From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/info/en/?search=Rolfing

Is Rolfing a separate modality from massage?

There is significant disparity among sources discussing Rolfing as to whether it is to be including under the category of "massage" or is more appropriately described as " bodywork," "manual therapy," "manipulative therapy," "somatic education," etc - essentially any term except massage. One point of confusion is that sometimes the term "massage" is used loosely to include all tissue work, yet there are a number of modalities that object to that term yet do not mind the broader term "bodywork." Cognoscenti of alternative medicine are more likely to understand this than the general public, however. One reason for this snobbery is that the origin of the word massage is "to knead" (like masa, the Spanish word for dough), and kneading muscles is perceived as a service job, rather than a health profession. Professions that prefer the term "bodywork" are generally striving for a higher level of lasting intervention.
The Rolfing profession argues that Rolfing (aka Structural Integration or SI) has always been a separate modality, with its own legacy/culture, schools, etc. One cannot attend massage school to learn SI, or attend an SI school to learn massage. (According to IASI { http://www.theiasi.net}, there are over a dozen schools for SI, and it seems that none of them offer any non-SI training.)
On the other hand, the massage profession tends to group all touch-based bodywork under their umbrella, so sources coming from the massage world sometimes categorize Rolfing as a type of massage [1]. Sources with the broader perspective of Alternative and Complementary Medicine are more likely to group Rolfing with other modalities focused on retraining movement (such as Feldenkrais), including NIH's program, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [2].
Having read a variety of secondary sources (mostly books) while researching this article, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough disagreement on this point that the article should address this discrepancy (briefly).

What do the sources say?

Of the secondary sources I've consulted, several use the term "massage," including Daniels [3] and Carroll [4], though Carroll does make a point of mentioning that Rolfers call it "movement education" rather than "massage". Sherman [1] grouped modalities into four types: relaxation massage, clinical massage, movement re-education and energy work. It placed Rolfing in the "clinical massage" category though arguments could be made for the "movement re-education" category. In this case, the term "massage" is being used in a general sense to include all tissue work modalities, yet some would say that "clinical bodywork" would be a better choice of terminology if it is to include all such modalities. Daniels is not a highly credible source, at it provides only 1 paragraph of detail and cites no sources. Similarly, Singh [5], normally a highly credible author, provides a flippant one-sentence definition of Rolfing and no sources, so his use of the term "massage" cannot be taken very seriously.
Several sources make an effort to explain that Rolfing is not massage. Cassar [6] spends half a page explaining the difference between massage and bodywork (specifically mentioning Rolfing as an example of the latter). Gale [7] says. "Bodywork should not be equated with massage simply speaking," and includes Rolfing as a type of bodywork. Levine [8] has a paragraph on why Rolfing's lofty goals of whole-body organization make it quite distinct from Myofascial Release (though MFR has cherry-picked from Rolfing over the decades). Stillerman [9] explains that Rolfing is often mistaken for massage but that's because massage has borrowed so significantly from Rolfing, citing two early massage teachers (Al Drucker and Robert Ward DO) who studied with Dr. Rolf before launching out to teach "deep tissue massage" and "myofascial release," respectively. Deutsch [10] explains that Rolfing is exempt from some state massage laws, and mentions NCCAM's categorization.
Many other sources choose their wording to avoid the term "massage" in describing Rolfing. They say it's a "technique," "approach," or "therapy," or they simply dive into describing what it's meant to do. They also use neutral terms like "bodywork." These include Salvo [11], Knaster [12], van der Kolk [13], Dr. Rosenfeld [14], and Baer [15]. One author, Claire [16], scrupulously avoids the term "massage" during most of his 16 page description but offhandedly uses the term once. (Note that Myers [17] and Schultz [18] are Rolfers, therefore biased, but would be included in the list of authors that avoid the term "massage".)
A pattern here is that sources that have researched the topic in-depth, providing several pages or a full chapter on it, and citing a variety of sources for their material, are more likely to operate from a perspective that Rolfing is not a type of massage. However, it does remain a common public conception that Rolfing is a type of massage (or that massage and bodywork are synonymous), and therefore less well-researched sources often do use the term "massage."

How shall the article be revised?

Rather than casually using the word "massage" several places in the article, these would be removed (and rewritten with neutral wording). Instead, a short paragraph will explain the difference in perspective. Whether this would be a new section or included in an existing section, and the exact wording, is to be discussed. I propose that it be included in "Theory and practice" and be worded: "Rolfers and some experts in alternative medicine describe Rolfing as "somatic education" and use terms such as "bodywork" to describe the hands-on portion of the process. [6] [8] [7] [10] Some factions of the massage industry claim that Rolfing is a type of massage. [3] The massage tradition has drawn significantly from Rolfing, with some of Ida Rolf's students leaving to become prominent teachers of massage [9] [12]."

References already cited in current Rolfing article: [1] [3] [4] [5] [6] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [18] [7] [15] [17] [14] [16]

Sources not yet cited in Rolfing article: [2] [13]


  1. ^ a b c Sherman, Karen J.; Dixon, Marian W.; Thompson, Diana; Cherkin, Daniel C. (2006). "Development of a taxonomy to describe massage treatments for musculoskeletal pain". BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 6: 24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-24. PMC  1544351. PMID  16796753.{{ cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( link)
  2. ^ a b "Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What's In a Name?".
  3. ^ a b c Daniels, Rick; Nicoll, Leslie, eds. (2011). "Ch. 14: Complementary and Alternative Therapies". Contemporary Medical-Surgical Nursing. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. p.  306. ISBN  1439058660.
  4. ^ a b Carroll, Robert Todd (22 January 2014). "Rolfing". [[The Skeptic's Dictionary]] (Online ed.). ISBN  9780471272427. Retrieved 2014-03-03. {{ cite book}}: URL–wikilink conflict ( help)
  5. ^ a b Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008). Trick Or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W. W. Norton. p.  316. ISBN  9780393066616.
  6. ^ a b c Cassar, Mario-Paul (2004). Handbook of Clinical Massage: A Complete Guide for Students and Practitioners (2nd ed.). Churchill Livingstone. p. 48-49. ISBN  9780443073496.
  7. ^ a b c Thackery, Ellyn; Harris, Madeline, eds. (2003). The Gale Encyclopedia Of Mental Disorders. Gale. p.  153-7. ISBN  9780787657697.
  8. ^ a b c Levine, Andrew (1998). The Bodywork and Massage Sourcebook. Lowell House. p. 209-234. ISBN  9780737300987.
  9. ^ a b c Stillerman, Elaine (2009). Modalities for Massage and Bodywork. Mosby. pp. 152, 157, 329–345. ISBN  032305255X.
  10. ^ a b c Deutsch, Judith E. (2008). "The Ida Rolf Method of Structural Integration". In Deutsch, Judith E. (ed.). Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy: A Clinical Decision-Making Approach. Saunders. pp. 266–7. ISBN  0721601111.{{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default ( link)
  11. ^ a b Salvo, Susan G. (2012). Massage Therapy: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. p. 423. ISBN  1437719775.
  12. ^ a b c Knaster, Mirka (1996). Discovering the Body's Wisdom: A Comprehensive Guide to More Than Fifty Mind-Body Practices. Bantam. p. 195-208. ISBN  9780307575500.
  13. ^ a b van der Kolk, Bessel A (2006). "Foreword". In Ogden, Pat; Minton, Kekuni; Pain, Clare (eds.). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy. Norton. p. xxiii. ISBN  0393704572.
  14. ^ a b Rosenfeld, Isadore (2011). Dr. Rosenfeld's Guide to Alternative Medicine. Random House. p. 79-82. ISBN  9780307807427.
  15. ^ a b Baer, Hans (2004). Toward an Integrative Medicine: Merging Alternative Therapies with Biomedicine. Rowman Altamira. p. 164. ISBN  9780759103023.
  16. ^ a b Claire, Thomas (1995). Bodywork: What Type of Massage to Get and How to Make the Most of It. William Morrow and Co. ISBN  9781591202325.
  17. ^ a b Myers, Thomas W. (2004). "Structural integration -- Developments in Ida Rolf's 'Recipe'-- I". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 8 (2): 131–42. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00088-3.[ unreliable source?]
  18. ^ a b Schultz, Richard Louis; Feitis, Rosemary (1996). The Endless Web: Fascial Anatomy and Physical Reality. North Atlantic Books. p.  33. ISBN  1556432283.

See also:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/info/en/?search=Rolfing

Is Rolfing a separate modality from massage?

There is significant disparity among sources discussing Rolfing as to whether it is to be including under the category of "massage" or is more appropriately described as " bodywork," "manual therapy," "manipulative therapy," "somatic education," etc - essentially any term except massage. One point of confusion is that sometimes the term "massage" is used loosely to include all tissue work, yet there are a number of modalities that object to that term yet do not mind the broader term "bodywork." Cognoscenti of alternative medicine are more likely to understand this than the general public, however. One reason for this snobbery is that the origin of the word massage is "to knead" (like masa, the Spanish word for dough), and kneading muscles is perceived as a service job, rather than a health profession. Professions that prefer the term "bodywork" are generally striving for a higher level of lasting intervention.
The Rolfing profession argues that Rolfing (aka Structural Integration or SI) has always been a separate modality, with its own legacy/culture, schools, etc. One cannot attend massage school to learn SI, or attend an SI school to learn massage. (According to IASI { http://www.theiasi.net}, there are over a dozen schools for SI, and it seems that none of them offer any non-SI training.)
On the other hand, the massage profession tends to group all touch-based bodywork under their umbrella, so sources coming from the massage world sometimes categorize Rolfing as a type of massage [1]. Sources with the broader perspective of Alternative and Complementary Medicine are more likely to group Rolfing with other modalities focused on retraining movement (such as Feldenkrais), including NIH's program, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [2].
Having read a variety of secondary sources (mostly books) while researching this article, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough disagreement on this point that the article should address this discrepancy (briefly).

What do the sources say?

Of the secondary sources I've consulted, several use the term "massage," including Daniels [3] and Carroll [4], though Carroll does make a point of mentioning that Rolfers call it "movement education" rather than "massage". Sherman [1] grouped modalities into four types: relaxation massage, clinical massage, movement re-education and energy work. It placed Rolfing in the "clinical massage" category though arguments could be made for the "movement re-education" category. In this case, the term "massage" is being used in a general sense to include all tissue work modalities, yet some would say that "clinical bodywork" would be a better choice of terminology if it is to include all such modalities. Daniels is not a highly credible source, at it provides only 1 paragraph of detail and cites no sources. Similarly, Singh [5], normally a highly credible author, provides a flippant one-sentence definition of Rolfing and no sources, so his use of the term "massage" cannot be taken very seriously.
Several sources make an effort to explain that Rolfing is not massage. Cassar [6] spends half a page explaining the difference between massage and bodywork (specifically mentioning Rolfing as an example of the latter). Gale [7] says. "Bodywork should not be equated with massage simply speaking," and includes Rolfing as a type of bodywork. Levine [8] has a paragraph on why Rolfing's lofty goals of whole-body organization make it quite distinct from Myofascial Release (though MFR has cherry-picked from Rolfing over the decades). Stillerman [9] explains that Rolfing is often mistaken for massage but that's because massage has borrowed so significantly from Rolfing, citing two early massage teachers (Al Drucker and Robert Ward DO) who studied with Dr. Rolf before launching out to teach "deep tissue massage" and "myofascial release," respectively. Deutsch [10] explains that Rolfing is exempt from some state massage laws, and mentions NCCAM's categorization.
Many other sources choose their wording to avoid the term "massage" in describing Rolfing. They say it's a "technique," "approach," or "therapy," or they simply dive into describing what it's meant to do. They also use neutral terms like "bodywork." These include Salvo [11], Knaster [12], van der Kolk [13], Dr. Rosenfeld [14], and Baer [15]. One author, Claire [16], scrupulously avoids the term "massage" during most of his 16 page description but offhandedly uses the term once. (Note that Myers [17] and Schultz [18] are Rolfers, therefore biased, but would be included in the list of authors that avoid the term "massage".)
A pattern here is that sources that have researched the topic in-depth, providing several pages or a full chapter on it, and citing a variety of sources for their material, are more likely to operate from a perspective that Rolfing is not a type of massage. However, it does remain a common public conception that Rolfing is a type of massage (or that massage and bodywork are synonymous), and therefore less well-researched sources often do use the term "massage."

How shall the article be revised?

Rather than casually using the word "massage" several places in the article, these would be removed (and rewritten with neutral wording). Instead, a short paragraph will explain the difference in perspective. Whether this would be a new section or included in an existing section, and the exact wording, is to be discussed. I propose that it be included in "Theory and practice" and be worded: "Rolfers and some experts in alternative medicine describe Rolfing as "somatic education" and use terms such as "bodywork" to describe the hands-on portion of the process. [6] [8] [7] [10] Some factions of the massage industry claim that Rolfing is a type of massage. [3] The massage tradition has drawn significantly from Rolfing, with some of Ida Rolf's students leaving to become prominent teachers of massage [9] [12]."

References already cited in current Rolfing article: [1] [3] [4] [5] [6] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [18] [7] [15] [17] [14] [16]

Sources not yet cited in Rolfing article: [2] [13]


  1. ^ a b c Sherman, Karen J.; Dixon, Marian W.; Thompson, Diana; Cherkin, Daniel C. (2006). "Development of a taxonomy to describe massage treatments for musculoskeletal pain". BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 6: 24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-24. PMC  1544351. PMID  16796753.{{ cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( link)
  2. ^ a b "Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What's In a Name?".
  3. ^ a b c Daniels, Rick; Nicoll, Leslie, eds. (2011). "Ch. 14: Complementary and Alternative Therapies". Contemporary Medical-Surgical Nursing. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. p.  306. ISBN  1439058660.
  4. ^ a b Carroll, Robert Todd (22 January 2014). "Rolfing". [[The Skeptic's Dictionary]] (Online ed.). ISBN  9780471272427. Retrieved 2014-03-03. {{ cite book}}: URL–wikilink conflict ( help)
  5. ^ a b Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008). Trick Or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W. W. Norton. p.  316. ISBN  9780393066616.
  6. ^ a b c Cassar, Mario-Paul (2004). Handbook of Clinical Massage: A Complete Guide for Students and Practitioners (2nd ed.). Churchill Livingstone. p. 48-49. ISBN  9780443073496.
  7. ^ a b c Thackery, Ellyn; Harris, Madeline, eds. (2003). The Gale Encyclopedia Of Mental Disorders. Gale. p.  153-7. ISBN  9780787657697.
  8. ^ a b c Levine, Andrew (1998). The Bodywork and Massage Sourcebook. Lowell House. p. 209-234. ISBN  9780737300987.
  9. ^ a b c Stillerman, Elaine (2009). Modalities for Massage and Bodywork. Mosby. pp. 152, 157, 329–345. ISBN  032305255X.
  10. ^ a b c Deutsch, Judith E. (2008). "The Ida Rolf Method of Structural Integration". In Deutsch, Judith E. (ed.). Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy: A Clinical Decision-Making Approach. Saunders. pp. 266–7. ISBN  0721601111.{{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default ( link)
  11. ^ a b Salvo, Susan G. (2012). Massage Therapy: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. p. 423. ISBN  1437719775.
  12. ^ a b c Knaster, Mirka (1996). Discovering the Body's Wisdom: A Comprehensive Guide to More Than Fifty Mind-Body Practices. Bantam. p. 195-208. ISBN  9780307575500.
  13. ^ a b van der Kolk, Bessel A (2006). "Foreword". In Ogden, Pat; Minton, Kekuni; Pain, Clare (eds.). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy. Norton. p. xxiii. ISBN  0393704572.
  14. ^ a b Rosenfeld, Isadore (2011). Dr. Rosenfeld's Guide to Alternative Medicine. Random House. p. 79-82. ISBN  9780307807427.
  15. ^ a b Baer, Hans (2004). Toward an Integrative Medicine: Merging Alternative Therapies with Biomedicine. Rowman Altamira. p. 164. ISBN  9780759103023.
  16. ^ a b Claire, Thomas (1995). Bodywork: What Type of Massage to Get and How to Make the Most of It. William Morrow and Co. ISBN  9781591202325.
  17. ^ a b Myers, Thomas W. (2004). "Structural integration -- Developments in Ida Rolf's 'Recipe'-- I". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 8 (2): 131–42. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00088-3.[ unreliable source?]
  18. ^ a b Schultz, Richard Louis; Feitis, Rosemary (1996). The Endless Web: Fascial Anatomy and Physical Reality. North Atlantic Books. p.  33. ISBN  1556432283.

See also:


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook