This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
If you have a coffee-stained mug similar to this example here, you may be spending a little bit too much time on Wikipedia. Why not spend some more and take this test?Car of Polish Wikipediholic; If you have a car with "??.wikipedia.org," you will spend too much time on WP.If you have a keyboard similar to this example here, you might be spending too much time pressing "Wikipedia."
This is a modified version of the
Wikipediholism test. It combines questions from the main and legacy tests in order to provide a more complete diagnosis of whether you're a Wikipediholic. There are 692 questions as of rev. 821953992. As long as we're going with
Magic: the Gathering format names, I might as well call it the Extended version.
If you're not sure whether you are a
Wikipediholic or are unsure about the amount of
Wikipedihol you took, then you should take this test. Give yourself at least 15 minutes because there are around 700 questions. The point value of answering "yes" to each question is listed in parentheses ( ) at the end of the question. The higher the result, the more Wikipedihol you had!
If you have extra time, try the bonus sections to measure your Eliteness and RC. If you see URC anywhere, it is a lie and should be reported to the Universe Police.
Suggestions for new questions and modifications are of course welcome—good questions are those that measure current
addiction (e.g., "have you edited a page in the last week?", not "have you ever edited a page?"), on the hypothesis that Wikipediholicism can be cured, or at least controlled to some degree. New questions should be added as #ENTRY (point value, additional notes).
Standard,
legacy, and
modern versions are also available.
The test
Starter
Please be honest! We don't like liars!
Will you do this test? (1, we know you will)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia? (1)
How often you use Wikipedia
Do you typically use Wikipedia at least once a week? (1)
...at least once a day? (2)
Do you typically use Wikipedia for more than an hour a day? (4)
Is more than 60% of your time online spent at Wikipedia? (10)
...80%? (50)
...exactly 100%? (100)
Have you made more than 100 edits in a month? (12)
...1,000? (24)
...5,000? (48)
...10,000? (96)
...More than 20,000? (96)
Have you made more than 500 total edits? (1)
...1,000? (2)
...5,000? (4)
...10,000? (8)
...50,000? (16)
Have you reached your 50% of your previous number of edits per month? (-5, but it's probably for the best)
100%? (1)
200%? (5)
Do you have Wikipedia bookmarked? (4)
Is Wikipedia set as your home page? (15)
Is Wikipedia in your browser's search bar? (9)
Did a Wikipedia page end up in your "most visited pages" list? (2)
In the top rank? (10)
Was it this test? (10)
Have you had Wikipedia open in more than one window/tab at a time? (2)
More than five? (5, OH!)
More than ten? (12, DANG!!)
Have you used Wikipedia on more than one
browser at a time? (16)
Is one of those browsers
Internet Explorer? (-1 eliteness, switch to FirefoxChromeOperaanything (just not IE!) immediately)
Do you think you're using a significant portion of Wikipedia's
bandwidth? (5)
From how many locations or devices did you visit Wikipedia the past 30 days? (1 per machine)
Where you use Wikipedia
Do you read Wikipedia over a public wireless Internet connection? (2)
Do you edit Wikipedia articles while over such a connection? (4)
Is that connection in a restaurant? (6)
...Do you edit Wikipedia while waiting for your meal? (8)
...During your meal? (20)
...While eating? (25)
...One hand on the keyboard, and one on your food? (100—that's it, we're driving you down to the next Wikiclinic for treatment.)
Do you stop eating to edit Wikipedia and then throw your meal away, because it spoiled while you were editing? (50—you're a junkie)
Did you pick that restaurant because of the free WiFi? (5)
Do you use Wikipedia when you are waiting for a flight? (10)
Are you on an aircraft with wireless access to the Internet during flight? (5)
...because you can edit on Wikipedia on it? (25)
Are you eating your meal on said flight while taking this test or writing an article? (50)
Did you choose this flight over another because of the access to Wikipedia? (100 plus a point for every $10 more you paid for this flight than the one you would have taken)
Have you ever edited an article on Wikipedia while paying long distance charges to connect to the Internet? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia while taking a bath because you found it made the experience even more relaxing? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia in different countries? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia from Soviet Russia? (10)
While in Soviet Russia, Did Wikipedia Edit YOU!!? (50)
Did you travel to Soviet Russia just to edit Wikipedia from there? (-5, Sorry no reimbursements on flights)
Devices used to edit Wikipedia
Do you edit Wikipedia on a laptop? (1)
Did your laptop's fan go on by itself while you were on Wikipedia? (2)
Did your laptop melt (or show serious signs of melting) while you were editing Wikipedia? (100 points and a new computer fan)
Do you edit Wikipedia with a mobile phone or tablet? (2)
...Because you can't wait until you get access to a PC to add some obscure fact to Wikipedia? (4)
If you have any devices that run on
iOS, do you own the Official Wikipedia app? (2)
Did you just buy an
iPod Touch/
iPad/
iPhone just to get the wiki app? (16, impressive)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia on a video game system? (10 for each one)
Have you bought a second monitor so you could edit Wikipedia more efficiently? (25)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia so much that you broke your computer and had to buy a new one? (1000, very addicted)
When you use Wikipedia
Are you not getting enough sleep because of time on Wikipedia? (9)
Are you sleeping during the day (as of 8 AM) because you edited Wikipedia overnight? (5 points, plus overslept time in hours)
Do you forget to think twice before you say something to real people but re-check a hundred times what you have typed in before posting your comment in a talk page? (5)
After reading the last question, did you give yourself 13 points because it is always 4, 6, or 8 a.m. somewhere? (13 for cleverness :))
Do you edit Wikipedia at night (i.e. after midnight) consuming drinks to keep you up? (2)
Do you hold Wikipedia Nights, that is, nights when you intentionally go to bed late, after spending n hours editing Wikipedia? (5)
Do you get people to join you in such an event? (10)
Do you edit articles in your sleep? (17)
When you wake up in the night and can't get back to sleep due to some nagging worry do you get up and start working on Wikipedia so that you will get tired and have something relaxing to fill your mind when you go back to bed? (2)
...Did it work? (40)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia during a thunderstorm? (50 and 1 eliteness, very risky though)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia when you were in a
hurricane? (100, super risky, and the window of your house could have broken)
... editing the article about the hurricane? (10 for your contribution to
current events)
... creating the article about the hurricane? (20, even better)
Has your Wikipedia contribution style/philosophy (ex. WikiGnome, deletionism, anti-deletionism,...) shaped your real life personality and philosophy? (15)
Do you judge people you know in "real life" partly on the basis of their Wikipedia contributions? (6)
Do you think quality of contributions to Wikipedia is an important criterion in choosing a partner for a close relationship? (17 and a crash course in dating)
Have you ever met another Wikipedian in "real life"? (2)
Have you ever browsed Wikipedia while communicating with your significant other? (5)
Have you told your significant other something on Wikipedia while communicating with them? (10)
...Was he or she impressed? (5)
...Or bored? (-5)
...Or did he or she tell you to shut up? (-20)
Have you ever argued with anyone over Wikipedia's accuracy? (5)
...Did you win? (10)
...Did you win, but you were the one saying it was not accurate? (-15)
Do you find yourself caught up in Wikipedia discussions a lot? (14)
...more than real-life discussions? (36)
Has anyone ever called you a "Walking Wikipedia"? (20)
Did you get the knowledge that resulted in this title from "reliable" non-Wikimedia sources? (-20, have more faith)
Do you regularly use Wikipedia as a metaphor for life ("Hmm, I shouldn't have gone to a level three warning there")? (50)
Have you ever recommended Wikipedia to any of your real family or friends? (4)
Did they join Wikipedia and contribute? (8, for each person)
Education
Have you ever missed a deadline for a school/work assignment because you were too busy editing Wikipedia? (15)
Have you learned a new language or improved in one you already knew for the primary purpose of being able to read the Wikipedia in that language? (6)
...Or for some other reason, such as picking it up where you left it x-many years ago? (2)
Have you ever used Wikipedia to further school or work related projects? (10, good for you)
Do you sneak mobile devices into class because you want to read or edit Wikipedia? (40)
...Did the teacher catch you using your mobile device and punish you? (20)
...Or did the teacher commend you for reading/editing Wikipedia? (100)
...Because the teacher is a Wikipedian? (55)
Have you spent time editing Wikipedia instead of working on an essay or important written assignment? (3, plus half the percentage of points you missed on that assignment)
... In class? (5)
Have you ever failed a class because of Wikipedia? (We will pass you! 100)
When writing something for school or work, do you often start trying to add internal links (or other Wiki formatting code) to it? (50)
Are you late to school because you are too busy editing Wikipedia? (25, but show some discipline!)
Wikibreaks
Have you taken a
WikiBreak and you were "successful"? (-20)
... or did you come back immediately during your Wikibreak? (20)
... but pretended it still counted because you only checked your watchlist and did not edit? (5)
Have you ever publicly declared that you've quit Wikipedia but found yourself lingering about anyway? (7)
Have you ever used the
Javascript Wikibreak Enforcer, because you knew you wouldn't be able to stay away otherwise? (30)
Did you panic as soon as you hit the save key after setting it? (20)
Have you ever attempted to leave Wikipedia for good? (-100, mean)
... then have someone correct a slip you made in the article? (5)
Did you call the book Main Page? (-1 eliteness, for making disambiguation a mess)
Did you get very upset that Wikipedia was going to be closed down on January 18 2012? (50)
As the closure only applied to the English language Wikipedia, did you make sure that you knew of Wikipedias in other languages to get you through January 18 2012, mentioned on
List of Wikipedias? (50)
Did you go through the tedious process of typing ?banner=none after every url you visited? (100, you're really dedicated to the cause)
Are you depressed that there aren't enough questions in the test? (30, seriously?)
Were you distracted by other Wikipedia pages for at least 15 minutes while you were taking this test? (10)
... 30 minutes? (30)
... an hour? (50)
Are you going to edit this test once you're finished? (10)
... to correct an error you saw? (5)
... or to add a new question or two? (15)
... or to get a better score? (-100, cheater)
Did you follow a link on this test... (2)
Did you edit the page the link went to? (5)
...enough to become a featured article? (100)
Are you using this test as a To Do list? (5)
... Because you want to improve your score? (-15, cheater)
... Because you want to learn more about Wikipedia? (15)
... Because you feel it fills vital gaps in your wiki knowledge? (30)
Have you taken this test more than once? (5)
... did your score increase from last time? (10)
Do you think this test is a waste of time? (-1000, definitely not a Wikipediholic)
Did you create this test? (2000)
Did you skip any questions? (-100)
Have you spotted a typo above and now have a crushing urge to edit that typo but dare not edit it for you won't remember where you read up to? (3)
Did you immediately think of ways to improve this test, or adjust the scores so that they neatly add up to 100? (3.14)
Do you think your score is too high and maybe you'll do something about it after "a few more edits"? (6)
Do you have
NPOV issues with the negative score attributed to the previous questions? (5)
Did you create an
automated version of this test so you wouldn't have to add up your score? (100)
Have you ever taken this test more than once simply to correspond with the most recent version? (12)
Did you think of adding the {{clarification needed}} to any of the questions to know how they are worth the points given to them? (4)
Are you distraught because you cannot edit Wikipedia while you take this test? (100)
Do you take this test seriously? (10)
Did you have fun taking the test? (20, we're glad you did)
Did you laugh while taking the test? (5, for your sense of humor)
Do you want 10 points? (10)
... do you argue that this question isn't fair, because non-Wikipediholics might also want 10 points? (10)
... or do you argue that since high scores are an indicator of Wikipediholism, anyone who wanted more points on this test must be a Wikipediholic? (10)
Eliteness Section
Did somebody tell you you were elite? (1 eliteness)
Do you think points are a better system than Eliteness? (50 points, but -1 Eliteness)
Or do you think Eliteness is a better system than points? (2 Eliteness, but -25 points)
Or do you think they both are great? (25 points and 1 Eliteness, you deserve it)
Or you consider Eliteness as bonus points to questions? (10 points and 2 eliteness)
Are you complaining about point inflation? (-1000000000, but 1 Eliteness)
Are you complaining about point deflation? (1, and 1 eliteness)
Are you still complaining about
Deflategate? (-213 points, and -12 eliteness)
Do you own at least 1
indie game? (10 points, try harder)
... 3? (1 Eliteness, great)
... 7? (3 Eliteness, I support your decision to support independent creators)
... 15? (5 Eliteness, you must have money or
Steam)
... 25?! (10 Eliteness, WOW)
Do you like the expansion of this section? (1 point, we need the Eliteness to stay sacred)
Have you finally figured out what RC is for? (1 URC, because this is not the last question and you deserve it)
Other test versions
Have you taken the standard test? (10)
Have you taken the legacy test? (30)
Have you taken the modern test? (50, and 1 Eliteness)
... and not as a joke? (5 Eliteness, and a mental checkup)
Did you actually finish it? (1000)
Have you edited the standard test? (20)
Have you edited the legacy test? (10)
Have you edited the modern test? (1)
Have you vandalized the modern test? (10 points and -5 Eliteness, how did you manage that?)
Finale
Did you actually finish this test? (100)
Did you have to redo it because you messed up your math somewhere? (50)
Have you actually taken this whole test??? (10 for dedication)
Really? (11)
Positive? (12)
Or are you lying? (-99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999, and get out asap.)
Interpreting your score
Please round your score down to the nearest interval (round up if negative). Scores in red are negative, green is zero, black is positive, and dark blue is legendary. If you thought the red text signified broken links, and were about to attempt fixing them, add 10 to your score. If you found out that they are actually clickable and DID fix them add 25. If you realized they weren't clickable after all because the person before you fixed it and you fixed it back again add another 50. Add another 50 if you just pressed the undo button on the page history. And you can remove 10 if you actually made a red link. Add 10 if you fixed that red link. Add 20 if you found out that you didn't make a red link, but a question. If you thought the blue text signified links, and were about to attempt delinking them, subtract 10 from your score. If they were links, and you fixed them, add 10 to your score. Note that vandalism generally affects eliteness, and not your score. Add 10 to your score if you read this paragraph completely.
Score
Result
-1000 and below
You are either Willy on Wheels or are a liar.
-100
You strongly dislike Wikipedia. Below this score is almost impossible.
A well-balanced attitude that may benefit by spending more time on Wikipedia.
300
You have normal experience with Wikipedia.
400
Congratulations, you are in the optimal range for editing with Wikipedia!
500
You are slightly overdoing yourself. Take a wikibreak for a few days.
600
You are addicted to Wikipedia.
800
You are highly addicted to Wikipedia. Please take a break.
1,000
You are a Wikipediholic.
1,500
You are at the stage of advanced Wikipediholism. Please see a doctor.
2,500
The effects of Wikipediholism at this stage cannot be cured. Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia with such vigor, you will indirectly block others from editing.
5,000
You are the ultimate Wikipediholic! Congratulations! Now, get back to editing (What are you doing here? Work!)
10,000
Scores in this range are usually fatal.
30,000
You either played a part in creating Wikipedia or are a ghost. Good job!
WP:AGF and
WP:NPA forbid us from accusing you of cheating at this test.
Interpreting your eliteness
Eliteness signifies how elite you are. It also signifies how dedicated you are to Wikipedia and other parts of your life. A high score generally means that you are likable. A low score means that you are probably a vandal. This is colored magenta if positive, spring green if negative, azure if zero, and other colors if legendary or anti-legendary.
Score
Result
-25 Eliteness (Anti-Legendary)
You are the worst vandal in existence, including the other planes. You vandalize Wikipedia at levels that even
Willy on Wheels could never manage it, and
the supreme overlord of the universe plans to destroy you to stop your nuclear bomb strength vandalism.
-10 Eliteness
You are a super mega extreme abusive vandal/troll/disruptive editor, a wikiterrorist, a
liar (check your pants to see if they are not on fire), or you have been blocked a lot.
-5 Eliteness
You are an extremely evil/abusive vandal/troll, a wikiterrorist, a liar who calls him or her self "The Jimbo Wales", or you thought this test was a complete/total/utter waste of time.
-4 Eliteness
You are a really evil
vandal. You will probably be blocked.
-3 Eliteness
You always do
WP:BLP violations, lots of edit-warring, and about 50% to 65% of your edits are vandalism.
You likely have no intention of helping Wikipedia.
0 Eliteness
You are regular in the Eliteness axis.
1 Eliteness
You are a leet Wikipediholic, or an elite normal user with a life.
2 Eliteness
You are an elite Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for rollback rights.
3 Eliteness
You are a 1337 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for RfA.
4 Eliteness
You are a 9001 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for RfB.
5 Eliteness
You are a 31337 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for steward.
10 Eliteness
You are just elite. This is what Jimbo Wales had.
25 Eliteness (Legendary)
You are elite like Chuck Norris.
100 Eliteness
There is no way to describe this level of eliteness.
Interpreting your RC
RC is a very rare artifact currency that signifies mythicalness. Negative RC is possible due to the existence of
antimatter. A high RC balance indicates a true hero. A high RC debt indicates a vile beast. What RC stands for is unknown, but rumors say it stands for Rare Coins.
Score
Result
-5 RC
You are the anti-Chuck Norris.
-3 RC
You have caused a bomb to explode in your computer.
-1 RC
You have transgressed.
0 RC
You are normal.
1 RC
You are valorous.
2 RC
You are good.
3 RC
You are a hero.
4 RC
You are a 1337 hero.
5 RC
You are a true hero.
7 RC
You are Hercules.
10 RC
You are the saviour of the world from a killer Kim Jong-un who dropped a billion nukes on Wikipedia!!!1
25 RC
You are the saviour of the universe from just about everything bad that will happen.
Interpreting your URC
URC can be used to multiply your points, Eliteness, or RC values since URC have not been studied.
1 URC can give you a x1000 points multiplier, a x10 Eliteness multiplier, or a x2 RC multiplier. Buying multiples stack, so 2 points multipliers give x1000000, 2 eliteness multipliers give x100, and 2 RC multipliers give x4.
URC multipliers act differently with negative scores. Buying a points multiplier on a negative score is x0, a Eliteness multiplier on negative Eliteness is x0.1, and a RC multiplier on negative RC is x0.5
If you have negative URC, you must buy a x0 points multiplier, a x0.1 Eliteness multiplier, or a x0.5 RC multiplier on positive scores.
If you have negative URC and negative scores, a x1000 points multiplier for negative points, a x10 Eliteness multiplier for negative eliteness, and a x2 RC multiplier for negative RC may be bought, but you must use up all negative URC.
URC can be used to multiply your
bitcoin or
dogecoin as well if you are still
hodling those.
This user has taken the
Wikipediholism test.Version: User:Pythoncoder/test/test Revision ID:
- Score: 735 Eliteness: 9.001 Rare Coins: 2 Ultra Rare Coins: 1
Great job! You can use the {{User:pythoncoder/Wikipediholic}} template to display your score on your userpage. Entering the code below produces the userbox on the right:
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
If you have a coffee-stained mug similar to this example here, you may be spending a little bit too much time on Wikipedia. Why not spend some more and take this test?Car of Polish Wikipediholic; If you have a car with "??.wikipedia.org," you will spend too much time on WP.If you have a keyboard similar to this example here, you might be spending too much time pressing "Wikipedia."
This is a modified version of the
Wikipediholism test. It combines questions from the main and legacy tests in order to provide a more complete diagnosis of whether you're a Wikipediholic. There are 692 questions as of rev. 821953992. As long as we're going with
Magic: the Gathering format names, I might as well call it the Extended version.
If you're not sure whether you are a
Wikipediholic or are unsure about the amount of
Wikipedihol you took, then you should take this test. Give yourself at least 15 minutes because there are around 700 questions. The point value of answering "yes" to each question is listed in parentheses ( ) at the end of the question. The higher the result, the more Wikipedihol you had!
If you have extra time, try the bonus sections to measure your Eliteness and RC. If you see URC anywhere, it is a lie and should be reported to the Universe Police.
Suggestions for new questions and modifications are of course welcome—good questions are those that measure current
addiction (e.g., "have you edited a page in the last week?", not "have you ever edited a page?"), on the hypothesis that Wikipediholicism can be cured, or at least controlled to some degree. New questions should be added as #ENTRY (point value, additional notes).
Standard,
legacy, and
modern versions are also available.
The test
Starter
Please be honest! We don't like liars!
Will you do this test? (1, we know you will)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia? (1)
How often you use Wikipedia
Do you typically use Wikipedia at least once a week? (1)
...at least once a day? (2)
Do you typically use Wikipedia for more than an hour a day? (4)
Is more than 60% of your time online spent at Wikipedia? (10)
...80%? (50)
...exactly 100%? (100)
Have you made more than 100 edits in a month? (12)
...1,000? (24)
...5,000? (48)
...10,000? (96)
...More than 20,000? (96)
Have you made more than 500 total edits? (1)
...1,000? (2)
...5,000? (4)
...10,000? (8)
...50,000? (16)
Have you reached your 50% of your previous number of edits per month? (-5, but it's probably for the best)
100%? (1)
200%? (5)
Do you have Wikipedia bookmarked? (4)
Is Wikipedia set as your home page? (15)
Is Wikipedia in your browser's search bar? (9)
Did a Wikipedia page end up in your "most visited pages" list? (2)
In the top rank? (10)
Was it this test? (10)
Have you had Wikipedia open in more than one window/tab at a time? (2)
More than five? (5, OH!)
More than ten? (12, DANG!!)
Have you used Wikipedia on more than one
browser at a time? (16)
Is one of those browsers
Internet Explorer? (-1 eliteness, switch to FirefoxChromeOperaanything (just not IE!) immediately)
Do you think you're using a significant portion of Wikipedia's
bandwidth? (5)
From how many locations or devices did you visit Wikipedia the past 30 days? (1 per machine)
Where you use Wikipedia
Do you read Wikipedia over a public wireless Internet connection? (2)
Do you edit Wikipedia articles while over such a connection? (4)
Is that connection in a restaurant? (6)
...Do you edit Wikipedia while waiting for your meal? (8)
...During your meal? (20)
...While eating? (25)
...One hand on the keyboard, and one on your food? (100—that's it, we're driving you down to the next Wikiclinic for treatment.)
Do you stop eating to edit Wikipedia and then throw your meal away, because it spoiled while you were editing? (50—you're a junkie)
Did you pick that restaurant because of the free WiFi? (5)
Do you use Wikipedia when you are waiting for a flight? (10)
Are you on an aircraft with wireless access to the Internet during flight? (5)
...because you can edit on Wikipedia on it? (25)
Are you eating your meal on said flight while taking this test or writing an article? (50)
Did you choose this flight over another because of the access to Wikipedia? (100 plus a point for every $10 more you paid for this flight than the one you would have taken)
Have you ever edited an article on Wikipedia while paying long distance charges to connect to the Internet? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia while taking a bath because you found it made the experience even more relaxing? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia in different countries? (5)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia from Soviet Russia? (10)
While in Soviet Russia, Did Wikipedia Edit YOU!!? (50)
Did you travel to Soviet Russia just to edit Wikipedia from there? (-5, Sorry no reimbursements on flights)
Devices used to edit Wikipedia
Do you edit Wikipedia on a laptop? (1)
Did your laptop's fan go on by itself while you were on Wikipedia? (2)
Did your laptop melt (or show serious signs of melting) while you were editing Wikipedia? (100 points and a new computer fan)
Do you edit Wikipedia with a mobile phone or tablet? (2)
...Because you can't wait until you get access to a PC to add some obscure fact to Wikipedia? (4)
If you have any devices that run on
iOS, do you own the Official Wikipedia app? (2)
Did you just buy an
iPod Touch/
iPad/
iPhone just to get the wiki app? (16, impressive)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia on a video game system? (10 for each one)
Have you bought a second monitor so you could edit Wikipedia more efficiently? (25)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia so much that you broke your computer and had to buy a new one? (1000, very addicted)
When you use Wikipedia
Are you not getting enough sleep because of time on Wikipedia? (9)
Are you sleeping during the day (as of 8 AM) because you edited Wikipedia overnight? (5 points, plus overslept time in hours)
Do you forget to think twice before you say something to real people but re-check a hundred times what you have typed in before posting your comment in a talk page? (5)
After reading the last question, did you give yourself 13 points because it is always 4, 6, or 8 a.m. somewhere? (13 for cleverness :))
Do you edit Wikipedia at night (i.e. after midnight) consuming drinks to keep you up? (2)
Do you hold Wikipedia Nights, that is, nights when you intentionally go to bed late, after spending n hours editing Wikipedia? (5)
Do you get people to join you in such an event? (10)
Do you edit articles in your sleep? (17)
When you wake up in the night and can't get back to sleep due to some nagging worry do you get up and start working on Wikipedia so that you will get tired and have something relaxing to fill your mind when you go back to bed? (2)
...Did it work? (40)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia during a thunderstorm? (50 and 1 eliteness, very risky though)
Have you ever edited Wikipedia when you were in a
hurricane? (100, super risky, and the window of your house could have broken)
... editing the article about the hurricane? (10 for your contribution to
current events)
... creating the article about the hurricane? (20, even better)
Has your Wikipedia contribution style/philosophy (ex. WikiGnome, deletionism, anti-deletionism,...) shaped your real life personality and philosophy? (15)
Do you judge people you know in "real life" partly on the basis of their Wikipedia contributions? (6)
Do you think quality of contributions to Wikipedia is an important criterion in choosing a partner for a close relationship? (17 and a crash course in dating)
Have you ever met another Wikipedian in "real life"? (2)
Have you ever browsed Wikipedia while communicating with your significant other? (5)
Have you told your significant other something on Wikipedia while communicating with them? (10)
...Was he or she impressed? (5)
...Or bored? (-5)
...Or did he or she tell you to shut up? (-20)
Have you ever argued with anyone over Wikipedia's accuracy? (5)
...Did you win? (10)
...Did you win, but you were the one saying it was not accurate? (-15)
Do you find yourself caught up in Wikipedia discussions a lot? (14)
...more than real-life discussions? (36)
Has anyone ever called you a "Walking Wikipedia"? (20)
Did you get the knowledge that resulted in this title from "reliable" non-Wikimedia sources? (-20, have more faith)
Do you regularly use Wikipedia as a metaphor for life ("Hmm, I shouldn't have gone to a level three warning there")? (50)
Have you ever recommended Wikipedia to any of your real family or friends? (4)
Did they join Wikipedia and contribute? (8, for each person)
Education
Have you ever missed a deadline for a school/work assignment because you were too busy editing Wikipedia? (15)
Have you learned a new language or improved in one you already knew for the primary purpose of being able to read the Wikipedia in that language? (6)
...Or for some other reason, such as picking it up where you left it x-many years ago? (2)
Have you ever used Wikipedia to further school or work related projects? (10, good for you)
Do you sneak mobile devices into class because you want to read or edit Wikipedia? (40)
...Did the teacher catch you using your mobile device and punish you? (20)
...Or did the teacher commend you for reading/editing Wikipedia? (100)
...Because the teacher is a Wikipedian? (55)
Have you spent time editing Wikipedia instead of working on an essay or important written assignment? (3, plus half the percentage of points you missed on that assignment)
... In class? (5)
Have you ever failed a class because of Wikipedia? (We will pass you! 100)
When writing something for school or work, do you often start trying to add internal links (or other Wiki formatting code) to it? (50)
Are you late to school because you are too busy editing Wikipedia? (25, but show some discipline!)
Wikibreaks
Have you taken a
WikiBreak and you were "successful"? (-20)
... or did you come back immediately during your Wikibreak? (20)
... but pretended it still counted because you only checked your watchlist and did not edit? (5)
Have you ever publicly declared that you've quit Wikipedia but found yourself lingering about anyway? (7)
Have you ever used the
Javascript Wikibreak Enforcer, because you knew you wouldn't be able to stay away otherwise? (30)
Did you panic as soon as you hit the save key after setting it? (20)
Have you ever attempted to leave Wikipedia for good? (-100, mean)
... then have someone correct a slip you made in the article? (5)
Did you call the book Main Page? (-1 eliteness, for making disambiguation a mess)
Did you get very upset that Wikipedia was going to be closed down on January 18 2012? (50)
As the closure only applied to the English language Wikipedia, did you make sure that you knew of Wikipedias in other languages to get you through January 18 2012, mentioned on
List of Wikipedias? (50)
Did you go through the tedious process of typing ?banner=none after every url you visited? (100, you're really dedicated to the cause)
Are you depressed that there aren't enough questions in the test? (30, seriously?)
Were you distracted by other Wikipedia pages for at least 15 minutes while you were taking this test? (10)
... 30 minutes? (30)
... an hour? (50)
Are you going to edit this test once you're finished? (10)
... to correct an error you saw? (5)
... or to add a new question or two? (15)
... or to get a better score? (-100, cheater)
Did you follow a link on this test... (2)
Did you edit the page the link went to? (5)
...enough to become a featured article? (100)
Are you using this test as a To Do list? (5)
... Because you want to improve your score? (-15, cheater)
... Because you want to learn more about Wikipedia? (15)
... Because you feel it fills vital gaps in your wiki knowledge? (30)
Have you taken this test more than once? (5)
... did your score increase from last time? (10)
Do you think this test is a waste of time? (-1000, definitely not a Wikipediholic)
Did you create this test? (2000)
Did you skip any questions? (-100)
Have you spotted a typo above and now have a crushing urge to edit that typo but dare not edit it for you won't remember where you read up to? (3)
Did you immediately think of ways to improve this test, or adjust the scores so that they neatly add up to 100? (3.14)
Do you think your score is too high and maybe you'll do something about it after "a few more edits"? (6)
Do you have
NPOV issues with the negative score attributed to the previous questions? (5)
Did you create an
automated version of this test so you wouldn't have to add up your score? (100)
Have you ever taken this test more than once simply to correspond with the most recent version? (12)
Did you think of adding the {{clarification needed}} to any of the questions to know how they are worth the points given to them? (4)
Are you distraught because you cannot edit Wikipedia while you take this test? (100)
Do you take this test seriously? (10)
Did you have fun taking the test? (20, we're glad you did)
Did you laugh while taking the test? (5, for your sense of humor)
Do you want 10 points? (10)
... do you argue that this question isn't fair, because non-Wikipediholics might also want 10 points? (10)
... or do you argue that since high scores are an indicator of Wikipediholism, anyone who wanted more points on this test must be a Wikipediholic? (10)
Eliteness Section
Did somebody tell you you were elite? (1 eliteness)
Do you think points are a better system than Eliteness? (50 points, but -1 Eliteness)
Or do you think Eliteness is a better system than points? (2 Eliteness, but -25 points)
Or do you think they both are great? (25 points and 1 Eliteness, you deserve it)
Or you consider Eliteness as bonus points to questions? (10 points and 2 eliteness)
Are you complaining about point inflation? (-1000000000, but 1 Eliteness)
Are you complaining about point deflation? (1, and 1 eliteness)
Are you still complaining about
Deflategate? (-213 points, and -12 eliteness)
Do you own at least 1
indie game? (10 points, try harder)
... 3? (1 Eliteness, great)
... 7? (3 Eliteness, I support your decision to support independent creators)
... 15? (5 Eliteness, you must have money or
Steam)
... 25?! (10 Eliteness, WOW)
Do you like the expansion of this section? (1 point, we need the Eliteness to stay sacred)
Have you finally figured out what RC is for? (1 URC, because this is not the last question and you deserve it)
Other test versions
Have you taken the standard test? (10)
Have you taken the legacy test? (30)
Have you taken the modern test? (50, and 1 Eliteness)
... and not as a joke? (5 Eliteness, and a mental checkup)
Did you actually finish it? (1000)
Have you edited the standard test? (20)
Have you edited the legacy test? (10)
Have you edited the modern test? (1)
Have you vandalized the modern test? (10 points and -5 Eliteness, how did you manage that?)
Finale
Did you actually finish this test? (100)
Did you have to redo it because you messed up your math somewhere? (50)
Have you actually taken this whole test??? (10 for dedication)
Really? (11)
Positive? (12)
Or are you lying? (-99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999, and get out asap.)
Interpreting your score
Please round your score down to the nearest interval (round up if negative). Scores in red are negative, green is zero, black is positive, and dark blue is legendary. If you thought the red text signified broken links, and were about to attempt fixing them, add 10 to your score. If you found out that they are actually clickable and DID fix them add 25. If you realized they weren't clickable after all because the person before you fixed it and you fixed it back again add another 50. Add another 50 if you just pressed the undo button on the page history. And you can remove 10 if you actually made a red link. Add 10 if you fixed that red link. Add 20 if you found out that you didn't make a red link, but a question. If you thought the blue text signified links, and were about to attempt delinking them, subtract 10 from your score. If they were links, and you fixed them, add 10 to your score. Note that vandalism generally affects eliteness, and not your score. Add 10 to your score if you read this paragraph completely.
Score
Result
-1000 and below
You are either Willy on Wheels or are a liar.
-100
You strongly dislike Wikipedia. Below this score is almost impossible.
A well-balanced attitude that may benefit by spending more time on Wikipedia.
300
You have normal experience with Wikipedia.
400
Congratulations, you are in the optimal range for editing with Wikipedia!
500
You are slightly overdoing yourself. Take a wikibreak for a few days.
600
You are addicted to Wikipedia.
800
You are highly addicted to Wikipedia. Please take a break.
1,000
You are a Wikipediholic.
1,500
You are at the stage of advanced Wikipediholism. Please see a doctor.
2,500
The effects of Wikipediholism at this stage cannot be cured. Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia with such vigor, you will indirectly block others from editing.
5,000
You are the ultimate Wikipediholic! Congratulations! Now, get back to editing (What are you doing here? Work!)
10,000
Scores in this range are usually fatal.
30,000
You either played a part in creating Wikipedia or are a ghost. Good job!
WP:AGF and
WP:NPA forbid us from accusing you of cheating at this test.
Interpreting your eliteness
Eliteness signifies how elite you are. It also signifies how dedicated you are to Wikipedia and other parts of your life. A high score generally means that you are likable. A low score means that you are probably a vandal. This is colored magenta if positive, spring green if negative, azure if zero, and other colors if legendary or anti-legendary.
Score
Result
-25 Eliteness (Anti-Legendary)
You are the worst vandal in existence, including the other planes. You vandalize Wikipedia at levels that even
Willy on Wheels could never manage it, and
the supreme overlord of the universe plans to destroy you to stop your nuclear bomb strength vandalism.
-10 Eliteness
You are a super mega extreme abusive vandal/troll/disruptive editor, a wikiterrorist, a
liar (check your pants to see if they are not on fire), or you have been blocked a lot.
-5 Eliteness
You are an extremely evil/abusive vandal/troll, a wikiterrorist, a liar who calls him or her self "The Jimbo Wales", or you thought this test was a complete/total/utter waste of time.
-4 Eliteness
You are a really evil
vandal. You will probably be blocked.
-3 Eliteness
You always do
WP:BLP violations, lots of edit-warring, and about 50% to 65% of your edits are vandalism.
You likely have no intention of helping Wikipedia.
0 Eliteness
You are regular in the Eliteness axis.
1 Eliteness
You are a leet Wikipediholic, or an elite normal user with a life.
2 Eliteness
You are an elite Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for rollback rights.
3 Eliteness
You are a 1337 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for RfA.
4 Eliteness
You are a 9001 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for RfB.
5 Eliteness
You are a 31337 Wikipediholic and a prime candidate for steward.
10 Eliteness
You are just elite. This is what Jimbo Wales had.
25 Eliteness (Legendary)
You are elite like Chuck Norris.
100 Eliteness
There is no way to describe this level of eliteness.
Interpreting your RC
RC is a very rare artifact currency that signifies mythicalness. Negative RC is possible due to the existence of
antimatter. A high RC balance indicates a true hero. A high RC debt indicates a vile beast. What RC stands for is unknown, but rumors say it stands for Rare Coins.
Score
Result
-5 RC
You are the anti-Chuck Norris.
-3 RC
You have caused a bomb to explode in your computer.
-1 RC
You have transgressed.
0 RC
You are normal.
1 RC
You are valorous.
2 RC
You are good.
3 RC
You are a hero.
4 RC
You are a 1337 hero.
5 RC
You are a true hero.
7 RC
You are Hercules.
10 RC
You are the saviour of the world from a killer Kim Jong-un who dropped a billion nukes on Wikipedia!!!1
25 RC
You are the saviour of the universe from just about everything bad that will happen.
Interpreting your URC
URC can be used to multiply your points, Eliteness, or RC values since URC have not been studied.
1 URC can give you a x1000 points multiplier, a x10 Eliteness multiplier, or a x2 RC multiplier. Buying multiples stack, so 2 points multipliers give x1000000, 2 eliteness multipliers give x100, and 2 RC multipliers give x4.
URC multipliers act differently with negative scores. Buying a points multiplier on a negative score is x0, a Eliteness multiplier on negative Eliteness is x0.1, and a RC multiplier on negative RC is x0.5
If you have negative URC, you must buy a x0 points multiplier, a x0.1 Eliteness multiplier, or a x0.5 RC multiplier on positive scores.
If you have negative URC and negative scores, a x1000 points multiplier for negative points, a x10 Eliteness multiplier for negative eliteness, and a x2 RC multiplier for negative RC may be bought, but you must use up all negative URC.
URC can be used to multiply your
bitcoin or
dogecoin as well if you are still
hodling those.
This user has taken the
Wikipediholism test.Version: User:Pythoncoder/test/test Revision ID:
- Score: 735 Eliteness: 9.001 Rare Coins: 2 Ultra Rare Coins: 1
Great job! You can use the {{User:pythoncoder/Wikipediholic}} template to display your score on your userpage. Entering the code below produces the userbox on the right: