This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Las Vegas (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
As it appears your first edit was to revert verified material, I will give you a warning and explain that you do not remove past starring cast members from an Infobox. Infoboxes address all stars, see Charmed and Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series) or All in the Family as examples. Infoboxes are for knowing who starred in a series at any given point of the show, do not remove names and do not leave hostile hidden comments. This is grounds for blocking. If you feel the need to experiment on Wikipedia, feel free to do so in the sandbox. Thank you. KellyAna ( talk) 18:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
After a short bit of research, this issue is easily resolved. Per consensus, with the fiction is written in present tense policy as a guideline, all actors to star are to be listed unless the list is excessive in cases such as Lost or ER or other long running series. For television infoboxes, this was decided almost a year ago. What was also decided was years not be listed. The years at Las Vegas have been removed but all actors are listed. See [1] for any questions. As the Las Vegas list is not excessive, all names are to be listed based on prior consensus. Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 19:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
This was between C24 and I and had nothing to do with the CSI page. Who cares about CSI, I care about the false accusations and the claims of things that don't exist. IrishLass ( talk) 14:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
User:DJS24 ( talk) 11:23 16 January 2008
Changing any section while a consensus discussion is in progress is a bad faith edit. Do not change the box again until actual editors who aren't having a check user run on them comment. Your edits are disruptive and go against what has been said during the discussion. Additionally, trolling for people to help you with the discussion is against the rules. KellyAna ( talk) 04:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm adding the following back into my talk page, as I feel its related to the discussion on the Wiki. admin notice board. I removed this information earlier today....
- I would first like to thank Mangojuice for stepping into the discussion and pointing issues that needed to be addressed. Mangojuice also calmed the issue down as it was getting out of hand. I joined Wikipedia to help contribute my knowledge of television and NASCAR to the Wikipedia sites. I was also under the impression that well knowledge people worked on these sites. I found out otherwise over the course of these past days. I have been dealing with the most disrespectful, disrupted, and uncivil users that I have ever seen on an internet site. Irishlass and KellyAna have been nothing but difficult during this entire discussion. I have pointed out all my reasoning, examples, answered questions and have supported my thought process. You will see all that if you read my comments on the Las Vegas TV site. None of that was being shown at first because KellyAna and Irishlass were deleting my comments. I had to request an admin. to come in and review the situation, as you will see Mangojuices's comments and solutions regarding this issue. I'm not going to sit here and address what the actions of KellyAna and Irishlass were, as CarsGm5's comments obtain that issue. Of course right when we we're making progress with this dispute, KellyAna accused CarsGm5 and myself of being the same person, as a last resort to keep her solution standing. I hope someone looks into this matter as when they do, they will find NO connections between Cars and myself. After that dirty play by KellyAna, I have decided to no longer contribute to the Las Vegas TV Site but instead contribute to other Wiki. sites; sites that will have rational, well knowledge editors that argue discussions that right way by showing facts, not by taking dirty actions. With that said, I hope this discussion regarding the infobox stays open and other editors/admins contribute to the discussion, as my comments are noted and shown to help move the process alone. I will also make sure my comments stay posted, as hours of debating with troublemakers, shouldn't be removed. I will also make sure this message stays up under a different heading, as I want the reason I'm no longer contributing to that page shown to the admins looking into the issue. Once again, thank you Mangojuice/CasGm5 for stepping in and taking control of the issue. I hope to see you on other Wiki. sites. DJS --
DJS24 (
talk) 09:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Just wanted to let you know that copyrighted images (like
Image:HendrickMSLogo.gif and
Image:Brothers & Sisters title card.jpg) cannot be used in userpages, you have to remove them. By the way, sorry for not helping you out with the whole Las Vegas thing, i just really really hate discussing with editors that don't want to discuss, so i usually try to avoid that kind of drama. Anyway, welcome, keep on editing and i assure you there are a lot of nice people here.--
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 20:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- ::I'll get rid of them, thanks for telling me. Yeah, I'm just tired of dealing with those two on that site. --
DJS24 (
talk) 20:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- :::Just walk away, there's no need to get stressed out about it. :) --
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 20:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- ::::I need to agree, there are several users that act 10x better than those two. Keep editing, and don't let them get to you. They are just low class people trying to cause problems. CARS! --
CarsGm5 (
talk) 02:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Hope it helps -- DJS24 ( talk) 06:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:2235153860.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxred93 | talk count bot 02:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't worry about it; FCY is a good admin and surely won't block you based on "spite" due to a discussion he's been pointed to without at least looking at the discussion. I'll add a link to the archived discussion for his convenience. Mango juice talk 14:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Copyrighted non-free images such as product logos and promotional materials may not be used outside of the article namespace. You may link to these images by including a colon before the image name, as in [[:image:image.jpg]], doing this will prevent the image from being rendered. For more information on non-free content and why it can't be used on WikiProject pages, please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria exemptions and the more general WP:NFCC guidelines.
When using photographs of consoles or console accessories, bear in mind that you can only use free licensed imagery. Replaceable images from press kits are not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. Luckily, there's a treasure trove of free images you may use from the Wikimedia Commons. These are located at commons:Category:Xbox 360 and commons:Category:Xbox.
Since the images used in the 360 wikiproject violate Wikipedia policies, I have removed them or replaced them with free alternatives where available. I've also removed the Microsoft logos from the relevant userbox. If these were duplicate or orphaned images, I will delete them. You are welcome to create copyright-free replacements for any deleted image, provided that they are not derivative works or trademark infringements. Please let me know if you have any further questions or if you need help with procuring free images. Regards, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 04:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:2950582604.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 22:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I asked Blackwatch21 about building the Xbox 360 portal and he said it was ok. Just wanted to make sure you knew what I'm doing; I'm not trying to take over your invention. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 05:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I think that admin was doing what had to be done when he removed those images from the page. I can't remember for sure, but I think that only free images are allowed on non-encyclopediac pages. ( fair use policy) I added existing images for the consoles, and I'm not sure that the "Made by Xbox" logo violates free-use, so I put that back as well. I'm not going to remove that pic or the "Tom Clancy's EndWar" pic on the portal, but don't be too surprised if someone else removes them again. (I can't remember if non-free images are allowed on portals.) Anyway, I asked the admin to be a little more prudent in the future when removing images, so hopefully if images get removed again, it won't wreck the whole page. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 17:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm removing references for past episodes of Las Vegas. I'd like to know why the one from last night still needs a reference when there aren't any on the episodes for Seasons 1-4 or past episodes from this season? The only references on Season 5 aren't for the airdates or proof of the title, instead refereing to NBC's green event. Anyone care to explain that? Robinepowell ( talk) 22:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
To reiterate: you may not use non-free images outside of article space. Use of X360 logos in userboxes and the WikiProject is in violation of policy. Please stop. I have nothing against your project, but I regularly monitor Wikipedia uploads for potential copyright violations. I understand that your attempts to illustrate the project page were made in good faith, but if you are going to be dealing with non-free images, you need to familiarize yourself with the WP:NFCC. Thanks, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 23:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I'll ask you, as I see your the creator of the Wikiproject Xbox. Is there anything you want me to do on the page? I have have a lot of free time to contribute to the page. Thought I ask, I don't want to ruin anything on your project. Noah!-- Noah Baurer ( talk) 19:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
As far as I know, I removed it from all the pages that is shouldn't have been on. If you want to doublecheck to make sure, this page lists all the pages on wikipedia that link to {{ xboxp}}. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 03:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I saw the "rumor" at Las Vegas but didn't remove it because it was hidden. It's cool that you did, I have no problem with that. I'm just avoiding LV because the user that reverted to his edit 6 times is now actively accusing me of being a sock puppet and totally ignoring yours and Tj21's reverts to LV. And...have you heard they might just cancel Las Vegas after this season? IrishLass ( talk) 20:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm stopping by your talk page to state that I answered your source question, which you originally addressed to KellyAna. It's there on her talk page, of course. I'll see you around. Flyer22 ( talk) 05:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
What is with Bleek25 having to have the article "his" way? He keeps adding stuff just because it's been reverted by you or me. What is up with that? Anyway, I'm bordering on 3RR, can't do more today. If you see him revert again, can you take care of it? KellyAna ( talk) 23:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
You are doing an amazing job wit Wikiproject Xbox. Its grown to 19, and if we keep this up, who know what we can accomplish! Anyway, expect more logins by me in the future. 1yodsyo1 Talk! 21:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello DJ. I came to see if you are still interested in working on this project. Me, Joelster, Inkquill and Gprince007 are hard at work here and could use some help. Two questions: Do you still want to do it and why? Respond to me as soon as you can. Johnnyauau2000 ( talk) 12:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to talk you about this as I don't think it belongs in the Template namespace. Couldn't it just be moved to a subpage of your userpage and subst'd from there? xenocidic ( talk) 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Ending run date for characters is still the year the show stops production. Even though it is in syndication, 2008 is the end date for the characters. "Present" refers only to filming, not shown on air. Thanks for understanding. IrishLass ( talk)
Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.
Melon‑ Bot ( STOP!) 22:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't be the right person to apologize to. :) However, if you'd like, it would be a mark of maturity if you would review your past comments and delete anything which you think was uncivil or an attack. As for KellyAna's comments to you, I don't review every single thing she says, so if you see her saying something that is uncivil, the best way to deal with it is to point it out, either on the page where she says it, or to post on her talkpage with a diff of what she said. Or look at it this way. If you said something to someone else (I'll call him Joe, just to have a name), and Joe thought you were rude, how would you want him to deal with it? To be rude back at you, or to go to an admin and demand they did something to you? Or would you want Joe to just come to you and tell you that he had a problem, and give you a pointer to the exact thing you said, so that you'd have an opportunity to review it and try to work things out with him? I think most people would want that last option. -- El on ka 01:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello there, I see you are on the 24 WikiProject. It's been quite dead for some time now, and me personally, I intend to revive it. I considered maybe even a 24 Portal, i see the project founder hasn't been on Wikipedia for nearly a year. What are your thoughts on the project? Are you still interested in it? And would you help revive it? Let me know, I would intend to help out a lot, maybe "take over" the founders position, well not take over, but possibly help lead the project? Was just a thought and I wanted your input. My talk page would be the best place. Cheers, Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 19:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Note, the above message is what Steve Crossin asked me to say to you.
The
Helpful
One
(Review) 18:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Also a note, I've created a portal. But we should focus on the project first, I think. Just wondering, was it you who redesigned the page? Not bad. :) Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 01:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a lot of ideas, I kinda do things without asking. I hope you don't mind. Thanks DJS -- DJS24 ( talk) 01:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Sure, I don't mind. Just don't do any page blanking, OK? :P But, there are a few things I'd like to change with the project, it's all to improve the article quality, there's a list in "Goals". Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 01:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Holly.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Based on your instuctions, I made your signature.
1. Go to peferences
2. Enter this into signature bar: '''<b><font color="black">[[User:DJS24|DJS]]</font></b><b><font color="navy">[[User talk:DJS24|24]]</font></b> '''
3. Save
BW21. --
Black
Watch
21 02:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Here. Flyer22 ( talk) 20:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Did they give a main reason for deleting the logo? I couldn't find the link to the deletion report. NOAH! -- Noah Baurer ( talk) 21:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I found something that might be useful to our logo dispute. [6]. BW21. -- Black Watch 21 00:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry about that little thing yesterday. I've been kind of stressed out in RL and the image being deleted and that admin requesting that the lists of funny vandalisms be deleted kind of put me over the top and I overreacted. I am now back and I'm sorry about that. I will try to make a new logo that looks similar to the old one but is not copyrightable. It won't be quite as good, but it's better than nothing. I'll probably have it up sometime this weekend, but I'm not sure exactly when because I do have some stuff going on in RL. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 23:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC) P.S. I'm also posting this on Blackwatch and xenocidic's talk pages. P.P.S Just wanted to say that the admin on Commons was correct in deleting the image. It did count as a derivative work. I just wasn't sure where the line was drawn and apparently I guessed wrong.
Can you please review this RFC and make comment. There is a campaign to harass me from editing, and I believe my edits are being mis-represented. If you have a moment, can you please have a look.
Thank-you. Wageslave ( talk) 23:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow! Thanks a lot! I have to admit I never expected to get that barnstar.... I really appreciate it. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 01:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 01:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Image workshop. Bottom of the page.-- Black Watch 21 17:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:DTTR. I accept we may disagree on the edit but issuing me with a vandalism warning is at least violating WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. If you have a problem with an edit then I am always open to reasonable discussion. If you are interested in resolving this issue amicably (as I know I am) then handing out warnings over good faith and perfectly reasonable edits, is not that way to go about things. ( Emperor ( talk) 20:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC))
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. That template is not needed or required. Showing that template, shows your looking for help or trolling for users to support your concensus. Please see WP:Troll Brian Boru is awesome ( talk) 21:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Over and out, big guy. lol. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 05:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, DJS24. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#New process page?. Thank you. – xeno ( talk) 16:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Shut up Dan, oh by the way definite movie to see. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 20:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
It's just you. But besides that I, of course, looked at the discussion before deleting. This was a hard decision but in the end I was more convinced of User:Suntag's comments than the others. Closing a discussion is not about counting votes and I have no reason to care about the fact that Suntag's account is no more then a few months old. Also, of course it had an open discussion, so I went to work at PUI, closed the discussion as delete and accordingly deleted the image. Where exactly, besides the fact you don't agree with the result, is that against policy? That is how every discussion gets closed on Wikipedia. Where exactly was the discussion that a Commons administrator has no problem with the image? I did do some homework before deleting and saw this debate at Commons, I assume about the same image. That discussion also closed as delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Bummer if you got your feelings hurt, but frankly, listing Banfield as Mr. Banfield when you know he's got a first name (and I question that you did despite your assertion to the contrary) is just silly. Characters' names are always listed first-and-last. If you don't know them both, leave it for someone who does. I've also reverted your petty revision of my editing (get your own back, did you?) since you took a grammatically correct sentence with Wyle's name as a subordinate clause and changed it to a grammatically incorrect one. I'd suggest, again, that you check what you're doing before editing, but I don't want any more fuss over this. Drmargi ( talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Phonelabel vandalised Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Klaksonn (2nd nomination)... not sure if I should revert. Mild vandalism, admittedly - he changed my name to a boy's name and added something in the Conclusion section -, but sort of idiotic to vandalise a sockpuppet case page about your User handle... He now also listed his handle as "retired", though that remains to be seen. the Ogress smash! 19:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Las Vegas (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
As it appears your first edit was to revert verified material, I will give you a warning and explain that you do not remove past starring cast members from an Infobox. Infoboxes address all stars, see Charmed and Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series) or All in the Family as examples. Infoboxes are for knowing who starred in a series at any given point of the show, do not remove names and do not leave hostile hidden comments. This is grounds for blocking. If you feel the need to experiment on Wikipedia, feel free to do so in the sandbox. Thank you. KellyAna ( talk) 18:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
After a short bit of research, this issue is easily resolved. Per consensus, with the fiction is written in present tense policy as a guideline, all actors to star are to be listed unless the list is excessive in cases such as Lost or ER or other long running series. For television infoboxes, this was decided almost a year ago. What was also decided was years not be listed. The years at Las Vegas have been removed but all actors are listed. See [1] for any questions. As the Las Vegas list is not excessive, all names are to be listed based on prior consensus. Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 19:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
This was between C24 and I and had nothing to do with the CSI page. Who cares about CSI, I care about the false accusations and the claims of things that don't exist. IrishLass ( talk) 14:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
User:DJS24 ( talk) 11:23 16 January 2008
Changing any section while a consensus discussion is in progress is a bad faith edit. Do not change the box again until actual editors who aren't having a check user run on them comment. Your edits are disruptive and go against what has been said during the discussion. Additionally, trolling for people to help you with the discussion is against the rules. KellyAna ( talk) 04:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm adding the following back into my talk page, as I feel its related to the discussion on the Wiki. admin notice board. I removed this information earlier today....
- I would first like to thank Mangojuice for stepping into the discussion and pointing issues that needed to be addressed. Mangojuice also calmed the issue down as it was getting out of hand. I joined Wikipedia to help contribute my knowledge of television and NASCAR to the Wikipedia sites. I was also under the impression that well knowledge people worked on these sites. I found out otherwise over the course of these past days. I have been dealing with the most disrespectful, disrupted, and uncivil users that I have ever seen on an internet site. Irishlass and KellyAna have been nothing but difficult during this entire discussion. I have pointed out all my reasoning, examples, answered questions and have supported my thought process. You will see all that if you read my comments on the Las Vegas TV site. None of that was being shown at first because KellyAna and Irishlass were deleting my comments. I had to request an admin. to come in and review the situation, as you will see Mangojuices's comments and solutions regarding this issue. I'm not going to sit here and address what the actions of KellyAna and Irishlass were, as CarsGm5's comments obtain that issue. Of course right when we we're making progress with this dispute, KellyAna accused CarsGm5 and myself of being the same person, as a last resort to keep her solution standing. I hope someone looks into this matter as when they do, they will find NO connections between Cars and myself. After that dirty play by KellyAna, I have decided to no longer contribute to the Las Vegas TV Site but instead contribute to other Wiki. sites; sites that will have rational, well knowledge editors that argue discussions that right way by showing facts, not by taking dirty actions. With that said, I hope this discussion regarding the infobox stays open and other editors/admins contribute to the discussion, as my comments are noted and shown to help move the process alone. I will also make sure my comments stay posted, as hours of debating with troublemakers, shouldn't be removed. I will also make sure this message stays up under a different heading, as I want the reason I'm no longer contributing to that page shown to the admins looking into the issue. Once again, thank you Mangojuice/CasGm5 for stepping in and taking control of the issue. I hope to see you on other Wiki. sites. DJS --
DJS24 (
talk) 09:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Just wanted to let you know that copyrighted images (like
Image:HendrickMSLogo.gif and
Image:Brothers & Sisters title card.jpg) cannot be used in userpages, you have to remove them. By the way, sorry for not helping you out with the whole Las Vegas thing, i just really really hate discussing with editors that don't want to discuss, so i usually try to avoid that kind of drama. Anyway, welcome, keep on editing and i assure you there are a lot of nice people here.--
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 20:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- ::I'll get rid of them, thanks for telling me. Yeah, I'm just tired of dealing with those two on that site. --
DJS24 (
talk) 20:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- :::Just walk away, there's no need to get stressed out about it. :) --
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 20:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- ::::I need to agree, there are several users that act 10x better than those two. Keep editing, and don't let them get to you. They are just low class people trying to cause problems. CARS! --
CarsGm5 (
talk) 02:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Hope it helps -- DJS24 ( talk) 06:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:2235153860.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxred93 | talk count bot 02:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't worry about it; FCY is a good admin and surely won't block you based on "spite" due to a discussion he's been pointed to without at least looking at the discussion. I'll add a link to the archived discussion for his convenience. Mango juice talk 14:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Copyrighted non-free images such as product logos and promotional materials may not be used outside of the article namespace. You may link to these images by including a colon before the image name, as in [[:image:image.jpg]], doing this will prevent the image from being rendered. For more information on non-free content and why it can't be used on WikiProject pages, please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria exemptions and the more general WP:NFCC guidelines.
When using photographs of consoles or console accessories, bear in mind that you can only use free licensed imagery. Replaceable images from press kits are not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. Luckily, there's a treasure trove of free images you may use from the Wikimedia Commons. These are located at commons:Category:Xbox 360 and commons:Category:Xbox.
Since the images used in the 360 wikiproject violate Wikipedia policies, I have removed them or replaced them with free alternatives where available. I've also removed the Microsoft logos from the relevant userbox. If these were duplicate or orphaned images, I will delete them. You are welcome to create copyright-free replacements for any deleted image, provided that they are not derivative works or trademark infringements. Please let me know if you have any further questions or if you need help with procuring free images. Regards, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 04:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:2950582604.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 22:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I asked Blackwatch21 about building the Xbox 360 portal and he said it was ok. Just wanted to make sure you knew what I'm doing; I'm not trying to take over your invention. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 05:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I think that admin was doing what had to be done when he removed those images from the page. I can't remember for sure, but I think that only free images are allowed on non-encyclopediac pages. ( fair use policy) I added existing images for the consoles, and I'm not sure that the "Made by Xbox" logo violates free-use, so I put that back as well. I'm not going to remove that pic or the "Tom Clancy's EndWar" pic on the portal, but don't be too surprised if someone else removes them again. (I can't remember if non-free images are allowed on portals.) Anyway, I asked the admin to be a little more prudent in the future when removing images, so hopefully if images get removed again, it won't wreck the whole page. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 17:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm removing references for past episodes of Las Vegas. I'd like to know why the one from last night still needs a reference when there aren't any on the episodes for Seasons 1-4 or past episodes from this season? The only references on Season 5 aren't for the airdates or proof of the title, instead refereing to NBC's green event. Anyone care to explain that? Robinepowell ( talk) 22:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
To reiterate: you may not use non-free images outside of article space. Use of X360 logos in userboxes and the WikiProject is in violation of policy. Please stop. I have nothing against your project, but I regularly monitor Wikipedia uploads for potential copyright violations. I understand that your attempts to illustrate the project page were made in good faith, but if you are going to be dealing with non-free images, you need to familiarize yourself with the WP:NFCC. Thanks, ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 23:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I'll ask you, as I see your the creator of the Wikiproject Xbox. Is there anything you want me to do on the page? I have have a lot of free time to contribute to the page. Thought I ask, I don't want to ruin anything on your project. Noah!-- Noah Baurer ( talk) 19:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
As far as I know, I removed it from all the pages that is shouldn't have been on. If you want to doublecheck to make sure, this page lists all the pages on wikipedia that link to {{ xboxp}}. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 03:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I saw the "rumor" at Las Vegas but didn't remove it because it was hidden. It's cool that you did, I have no problem with that. I'm just avoiding LV because the user that reverted to his edit 6 times is now actively accusing me of being a sock puppet and totally ignoring yours and Tj21's reverts to LV. And...have you heard they might just cancel Las Vegas after this season? IrishLass ( talk) 20:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm stopping by your talk page to state that I answered your source question, which you originally addressed to KellyAna. It's there on her talk page, of course. I'll see you around. Flyer22 ( talk) 05:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
What is with Bleek25 having to have the article "his" way? He keeps adding stuff just because it's been reverted by you or me. What is up with that? Anyway, I'm bordering on 3RR, can't do more today. If you see him revert again, can you take care of it? KellyAna ( talk) 23:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
You are doing an amazing job wit Wikiproject Xbox. Its grown to 19, and if we keep this up, who know what we can accomplish! Anyway, expect more logins by me in the future. 1yodsyo1 Talk! 21:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello DJ. I came to see if you are still interested in working on this project. Me, Joelster, Inkquill and Gprince007 are hard at work here and could use some help. Two questions: Do you still want to do it and why? Respond to me as soon as you can. Johnnyauau2000 ( talk) 12:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to talk you about this as I don't think it belongs in the Template namespace. Couldn't it just be moved to a subpage of your userpage and subst'd from there? xenocidic ( talk) 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Ending run date for characters is still the year the show stops production. Even though it is in syndication, 2008 is the end date for the characters. "Present" refers only to filming, not shown on air. Thanks for understanding. IrishLass ( talk)
Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.
Melon‑ Bot ( STOP!) 22:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't be the right person to apologize to. :) However, if you'd like, it would be a mark of maturity if you would review your past comments and delete anything which you think was uncivil or an attack. As for KellyAna's comments to you, I don't review every single thing she says, so if you see her saying something that is uncivil, the best way to deal with it is to point it out, either on the page where she says it, or to post on her talkpage with a diff of what she said. Or look at it this way. If you said something to someone else (I'll call him Joe, just to have a name), and Joe thought you were rude, how would you want him to deal with it? To be rude back at you, or to go to an admin and demand they did something to you? Or would you want Joe to just come to you and tell you that he had a problem, and give you a pointer to the exact thing you said, so that you'd have an opportunity to review it and try to work things out with him? I think most people would want that last option. -- El on ka 01:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello there, I see you are on the 24 WikiProject. It's been quite dead for some time now, and me personally, I intend to revive it. I considered maybe even a 24 Portal, i see the project founder hasn't been on Wikipedia for nearly a year. What are your thoughts on the project? Are you still interested in it? And would you help revive it? Let me know, I would intend to help out a lot, maybe "take over" the founders position, well not take over, but possibly help lead the project? Was just a thought and I wanted your input. My talk page would be the best place. Cheers, Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 19:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Note, the above message is what Steve Crossin asked me to say to you.
The
Helpful
One
(Review) 18:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Also a note, I've created a portal. But we should focus on the project first, I think. Just wondering, was it you who redesigned the page? Not bad. :) Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 01:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a lot of ideas, I kinda do things without asking. I hope you don't mind. Thanks DJS -- DJS24 ( talk) 01:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Sure, I don't mind. Just don't do any page blanking, OK? :P But, there are a few things I'd like to change with the project, it's all to improve the article quality, there's a list in "Goals". Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 01:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Holly.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Based on your instuctions, I made your signature.
1. Go to peferences
2. Enter this into signature bar: '''<b><font color="black">[[User:DJS24|DJS]]</font></b><b><font color="navy">[[User talk:DJS24|24]]</font></b> '''
3. Save
BW21. --
Black
Watch
21 02:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Here. Flyer22 ( talk) 20:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Did they give a main reason for deleting the logo? I couldn't find the link to the deletion report. NOAH! -- Noah Baurer ( talk) 21:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I found something that might be useful to our logo dispute. [6]. BW21. -- Black Watch 21 00:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry about that little thing yesterday. I've been kind of stressed out in RL and the image being deleted and that admin requesting that the lists of funny vandalisms be deleted kind of put me over the top and I overreacted. I am now back and I'm sorry about that. I will try to make a new logo that looks similar to the old one but is not copyrightable. It won't be quite as good, but it's better than nothing. I'll probably have it up sometime this weekend, but I'm not sure exactly when because I do have some stuff going on in RL. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 23:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC) P.S. I'm also posting this on Blackwatch and xenocidic's talk pages. P.P.S Just wanted to say that the admin on Commons was correct in deleting the image. It did count as a derivative work. I just wasn't sure where the line was drawn and apparently I guessed wrong.
Can you please review this RFC and make comment. There is a campaign to harass me from editing, and I believe my edits are being mis-represented. If you have a moment, can you please have a look.
Thank-you. Wageslave ( talk) 23:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow! Thanks a lot! I have to admit I never expected to get that barnstar.... I really appreciate it. Regards. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 01:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 01:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Image workshop. Bottom of the page.-- Black Watch 21 17:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:DTTR. I accept we may disagree on the edit but issuing me with a vandalism warning is at least violating WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. If you have a problem with an edit then I am always open to reasonable discussion. If you are interested in resolving this issue amicably (as I know I am) then handing out warnings over good faith and perfectly reasonable edits, is not that way to go about things. ( Emperor ( talk) 20:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC))
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. That template is not needed or required. Showing that template, shows your looking for help or trolling for users to support your concensus. Please see WP:Troll Brian Boru is awesome ( talk) 21:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Over and out, big guy. lol. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 05:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, DJS24. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#New process page?. Thank you. – xeno ( talk) 16:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Shut up Dan, oh by the way definite movie to see. BW21.-- Black Watch 21 20:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
It's just you. But besides that I, of course, looked at the discussion before deleting. This was a hard decision but in the end I was more convinced of User:Suntag's comments than the others. Closing a discussion is not about counting votes and I have no reason to care about the fact that Suntag's account is no more then a few months old. Also, of course it had an open discussion, so I went to work at PUI, closed the discussion as delete and accordingly deleted the image. Where exactly, besides the fact you don't agree with the result, is that against policy? That is how every discussion gets closed on Wikipedia. Where exactly was the discussion that a Commons administrator has no problem with the image? I did do some homework before deleting and saw this debate at Commons, I assume about the same image. That discussion also closed as delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Bummer if you got your feelings hurt, but frankly, listing Banfield as Mr. Banfield when you know he's got a first name (and I question that you did despite your assertion to the contrary) is just silly. Characters' names are always listed first-and-last. If you don't know them both, leave it for someone who does. I've also reverted your petty revision of my editing (get your own back, did you?) since you took a grammatically correct sentence with Wyle's name as a subordinate clause and changed it to a grammatically incorrect one. I'd suggest, again, that you check what you're doing before editing, but I don't want any more fuss over this. Drmargi ( talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
User:Phonelabel vandalised Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Klaksonn (2nd nomination)... not sure if I should revert. Mild vandalism, admittedly - he changed my name to a boy's name and added something in the Conclusion section -, but sort of idiotic to vandalise a sockpuppet case page about your User handle... He now also listed his handle as "retired", though that remains to be seen. the Ogress smash! 19:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)