Reason: Most of the coverage the subject received is recent because of the rank scored in UPSC exam, it classifies as news (for a single event) and
WP:NOTNEWS. The other achievement is finalist of
Femina Miss India 2016, which certainly does not makes the subject notable.
Reason: The term Marksheet Verification, means nothing more than the literal meaning verification of the marksheet (result/scorecard) by some authorised organisation. I do not see any need for an individual article for the topic.
Reason: The target page(
Muhibullah Allahabadi) had no reference about the alternate name(that is the redirect -
QutubeAllahabad), until it was added by the page creator of QutubeAllahabad
here, without any suitable reference.
The page creator lists
here a
website, but its a
user-generated website which does not seems to be reliable and independent to be accepted as a ref.
I tried searching for a ref, but all I was able to find was content on ugc websites.
Reason: Fails
WP:TVSERIES and
WP:GNG, no significant (better to say none) coverage in reliable and independent sources.
P.S. - Times of India (used as a ref in the article) has a
history of including promotional articles and the general consensus is not to accept it as a reliable source in such context.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Coverage found only for when the subject was awarded
Padma Shri (fourth highest civilian honor in India), which classifies as
WP:1E.
Reason: All of the refs listed in the article are interview articles of the subject, making them clearly inadmissible as an independent ref. Fails
WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Page creator is welcome to list
best three sources in the discussion, if wants to rebut the claim.
Reason: Relisting again after
removing the unreferenced term from the target page. (as
suggested by Rosguill) The reason for deletion stands same as the previous nomination.
The target page(
Muhibullah Allahabadi) had no reference about the alternate name(that is the redirect -
QutubeAllahabad), until it was added by the page creator of QutubeAllahabad
here, without any suitable reference. I have removed the dubious mention from the target page and left a
message on the talk page.
The page creator lists
here a
website, but its a
user-generated website which does not seems to be reliable and independent to be accepted as a ref.
Reason: The page creator have added 30 refs. But if we look clearly - it is visible that all of the refs are news snippets from 20 August - 22 August about the software winning a competition round organised by Government of India. The application is even
not yet released to common public.
Wikipedia is not a news website and
WP:1E.
Reason: All the references are news articles about the same fact/event that - "He is the first Sikh official in the Governor's House, Lahore.".In news for
one event only and fails
WP:GNG.
Reason: Doesn't meet the
WP:SOLDIER, as the MVC is a second tier award and is awarded only once to the subject. Also fails
WP:GNG.Recreated after PROD.
Reason: Content is not written as an encyclopedia article. Appears to be solely for the purpose of promoting the belief system; would need a complete rewrite. Completely unreferenced, the only link is to the website of the organization.
Reason: As per the
district census book of
Nellore (on Page No. 193), the name of the village is Thamidapadu, there is no sign of Madhavanagar in the book. As the the first line of the article reads , it is a sub-village. Fails
WP:GEOLAND and
WP:GNG. Nominated after PROD was removed.
Reason: Most of the coverage the subject received is recent because of the rank scored in UPSC exam, it classifies as news (for a single event) and
WP:NOTNEWS. The other achievement is finalist of
Femina Miss India 2016, which certainly does not makes the subject notable.
Reason: The term Marksheet Verification, means nothing more than the literal meaning verification of the marksheet (result/scorecard) by some authorised organisation. I do not see any need for an individual article for the topic.
Reason: The target page(
Muhibullah Allahabadi) had no reference about the alternate name(that is the redirect -
QutubeAllahabad), until it was added by the page creator of QutubeAllahabad
here, without any suitable reference.
The page creator lists
here a
website, but its a
user-generated website which does not seems to be reliable and independent to be accepted as a ref.
I tried searching for a ref, but all I was able to find was content on ugc websites.
Reason: Fails
WP:TVSERIES and
WP:GNG, no significant (better to say none) coverage in reliable and independent sources.
P.S. - Times of India (used as a ref in the article) has a
history of including promotional articles and the general consensus is not to accept it as a reliable source in such context.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Coverage found only for when the subject was awarded
Padma Shri (fourth highest civilian honor in India), which classifies as
WP:1E.
Reason: All of the refs listed in the article are interview articles of the subject, making them clearly inadmissible as an independent ref. Fails
WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Page creator is welcome to list
best three sources in the discussion, if wants to rebut the claim.
Reason: Relisting again after
removing the unreferenced term from the target page. (as
suggested by Rosguill) The reason for deletion stands same as the previous nomination.
The target page(
Muhibullah Allahabadi) had no reference about the alternate name(that is the redirect -
QutubeAllahabad), until it was added by the page creator of QutubeAllahabad
here, without any suitable reference. I have removed the dubious mention from the target page and left a
message on the talk page.
The page creator lists
here a
website, but its a
user-generated website which does not seems to be reliable and independent to be accepted as a ref.
Reason: The page creator have added 30 refs. But if we look clearly - it is visible that all of the refs are news snippets from 20 August - 22 August about the software winning a competition round organised by Government of India. The application is even
not yet released to common public.
Wikipedia is not a news website and
WP:1E.
Reason: All the references are news articles about the same fact/event that - "He is the first Sikh official in the Governor's House, Lahore.".In news for
one event only and fails
WP:GNG.
Reason: Doesn't meet the
WP:SOLDIER, as the MVC is a second tier award and is awarded only once to the subject. Also fails
WP:GNG.Recreated after PROD.
Reason: Content is not written as an encyclopedia article. Appears to be solely for the purpose of promoting the belief system; would need a complete rewrite. Completely unreferenced, the only link is to the website of the organization.
Reason: As per the
district census book of
Nellore (on Page No. 193), the name of the village is Thamidapadu, there is no sign of Madhavanagar in the book. As the the first line of the article reads , it is a sub-village. Fails
WP:GEOLAND and
WP:GNG. Nominated after PROD was removed.