NOTE: In response to feedback regarding the username, I shall be retiring this account after exactly 21 more prods. If you care,
watch this page for my new nom de plume.
(THANK YOU to Ambi, TML1988 and FCYTravis for your feedback.)
This user account is a
sockpuppet of a known
wikipedian. It exists so this one person can segregate contributions and protect the person's anonymity. Being a sockpuppet, it cannot participate in
AfD.
Articles this account has proposed for deletion are listed
here. This account shall stop contributing once its puppeteer is revealed.
Wikipedia is not a junkyard, counter to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper. --
Improv 06:05, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not /dev/nullUninvitedCompany 20:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The proliferation of mediocrity is never its own excuse, and the absence of good information does not obviate the need for that information.Geogre 16:55, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not GoogleJFWT@lk 20:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Single-sentence "substubs" do not an encyclopedia entry make. Or, if you prefer, substubs suck. Mediocrity should not be tolerated! -
Lucky 6.9 05:51, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Roses are red/violets are blue/in Soviet Wikipedia/bad article delete you. --
Slowking Man
Wikipedia is and will always be an encyclopedia. [...] It is not a general base of knowledge. -
Anthony DiPierro
Verifiable != EnyclopedicJohnleemk 12:54, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Inclusionism is the easy option.Elf-friend 20:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not toilet paper, as opposed to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper.
165.21.154.111 08:23, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
NOTE: In response to feedback regarding the username, I shall be retiring this account after exactly 21 more prods. If you care,
watch this page for my new nom de plume.
(THANK YOU to Ambi, TML1988 and FCYTravis for your feedback.)
This user account is a
sockpuppet of a known
wikipedian. It exists so this one person can segregate contributions and protect the person's anonymity. Being a sockpuppet, it cannot participate in
AfD.
Articles this account has proposed for deletion are listed
here. This account shall stop contributing once its puppeteer is revealed.
Wikipedia is not a junkyard, counter to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper. --
Improv 06:05, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not /dev/nullUninvitedCompany 20:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The proliferation of mediocrity is never its own excuse, and the absence of good information does not obviate the need for that information.Geogre 16:55, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not GoogleJFWT@lk 20:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Single-sentence "substubs" do not an encyclopedia entry make. Or, if you prefer, substubs suck. Mediocrity should not be tolerated! -
Lucky 6.9 05:51, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Roses are red/violets are blue/in Soviet Wikipedia/bad article delete you. --
Slowking Man
Wikipedia is and will always be an encyclopedia. [...] It is not a general base of knowledge. -
Anthony DiPierro
Verifiable != EnyclopedicJohnleemk 12:54, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Inclusionism is the easy option.Elf-friend 20:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not toilet paper, as opposed to the inclusionist quote, Wikipedia is not paper.
165.21.154.111 08:23, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)