This page is intended as
humor. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia
policy or guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. |
This page in a nutshell:
|
Sometimes debates on Wikipedia may die a natural death. This is completely ordinary nowhere near normal, however it may not always result in a good outcome, and per some instances, it may result in
the wrong version of a page being the one that gets protected. This is where you come in to save the day and revive the debate that already died. If that dead horse didn't give you what you wanted yet, go back into that carcass and get the stick again that they told you to drop!
Head to ground zero, the talk page where you lost. This is where you take revenge! You like revenge, right? Everybody likes revenge! So let's go GET SOME! [1]
Ping the entire discussion's previous participants, and consider reverting against consensus as well! You won't get anywhere without following the BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle. If you get blocked by a rogue administrator, just wait out the block and get to the talk page to argue your point. You may be compelled to submit to the inappropriately extant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (which itself should be replaced by the BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle).
As soon as everyone starts responding with their votes and they're completely reasonable and likely rightful canvassed, biased, and traitorous comments, respond to every single one. A really good idea is to cite that consensus always had existed and argue that
local consensus overrides all meaning. If you need to forge consensus, DO SO! No one will know anyway!
It's not like every action that you make is logged publicly and that you can't hide everything you've ever done on Wikimedia projects.
Personal attacks have been evidenced to help quite a bit.
You're free to drop it off at the Wikimedia Head Office in San Francisco. Don't worry about BART Police; they can't do nothing about abusing a dead horse.
You know what policy I'm talking about. You know that stage four has been attained once you get someone saying the following to you:
Mission successful. If they haven't relented yet, continue on.
It always works, boys and girls. Especially when you're debating Mr. Landlord!
If for some reason it DOESN'T work...rely on these strategies
Congratulations! They should have backed off now! [a] You have won the debate! [b] It's finally time for you to drop the stick. [c] You won, congratulations! But what if the debate was only a partial victory? What if you don't have all six human SOULs? In that case, KEEP IT UP and restart the process. Don't stop until you attain ULTIMATE VICTORY!
This page is intended as
humor. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia
policy or guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. |
This page in a nutshell:
|
Sometimes debates on Wikipedia may die a natural death. This is completely ordinary nowhere near normal, however it may not always result in a good outcome, and per some instances, it may result in
the wrong version of a page being the one that gets protected. This is where you come in to save the day and revive the debate that already died. If that dead horse didn't give you what you wanted yet, go back into that carcass and get the stick again that they told you to drop!
Head to ground zero, the talk page where you lost. This is where you take revenge! You like revenge, right? Everybody likes revenge! So let's go GET SOME! [1]
Ping the entire discussion's previous participants, and consider reverting against consensus as well! You won't get anywhere without following the BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle. If you get blocked by a rogue administrator, just wait out the block and get to the talk page to argue your point. You may be compelled to submit to the inappropriately extant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (which itself should be replaced by the BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle).
As soon as everyone starts responding with their votes and they're completely reasonable and likely rightful canvassed, biased, and traitorous comments, respond to every single one. A really good idea is to cite that consensus always had existed and argue that
local consensus overrides all meaning. If you need to forge consensus, DO SO! No one will know anyway!
It's not like every action that you make is logged publicly and that you can't hide everything you've ever done on Wikimedia projects.
Personal attacks have been evidenced to help quite a bit.
You're free to drop it off at the Wikimedia Head Office in San Francisco. Don't worry about BART Police; they can't do nothing about abusing a dead horse.
You know what policy I'm talking about. You know that stage four has been attained once you get someone saying the following to you:
Mission successful. If they haven't relented yet, continue on.
It always works, boys and girls. Especially when you're debating Mr. Landlord!
If for some reason it DOESN'T work...rely on these strategies
Congratulations! They should have backed off now! [a] You have won the debate! [b] It's finally time for you to drop the stick. [c] You won, congratulations! But what if the debate was only a partial victory? What if you don't have all six human SOULs? In that case, KEEP IT UP and restart the process. Don't stop until you attain ULTIMATE VICTORY!