Reason: So, first of all, this would have passed as a G11 but I’ve decided to hold my horse. The are claims of the entity producing a ₦5 million budget movie titled Ija Ekun. The three sources produced, two are notable but does not mention Ija Ekun or the entity itself. In a nutshell, this entity does not pass the
WP:GNG criteria.
Reason: The entity fails the
general notability guideline. The sources used for the entity are directorys such as
MusicBrainz and
FilmFreeway. Nigerian Tribune would help to establish notability BUT just it can't. The Billboard article says nothing about Snazzy the Optimist, as it wasn't even talking about it in the first place. Lambo Xtra and the Pulse Nigeria article are both paid posts. Others are content farms.
Reason: Solely notable for appearing in Forbes Africa (not the real Forbes or a subsidiary) 30 Under 30. No significant coverage save for interviews.
Reading Beans (
talk) 09:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Reason: No
significant coverage in multiple
reliable sources. There are only four reliable sources I was able to find on the web (and they’ve been cite). Best,
Reason: I have gone through the sources only to find that they are interviews (probably self written interviews). A WP:BEFORE does not bring forth anything credible to support that this entity meets the general notability guidelines. PS: There is a Hon. Linus Okorie from Ebonyi state that is not this entity. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 11:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Poorly sourced advertisement. A WP:BEFORE shows that it fails GNG. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 02:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The subject is notable and a public figure. Rather than marking it for deletion, I appeal that you improve the article. This is what Wikipedia is about. It takes more than one Wikipedia editors to create article.
I don't create page or articles on an object or subject that's not notable, and I always encourage editors who are our members in Abuja Wikipedia Network to always consider improving existing articles especially when such article is about a notable person.
Wikinaija (
talk) 14:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The only
reliable albeit not independent source that has a
significant coverage about him is the only source already available in the article. Best,
Reason: Some sources are press releases, some are written by contributors (see the Forbes source). These sources does not confer notability. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 20:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: There are multiple sources that does not pass the
general notability guidelines. All the sources are either interviews or puff pieces about what he said, nothing in-depth or independent. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Promo stuff. Sources are mostly from unreliable sources or press releases. Others from supposed reliable sources are interviews or promotional puffs about what he said. Best,
Reason: This BLP lacks in-depth and significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. The four sources: two is about an endorsement deal, the other is an interview. Best,
Reason: This BLP has coverage for being the national youth leaders of a political party and another for being among a list of 100 influential person's by MIPD (a non-notable award). Aside these, no in-depth independent reliable source can be found, thus, fails
WP:GNG. Best,
Reason: While trying to promote this individual, the talent manager OVO just makes it all about himself. The sources available are not independent and thus this individual does not meet the
general notability guidelines. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I cannot see the copy of the previous version of this article but I don't think that nothing much has changed since
April, 2023. It is flooded with unreliable, music download websites thus fails the
general notability guidelines. Also, be weary when reviewing the sources. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This article was first moved by
Onel5969 last year. 11 days ago,
Ritchie333 draftified it. I had already draftified it but moved it back to mainspace (because the creator will likely publish it back and I didn't know it had been previously draftified) for broader consensus. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Available sources are promotional puff pieces in reliable sources. The entry itself, is written as an advertisement. Also, Ajifohils and Hilspress seems to be the same person. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources present and available does not have an in-depth discussion about this entity. Ref bombed to promote. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Worked a special assistant to the governor and later an APPOINTED local government TRANSITION chairman. Does not meet NPOL. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: All positions that looks political are for the Rotary Club. Available coverages are press releases. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I am not convinced that this subject has been discussed in independent, reliable sources and thus does not meet the general notability guidelines. Nominating for the input of the community. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 13:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sources available about subject are press releases or articles talking about his organisation Nairametrics. No in-depth discussion about him in independent, reliable sources. Redirect made was undone by the creator which means that the decision was not welcomed. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 18:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources that are available are PR sources in Nigerian newspapers. I am suspecting that the creator (a Nigerian) is paid to make these edits and the articles in the Nigerian papers are there to aid him in his undisclosed paid editing. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 19:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Reference bombed with unreliable sources (except for tooXclusive which has no in-depth coverage). Subject fails the
general notability guidelines and any other SNG.Also, note that, the image in the entry was uploaded on Commons just a day after the creation of this article. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Largely sourced to
WP:IMDB which is unreliable. Can't find enough coverage (probably because of language barrier). Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Created since 2021, the sources available are paid for (Partner at TechCabal is a tag for paid sources) and it is laced with a lot of unreliable sources. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: If someone requests for the source analysis I would do it. RATIONALE: The article is filled with interviews from different reliable sources making them non-independent and thus failing the general notability guidelines. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Subject does not meet the general notability guidelines for living persons. First sources is an interview, second is a paid press release (Partner at TechCabal is for paid articles), the others from Business Day relies solely on what he said AND they were written by the same author, so, I don’t know make out whatever you can. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 08:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Topic does not meet the
general notability guidelines. The sources available (which you can go through) are PR and press releases. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 03:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Non-notable Nigerian technology executive. Most sources are just passing mention.
this link from Nigerian Tribune seems to be a press release. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Topic does not meet the criteria for the
notability nor the SNG for
academics. H-index on G Scholar is 7 and 6 since 2018. Creator disputed DRAFTIFY process. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Previously draftified and moved to mainspace recently. Available sources both online and on the entry are majorly press releases for his appointment in 2018. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources available (as seen online) does not scratch
the general notability guidelines. As seen in the sources available on the entry, it is filled with "he said..." which makes them non-independent. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Alright. Aside from the advertising problem which could be fixed by copy-editing, this entry is not notable. I have concerns of sockpuppetry and undisclosed paid advertising. Some citations failed verification (didn't even mention the fella) and thus does not meet the
general notability criteria. The SNG for politicians does not apply here, he was only a member of the board of NDDC. So... Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Perhaps due to language, but, I can't find anything on the web that constitutes NOTABILITY. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I’m not sure the entry meets any criteria on
WP:NPROF because available sources (include a
WP:BEFORE) does not bring forth articles that satisfies notability. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: All sources available are not independent neither do they have
significant coverage about the entry. And so, the subject does not meet the
general notability guidelines. My instincts tell me that is a case of undisclosed paid editing; so I won’t be surprised there’s an influx of "new" editors voting and not !voting keeps! Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 11:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The available sources are press releases of their establishment. Moreso, sources are talking about Ogelle, so, I am surprised why they're being used in an entry called Prantle formally known as Jawonsi. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 17:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Nothing much has changed since
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapyd. Almost same sources and they're press releases about acquisitions and fundraises. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 08:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A BEFORE gives me interviews from reliable sources thus failing the independent and in-depth coverage criteria needed to establish notability. Others are press releases. Nothing secondary or independent found. PS: Article was previously draftified by Jamiebuba.
Reason: An honest time consuming BEFORE did not provide sources that didn't rely on "according to..." "In a Facebook post..." et cetera. The sources available as also seen in the article are not
independent of the subject and lacks
significant coverage. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Aside from UPE concerns, the articles seems to be filled with articles that are paid for. Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the
Governor of Lagos State; which does not pass the bar for
WP:NPOL. As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL. Neither does Olayinka meet the
general notability guidelines independently. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: So, first of all, this would have passed as a G11 but I’ve decided to hold my horse. The are claims of the entity producing a ₦5 million budget movie titled Ija Ekun. The three sources produced, two are notable but does not mention Ija Ekun or the entity itself. In a nutshell, this entity does not pass the
WP:GNG criteria.
Reason: The entity fails the
general notability guideline. The sources used for the entity are directorys such as
MusicBrainz and
FilmFreeway. Nigerian Tribune would help to establish notability BUT just it can't. The Billboard article says nothing about Snazzy the Optimist, as it wasn't even talking about it in the first place. Lambo Xtra and the Pulse Nigeria article are both paid posts. Others are content farms.
Reason: Solely notable for appearing in Forbes Africa (not the real Forbes or a subsidiary) 30 Under 30. No significant coverage save for interviews.
Reading Beans (
talk) 09:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Reason: No
significant coverage in multiple
reliable sources. There are only four reliable sources I was able to find on the web (and they’ve been cite). Best,
Reason: I have gone through the sources only to find that they are interviews (probably self written interviews). A WP:BEFORE does not bring forth anything credible to support that this entity meets the general notability guidelines. PS: There is a Hon. Linus Okorie from Ebonyi state that is not this entity. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 11:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Poorly sourced advertisement. A WP:BEFORE shows that it fails GNG. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 02:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The subject is notable and a public figure. Rather than marking it for deletion, I appeal that you improve the article. This is what Wikipedia is about. It takes more than one Wikipedia editors to create article.
I don't create page or articles on an object or subject that's not notable, and I always encourage editors who are our members in Abuja Wikipedia Network to always consider improving existing articles especially when such article is about a notable person.
Wikinaija (
talk) 14:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The only
reliable albeit not independent source that has a
significant coverage about him is the only source already available in the article. Best,
Reason: Some sources are press releases, some are written by contributors (see the Forbes source). These sources does not confer notability. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 20:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: There are multiple sources that does not pass the
general notability guidelines. All the sources are either interviews or puff pieces about what he said, nothing in-depth or independent. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Promo stuff. Sources are mostly from unreliable sources or press releases. Others from supposed reliable sources are interviews or promotional puffs about what he said. Best,
Reason: This BLP lacks in-depth and significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. The four sources: two is about an endorsement deal, the other is an interview. Best,
Reason: This BLP has coverage for being the national youth leaders of a political party and another for being among a list of 100 influential person's by MIPD (a non-notable award). Aside these, no in-depth independent reliable source can be found, thus, fails
WP:GNG. Best,
Reason: While trying to promote this individual, the talent manager OVO just makes it all about himself. The sources available are not independent and thus this individual does not meet the
general notability guidelines. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I cannot see the copy of the previous version of this article but I don't think that nothing much has changed since
April, 2023. It is flooded with unreliable, music download websites thus fails the
general notability guidelines. Also, be weary when reviewing the sources. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This article was first moved by
Onel5969 last year. 11 days ago,
Ritchie333 draftified it. I had already draftified it but moved it back to mainspace (because the creator will likely publish it back and I didn't know it had been previously draftified) for broader consensus. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Available sources are promotional puff pieces in reliable sources. The entry itself, is written as an advertisement. Also, Ajifohils and Hilspress seems to be the same person. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources present and available does not have an in-depth discussion about this entity. Ref bombed to promote. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Worked a special assistant to the governor and later an APPOINTED local government TRANSITION chairman. Does not meet NPOL. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: All positions that looks political are for the Rotary Club. Available coverages are press releases. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I am not convinced that this subject has been discussed in independent, reliable sources and thus does not meet the general notability guidelines. Nominating for the input of the community. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 13:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sources available about subject are press releases or articles talking about his organisation Nairametrics. No in-depth discussion about him in independent, reliable sources. Redirect made was undone by the creator which means that the decision was not welcomed. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 18:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources that are available are PR sources in Nigerian newspapers. I am suspecting that the creator (a Nigerian) is paid to make these edits and the articles in the Nigerian papers are there to aid him in his undisclosed paid editing. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 19:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Reference bombed with unreliable sources (except for tooXclusive which has no in-depth coverage). Subject fails the
general notability guidelines and any other SNG.Also, note that, the image in the entry was uploaded on Commons just a day after the creation of this article. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Largely sourced to
WP:IMDB which is unreliable. Can't find enough coverage (probably because of language barrier). Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Created since 2021, the sources available are paid for (Partner at TechCabal is a tag for paid sources) and it is laced with a lot of unreliable sources. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: If someone requests for the source analysis I would do it. RATIONALE: The article is filled with interviews from different reliable sources making them non-independent and thus failing the general notability guidelines. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Subject does not meet the general notability guidelines for living persons. First sources is an interview, second is a paid press release (Partner at TechCabal is for paid articles), the others from Business Day relies solely on what he said AND they were written by the same author, so, I don’t know make out whatever you can. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 08:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Topic does not meet the
general notability guidelines. The sources available (which you can go through) are PR and press releases. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 03:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Non-notable Nigerian technology executive. Most sources are just passing mention.
this link from Nigerian Tribune seems to be a press release. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Topic does not meet the criteria for the
notability nor the SNG for
academics. H-index on G Scholar is 7 and 6 since 2018. Creator disputed DRAFTIFY process. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 12:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Previously draftified and moved to mainspace recently. Available sources both online and on the entry are majorly press releases for his appointment in 2018. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 06:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The sources available (as seen online) does not scratch
the general notability guidelines. As seen in the sources available on the entry, it is filled with "he said..." which makes them non-independent. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Alright. Aside from the advertising problem which could be fixed by copy-editing, this entry is not notable. I have concerns of sockpuppetry and undisclosed paid advertising. Some citations failed verification (didn't even mention the fella) and thus does not meet the
general notability criteria. The SNG for politicians does not apply here, he was only a member of the board of NDDC. So... Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Perhaps due to language, but, I can't find anything on the web that constitutes NOTABILITY. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 07:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I’m not sure the entry meets any criteria on
WP:NPROF because available sources (include a
WP:BEFORE) does not bring forth articles that satisfies notability. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 10:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: All sources available are not independent neither do they have
significant coverage about the entry. And so, the subject does not meet the
general notability guidelines. My instincts tell me that is a case of undisclosed paid editing; so I won’t be surprised there’s an influx of "new" editors voting and not !voting keeps! Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 11:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The available sources are press releases of their establishment. Moreso, sources are talking about Ogelle, so, I am surprised why they're being used in an entry called Prantle formally known as Jawonsi. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 17:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Nothing much has changed since
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapyd. Almost same sources and they're press releases about acquisitions and fundraises. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 08:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A BEFORE gives me interviews from reliable sources thus failing the independent and in-depth coverage criteria needed to establish notability. Others are press releases. Nothing secondary or independent found. PS: Article was previously draftified by Jamiebuba.
Reason: An honest time consuming BEFORE did not provide sources that didn't rely on "according to..." "In a Facebook post..." et cetera. The sources available as also seen in the article are not
independent of the subject and lacks
significant coverage. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Aside from UPE concerns, the articles seems to be filled with articles that are paid for. Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the
Governor of Lagos State; which does not pass the bar for
WP:NPOL. As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL. Neither does Olayinka meet the
general notability guidelines independently. Best,
Reading Beans (
talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)