Started an edit war at
John Byrne about the insertion of irrelevant message board quotes against a clear consensus. Accused other editors of being sockpuppets of each other. Blocked by myself for 3RR violation.
I was wrong to violate the 3RR rule, but it has nothing to do with my being blocked for 12 hours this time which was completely without cause. I'm not even editing the John Byrne page anymore.
Ownership issues regarding
Roy Lichtenstein. Started an edit war over my insertion of the expand tag, objected to nearly every edit I made, and is warring over how much of a gigantic blockquote to include. Blocked by
User:Bratsche for 3RR violation.
I did not start an edit war over an expaned tag. I did question whether or not the tag was needed and disputed some of the edits Gamaliel made but even though it was a bit contentious I thought we reached a fair compromise. But thwn Gamaliel started deleting anything I did without explination. Now whenever I expend a quote he added to included the complete quote and not just an incomprehsibble frgment he deletes the change and refuses to discuss it on the talk page. As for my 3RR violation on Lichtenstein it was an accident and I'm sorry. Since Gamaliel will not discuss the situation and just reverts my edit I have to revert it back. I accidently commetted a fourth revert just barely within the 24 hour limit and got pounced on. I am sorry. It hasn't happened since.
Got into an edit war over
Rob Liefeld by repeatedly reverting to an unformatted, POV version. I locked the article due to the ongoing edit war and 198 accused me of locking the "wrong" version and taking the side of another party. I recused myself from the matter and then was accused of more of the same for not unlocking the article and allowing him to continue the edit war. Warned against trolling
Talk:Rob Liefeld by admin
User:Francs2000[8]
I was one of many people revert N. Caligon's version and yes the other version was unformated but the formated version was horriblly POV. To me an unformated fair article beats and bad but formated article. I said I would be happy to work on the good articles formating, but felt the accuarate article should be the one in place until I got a chance to fix it. Perhaps I was wrong, but it's no cause to block me now. I never did anything wrong and wasn't blocked at the time. It's only now that Gamaliel decides my opinion on what should be on the Leifeld page means I should be blocked.
Constantly uses edit summaries to troll, taunt, and air grievances.
This is a lie. I use the edit summaries to explain what and why I edit. Sometimes I don't use them at all so if anyone wants to fault me fault me for that. But do not use the to troll.
I reverted his insniuation that Michael Savaeg was a homosexual. Who's the troll here. The reverts I made where all fair. Look and see for yourselves. Gamaliel is engaged in edit wars on these pages reverting many editors without explination and is accusing me of doing what he actually does.
Attempts to stir up trouble by airing his grievances on unrelated talk pages and with unrelated new editors:
[9][10][11] Was warned about this each time and finally blocked for 12 hours for disruption and ongoing pattern of trollish behavior. Still persists in inserting himself into unrelated discussions on my talk page:
[12]
I was told that I was blocked for this edit
[13]. Gamaliel has since added the vague trollish bahavior excuse to try to defend his unjustifiable blocking of me. And now he has started a dishonest shrine to me here to accuse me of being a troll. This is a personal attack and very unfair.--
198.93.113.49 13:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Blocked for 72 hours for
redirectingDouche Bag to my user page. Protected his talk page to because s/he was using it as a forum for further insults and extended block to one week.
Started an edit war at
John Byrne about the insertion of irrelevant message board quotes against a clear consensus. Accused other editors of being sockpuppets of each other. Blocked by myself for 3RR violation.
I was wrong to violate the 3RR rule, but it has nothing to do with my being blocked for 12 hours this time which was completely without cause. I'm not even editing the John Byrne page anymore.
Ownership issues regarding
Roy Lichtenstein. Started an edit war over my insertion of the expand tag, objected to nearly every edit I made, and is warring over how much of a gigantic blockquote to include. Blocked by
User:Bratsche for 3RR violation.
I did not start an edit war over an expaned tag. I did question whether or not the tag was needed and disputed some of the edits Gamaliel made but even though it was a bit contentious I thought we reached a fair compromise. But thwn Gamaliel started deleting anything I did without explination. Now whenever I expend a quote he added to included the complete quote and not just an incomprehsibble frgment he deletes the change and refuses to discuss it on the talk page. As for my 3RR violation on Lichtenstein it was an accident and I'm sorry. Since Gamaliel will not discuss the situation and just reverts my edit I have to revert it back. I accidently commetted a fourth revert just barely within the 24 hour limit and got pounced on. I am sorry. It hasn't happened since.
Got into an edit war over
Rob Liefeld by repeatedly reverting to an unformatted, POV version. I locked the article due to the ongoing edit war and 198 accused me of locking the "wrong" version and taking the side of another party. I recused myself from the matter and then was accused of more of the same for not unlocking the article and allowing him to continue the edit war. Warned against trolling
Talk:Rob Liefeld by admin
User:Francs2000[8]
I was one of many people revert N. Caligon's version and yes the other version was unformated but the formated version was horriblly POV. To me an unformated fair article beats and bad but formated article. I said I would be happy to work on the good articles formating, but felt the accuarate article should be the one in place until I got a chance to fix it. Perhaps I was wrong, but it's no cause to block me now. I never did anything wrong and wasn't blocked at the time. It's only now that Gamaliel decides my opinion on what should be on the Leifeld page means I should be blocked.
Constantly uses edit summaries to troll, taunt, and air grievances.
This is a lie. I use the edit summaries to explain what and why I edit. Sometimes I don't use them at all so if anyone wants to fault me fault me for that. But do not use the to troll.
I reverted his insniuation that Michael Savaeg was a homosexual. Who's the troll here. The reverts I made where all fair. Look and see for yourselves. Gamaliel is engaged in edit wars on these pages reverting many editors without explination and is accusing me of doing what he actually does.
Attempts to stir up trouble by airing his grievances on unrelated talk pages and with unrelated new editors:
[9][10][11] Was warned about this each time and finally blocked for 12 hours for disruption and ongoing pattern of trollish behavior. Still persists in inserting himself into unrelated discussions on my talk page:
[12]
I was told that I was blocked for this edit
[13]. Gamaliel has since added the vague trollish bahavior excuse to try to defend his unjustifiable blocking of me. And now he has started a dishonest shrine to me here to accuse me of being a troll. This is a personal attack and very unfair.--
198.93.113.49 13:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Blocked for 72 hours for
redirectingDouche Bag to my user page. Protected his talk page to because s/he was using it as a forum for further insults and extended block to one week.