Reason: I don't see how this passes
our notability guidelines.All reviews are in local magazines or consists of trivial mentions.Most sources are acutely
non-reliable.One's poetry being selected under the purview of some examination syllabus hardly confers notability.Encycloepdia Singhiana is another Sindhi-figures-promotional spam-site
Reason: I fail to see an iota of notability of the subject and non-trivial significant coverage about it, except in the biographical hagiography of
Meher Baba and self-sources.
Notability isn't inherited.
Part of a walled garden around
Meher Baba.Nukable mess.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be noted that the two sources found upon a GBook search, which covers the topic, (one of which is included here as a reference), has been plagiarized in toto from Raj-era sources.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article (Ref 1 fails on this ground).It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.Hits in census-directories and other trivial name-mentions are located but that does not quite make it:)
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm unsure as to notability.It existed but likely nothing more.Newspapers.com throws up mere advertisements, nothing on JSTor or PUBMED or Highbeam et al....
Reason: Fails to receive intellectually independent coverage across the two sources (BBC and NDTV-piece) that were available in my search and seemed semi-descent. The latter is solely written in terms of awarding her a non-notable award.
The Better India source over this article ain't a RS. IIMLN awards are miles away from being notable. The Hindu leadership award is equally non-notable stuff. Ref-4 is the NDTV piece that I described above. Homepage ofher own trust isn't a RS. The Times Foundation is an associate of Ruia and that explains the puff piece that they have penned; well ain't RS.
Reason: Fails
WP:NOTNEWS. The sole remarkable stuff that happened with the group was that its chair got arrested whilst partaking in Sabarimala Protests.
Reason: I don't see how this passes
our notability guidelines.All reviews are in local magazines or consists of trivial mentions.Most sources are acutely
non-reliable.One's poetry being selected under the purview of some examination syllabus hardly confers notability.Encycloepdia Singhiana is another Sindhi-figures-promotional spam-site
Reason: I fail to see an iota of notability of the subject and non-trivial significant coverage about it, except in the biographical hagiography of
Meher Baba and self-sources.
Notability isn't inherited.
Part of a walled garden around
Meher Baba.Nukable mess.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be noted that the two sources found upon a GBook search, which covers the topic, (one of which is included here as a reference), has been plagiarized in toto from Raj-era sources.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article (Ref 1 fails on this ground).It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.Hits in census-directories and other trivial name-mentions are located but that does not quite make it:)
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any
reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been
determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
Reason: I'm unsure as to notability.It existed but likely nothing more.Newspapers.com throws up mere advertisements, nothing on JSTor or PUBMED or Highbeam et al....
Reason: Fails to receive intellectually independent coverage across the two sources (BBC and NDTV-piece) that were available in my search and seemed semi-descent. The latter is solely written in terms of awarding her a non-notable award.
The Better India source over this article ain't a RS. IIMLN awards are miles away from being notable. The Hindu leadership award is equally non-notable stuff. Ref-4 is the NDTV piece that I described above. Homepage ofher own trust isn't a RS. The Times Foundation is an associate of Ruia and that explains the puff piece that they have penned; well ain't RS.
Reason: Fails
WP:NOTNEWS. The sole remarkable stuff that happened with the group was that its chair got arrested whilst partaking in Sabarimala Protests.