This is the user
sandbox of
Karinpower. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's
user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox
here.
Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!
There is significant disparity among sources discussing Rolfing as to whether it is to be including under the category of "massage" or is more appropriately described as "
bodywork," "manual therapy," "manipulative therapy," "somatic education," etc - essentially any term except massage. One point of confusion is that sometimes the term "massage" is used loosely to include all tissue work, yet there are a number of modalities that object to that term yet do not mind the broader term "bodywork." Cognoscenti of alternative medicine are more likely to understand this than the general public, however. One reason for this snobbery is that the
origin of the word massage is "to knead" (like masa, the Spanish word for dough), and kneading muscles is perceived as a service job, rather than a health profession. Professions that prefer the term "bodywork" are generally striving for a higher level of lasting intervention.
The Rolfing profession argues that Rolfing (aka Structural Integration or SI) has always been a separate modality, with its own legacy/culture, schools, etc. One cannot attend massage school to learn SI, or attend an SI school to learn massage. (According to IASI {
http://www.theiasi.net}, there are over a dozen schools for SI, and it seems that none of them offer any non-SI training.)
On the other hand, the massage profession tends to group all touch-based bodywork under their umbrella, so sources coming from the massage world sometimes categorize Rolfing as a type of massage [1]. Sources with the broader perspective of Alternative and Complementary Medicine are more likely to group Rolfing with other modalities focused on retraining movement (such as Feldenkrais), including NIH's program, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [2].
Having read a variety of secondary sources (mostly books) while researching this article, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough disagreement on this point that the article should address this discrepancy (briefly).
What do the sources say?
Of the secondary sources I've consulted, several use the term "massage," including Daniels[3] and Carroll[4], though Carroll does make a point of mentioning that Rolfers call it "movement education" rather than "massage". Sherman [1] grouped modalities into four types: relaxation massage, clinical massage, movement re-education and energy work. It placed Rolfing in the "clinical massage" category though arguments could be made for the "movement re-education" category. In this case, the term "massage" is being used in a general sense to include all tissue work modalities, yet some would say that "clinical bodywork" would be a better choice of terminology if it is to include all such modalities. Daniels is not a highly credible source, at it provides only 1 paragraph of detail and cites no sources. Similarly, Singh[5], normally a highly credible author, provides a flippant one-sentence definition of Rolfing and no sources, so his use of the term "massage" cannot be taken very seriously.
Several sources make an effort to explain that Rolfing is not massage. Cassar[6] spends half a page explaining the difference between massage and bodywork (specifically mentioning Rolfing as an example of the latter). Gale[7] says. "Bodywork should not be equated with massage simply speaking," and includes Rolfing as a type of bodywork. Levine [8] has a paragraph on why Rolfing's lofty goals of whole-body organization make it quite distinct from Myofascial Release (though MFR has cherry-picked from Rolfing over the decades). Stillerman[9] explains that Rolfing is often mistaken for massage but that's because massage has borrowed so significantly from Rolfing, citing two early massage teachers (Al Drucker and Robert Ward DO) who studied with Dr. Rolf before launching out to teach "deep tissue massage" and "myofascial release," respectively. Deutsch [10] explains that Rolfing is exempt from some state massage laws, and mentions NCCAM's categorization.
Many other sources choose their wording to avoid the term "massage" in describing Rolfing. They say it's a "technique," "approach," or "therapy," or they simply dive into describing what it's meant to do. They also use neutral terms like "bodywork." These include Salvo[11], Knaster[12], van der Kolk[13], Dr. Rosenfeld[14], and Baer[15]. One author, Claire[16], scrupulously avoids the term "massage" during most of his 16 page description but offhandedly uses the term once. (Note that Myers[17] and Schultz[18] are Rolfers, therefore biased, but would be included in the list of authors that avoid the term "massage".)
A pattern here is that sources that have researched the topic in-depth, providing several pages or a full chapter on it, and citing a variety of sources for their material, are more likely to operate from a perspective that Rolfing is not a type of massage. However, it does remain a common public conception that Rolfing is a type of massage (or that massage and bodywork are synonymous), and therefore less well-researched sources often do use the term "massage."
How shall the article be revised?
Rather than casually using the word "massage" several places in the article, these would be removed (and rewritten with neutral wording). Instead, a short paragraph will explain the difference in perspective. Whether this would be a new section or included in an existing section, and the exact wording, is to be discussed. I propose that it be included in "Theory and practice" and be worded: "Rolfers and some experts in alternative medicine describe Rolfing as "somatic education" and use terms such as "bodywork" to describe the hands-on portion of the process.[6][8][7][10] Some factions of the massage industry claim that Rolfing is a type of massage.[3] The massage tradition has drawn significantly from Rolfing, with some of Ida Rolf's students leaving to become prominent teachers of massage[9][12]."
^
abcCassar, Mario-Paul (2004). Handbook of Clinical Massage: A Complete Guide for Students and Practitioners (2nd ed.).
Churchill Livingstone. p. 48-49.
ISBN9780443073496.
^
abcThackery, Ellyn; Harris, Madeline, eds. (2003). The Gale Encyclopedia Of Mental Disorders.
Gale. p.
153-7.
ISBN9780787657697.
^
abcStillerman, Elaine (2009). Modalities for Massage and Bodywork.
Mosby. pp. 152, 157, 329–345.
ISBN032305255X.
^
abcDeutsch, Judith E. (2008). "The Ida Rolf Method of Structural Integration". In Deutsch, Judith E. (ed.). Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy: A Clinical Decision-Making Approach.
Saunders. pp. 266–7.
ISBN0721601111.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)
^
abcKnaster, Mirka (1996). Discovering the Body's Wisdom: A Comprehensive Guide to More Than Fifty Mind-Body Practices.
Bantam. p. 195-208.
ISBN9780307575500.
^
abvan der Kolk, Bessel A (2006). "Foreword". In Ogden, Pat; Minton, Kekuni; Pain, Clare (eds.). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy.
Norton. p. xxiii.
ISBN0393704572.
^
abRosenfeld, Isadore (2011). Dr. Rosenfeld's Guide to Alternative Medicine. Random House. p. 79-82.
ISBN9780307807427.
^
abMyers, Thomas W. (2004). "Structural integration -- Developments in Ida Rolf's 'Recipe'-- I". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 8 (2): 131–42.
doi:
10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00088-3.[unreliable source?]
^
abSchultz, Richard Louis; Feitis, Rosemary (1996). The Endless Web: Fascial Anatomy and Physical Reality.
North Atlantic Books. p.
33.
ISBN1556432283.
This is the user
sandbox of
Karinpower. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's
user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox
here.
Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!
There is significant disparity among sources discussing Rolfing as to whether it is to be including under the category of "massage" or is more appropriately described as "
bodywork," "manual therapy," "manipulative therapy," "somatic education," etc - essentially any term except massage. One point of confusion is that sometimes the term "massage" is used loosely to include all tissue work, yet there are a number of modalities that object to that term yet do not mind the broader term "bodywork." Cognoscenti of alternative medicine are more likely to understand this than the general public, however. One reason for this snobbery is that the
origin of the word massage is "to knead" (like masa, the Spanish word for dough), and kneading muscles is perceived as a service job, rather than a health profession. Professions that prefer the term "bodywork" are generally striving for a higher level of lasting intervention.
The Rolfing profession argues that Rolfing (aka Structural Integration or SI) has always been a separate modality, with its own legacy/culture, schools, etc. One cannot attend massage school to learn SI, or attend an SI school to learn massage. (According to IASI {
http://www.theiasi.net}, there are over a dozen schools for SI, and it seems that none of them offer any non-SI training.)
On the other hand, the massage profession tends to group all touch-based bodywork under their umbrella, so sources coming from the massage world sometimes categorize Rolfing as a type of massage [1]. Sources with the broader perspective of Alternative and Complementary Medicine are more likely to group Rolfing with other modalities focused on retraining movement (such as Feldenkrais), including NIH's program, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [2].
Having read a variety of secondary sources (mostly books) while researching this article, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough disagreement on this point that the article should address this discrepancy (briefly).
What do the sources say?
Of the secondary sources I've consulted, several use the term "massage," including Daniels[3] and Carroll[4], though Carroll does make a point of mentioning that Rolfers call it "movement education" rather than "massage". Sherman [1] grouped modalities into four types: relaxation massage, clinical massage, movement re-education and energy work. It placed Rolfing in the "clinical massage" category though arguments could be made for the "movement re-education" category. In this case, the term "massage" is being used in a general sense to include all tissue work modalities, yet some would say that "clinical bodywork" would be a better choice of terminology if it is to include all such modalities. Daniels is not a highly credible source, at it provides only 1 paragraph of detail and cites no sources. Similarly, Singh[5], normally a highly credible author, provides a flippant one-sentence definition of Rolfing and no sources, so his use of the term "massage" cannot be taken very seriously.
Several sources make an effort to explain that Rolfing is not massage. Cassar[6] spends half a page explaining the difference between massage and bodywork (specifically mentioning Rolfing as an example of the latter). Gale[7] says. "Bodywork should not be equated with massage simply speaking," and includes Rolfing as a type of bodywork. Levine [8] has a paragraph on why Rolfing's lofty goals of whole-body organization make it quite distinct from Myofascial Release (though MFR has cherry-picked from Rolfing over the decades). Stillerman[9] explains that Rolfing is often mistaken for massage but that's because massage has borrowed so significantly from Rolfing, citing two early massage teachers (Al Drucker and Robert Ward DO) who studied with Dr. Rolf before launching out to teach "deep tissue massage" and "myofascial release," respectively. Deutsch [10] explains that Rolfing is exempt from some state massage laws, and mentions NCCAM's categorization.
Many other sources choose their wording to avoid the term "massage" in describing Rolfing. They say it's a "technique," "approach," or "therapy," or they simply dive into describing what it's meant to do. They also use neutral terms like "bodywork." These include Salvo[11], Knaster[12], van der Kolk[13], Dr. Rosenfeld[14], and Baer[15]. One author, Claire[16], scrupulously avoids the term "massage" during most of his 16 page description but offhandedly uses the term once. (Note that Myers[17] and Schultz[18] are Rolfers, therefore biased, but would be included in the list of authors that avoid the term "massage".)
A pattern here is that sources that have researched the topic in-depth, providing several pages or a full chapter on it, and citing a variety of sources for their material, are more likely to operate from a perspective that Rolfing is not a type of massage. However, it does remain a common public conception that Rolfing is a type of massage (or that massage and bodywork are synonymous), and therefore less well-researched sources often do use the term "massage."
How shall the article be revised?
Rather than casually using the word "massage" several places in the article, these would be removed (and rewritten with neutral wording). Instead, a short paragraph will explain the difference in perspective. Whether this would be a new section or included in an existing section, and the exact wording, is to be discussed. I propose that it be included in "Theory and practice" and be worded: "Rolfers and some experts in alternative medicine describe Rolfing as "somatic education" and use terms such as "bodywork" to describe the hands-on portion of the process.[6][8][7][10] Some factions of the massage industry claim that Rolfing is a type of massage.[3] The massage tradition has drawn significantly from Rolfing, with some of Ida Rolf's students leaving to become prominent teachers of massage[9][12]."
^
abcCassar, Mario-Paul (2004). Handbook of Clinical Massage: A Complete Guide for Students and Practitioners (2nd ed.).
Churchill Livingstone. p. 48-49.
ISBN9780443073496.
^
abcThackery, Ellyn; Harris, Madeline, eds. (2003). The Gale Encyclopedia Of Mental Disorders.
Gale. p.
153-7.
ISBN9780787657697.
^
abcStillerman, Elaine (2009). Modalities for Massage and Bodywork.
Mosby. pp. 152, 157, 329–345.
ISBN032305255X.
^
abcDeutsch, Judith E. (2008). "The Ida Rolf Method of Structural Integration". In Deutsch, Judith E. (ed.). Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy: A Clinical Decision-Making Approach.
Saunders. pp. 266–7.
ISBN0721601111.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)
^
abcKnaster, Mirka (1996). Discovering the Body's Wisdom: A Comprehensive Guide to More Than Fifty Mind-Body Practices.
Bantam. p. 195-208.
ISBN9780307575500.
^
abvan der Kolk, Bessel A (2006). "Foreword". In Ogden, Pat; Minton, Kekuni; Pain, Clare (eds.). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy.
Norton. p. xxiii.
ISBN0393704572.
^
abRosenfeld, Isadore (2011). Dr. Rosenfeld's Guide to Alternative Medicine. Random House. p. 79-82.
ISBN9780307807427.
^
abMyers, Thomas W. (2004). "Structural integration -- Developments in Ida Rolf's 'Recipe'-- I". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 8 (2): 131–42.
doi:
10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00088-3.[unreliable source?]
^
abSchultz, Richard Louis; Feitis, Rosemary (1996). The Endless Web: Fascial Anatomy and Physical Reality.
North Atlantic Books. p.
33.
ISBN1556432283.