen is notable. Are you is contract or responsible? 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 00:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Are you paid writer of Yang (Surname)? 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 00:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Below are lists of common South Korean family names and Korean first names.
Korean Names - A Complete List of Meanings and Examples (90daykorean.com)
https://www.90daykorean.com/korean-names/
It is newer and a lot more differents.
Just do. 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 01:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Better than others and not the blogs. 2001:448A:20E0:6E0B:DDC9:7093:788F:2563 ( talk) 01:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 113.210.105.245 ( talk) 10:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Komca updated Take Two on the db and idk whether I should replace the Melon source or not. Nois Upgrader is apparently Shin Won Park (if you click on his Melon profile), but Komca uses SWP only (and doesn't cite his NU name) while Spotify uses NU just like Melon (as do all the other music sites that list credits like Spotify, NetEase etc.). -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Smith.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Song recordings produced by Suga (rapper) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 06:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I readded BoA's image to the article because I felt like it did not have enough representation from non-American musicians as they take up probably 90% of the images. Among Korean singers, BoA is perhaps most widely associated with any honorific nickname so I figured she deserves a image on the article. Thoughts? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 12:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
hi, why you keep deleting jeon wonwoo's name from 'Jeon (Korean Surname)' article. It seems some people added his name so many times but you keep deleting it. EverythingEverywhereEveryone.W ( talk) 10:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Do you know any American editor who works on BTS related pages (or not) that could archive the Golden digital album store link on archive today? Because I'm not from the US, it saves with the disclaimer msg over it every time I access the link. On Wayback it saved just fine, but archive today is the problem. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 15:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-streamed artists on Spotify, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spotify streaming records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Someone changed the type of songs " Love Me Again" and " Rainy Days" from single to B-side. Is this edit correct? Estyxxxx ( talk) 09:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Estyxxxx: Mostly because nobody bothered to add it. I'll get to it whenever I have time (I'm technically working now lol). You can also add it yourself if you feel comfortable doing so - but if not I'll do it later. - Ïvana ( talk) 17:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi! What is wrong with Ceca being on the list? I provided the source. Vjko ( talk) 17:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)