This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
|
NOte: AN/I involving
Nineteen Nightmares===
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
NOTE: The text below was copied verbatim from Nineteen Nightmare's talk page and placed here by Austex, It was NOT placed here by Sarah, author of the block. It is placed here as a reference only as an indicator of the end of the 19N issue.
03:47, 12 July 2010 Sarah (talk | contribs) 12 July 2010 Sarah (talk | contribs) blocked
Nineteen Nightmares (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Disruptive editing) |
---|
Copied from Austin, Texas Discussion Page:
Austex • Talk 20:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to comment on how impressed I am with your professionalism regarding your possible conflict of interest. Thank you, and as another editor said at Talk:Austin, Texas, it's great to have an expert around. I'll be sure to check out your book next time I walk into a local bookstore; I'm a postcard person myself. Cheers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 03:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the courtesy notification about your changes. I have no problems with anything you've mentioned, or changes made. My initial intention was to get some history in the county, and the timeline was probably overkill. My interests have moved to areas not related to county histories. However, thought I would mention that I like what you have done on the Williamson County talk page. If only there were somebody for every county in Texas to solicit input. Good luck. And, again, thanks for the courtesy. Maile66 ( talk) 21:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
You probably already had this information, but below are some links I used as reference points on Williamson County.
Maile66 (
talk) 23:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cowan Creek Amenity Center.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Eeekster ( talk) 23:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The following notice has been posted July 23, 2010 on the talk page for Round Rock, Texas The item is located HERE(Third section down).. For some reason the Round Rock Discussion page has no index) Austex • Talk 17:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Request edit}}
As a former partner in "La Frontera" I have a
WP:COI conflict of interest re adding the "La Frontera" name to this movie paragraph below. If any editor(s)are so inclined, and think it is relevant to the article, they may add the name on the article page roughly in the position shown below. Most articles re the movie list this location, and there are event tours to the site using the development name. If you wisdh to do so please add it in normal black text, of course, rather than copying this paragraph:
Hi Austex, sorry it took so long to get back to you. Don't worry about being "not very good at this yet." Wikipedia is a learning process because there is so many different policies and guidelines, it can take a long time to get the hang of everything. I've been editing for over two years, and still learn something new everyday. There are lots of good editors here who are always prepared to help, it doesn't matter how many questions or advice I seek from them, they always get back to me. Most of my edits are just touching up articles to comply with wikipedia policy, like the edit that mentioned in your note. As per your request for help, anything I can do for you, don't be afraid to ask.
One thing about your edits in this article that I wanted to mention is the external links. I see where you added a large number to the article, but you should probably read the policy on external links ( WP:EL). Wikipedia isn't a directory of links for every site a user can find that has something to do with the subject. There are certain sites to include, but many that shouldn't be included. Also, external links are supposed to go in an "External links" section, not the text of the article. There are also times when including a reference is more appropiate than an external link, which is something reading the policy will give you a better understanding of. And by the way, good work on the articles. Cmr08 ( talk) 21:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
When I said you added external links, I wasn't refering to the links that are in the "External links" section, I was refering to the external links in the text of the article. According to the article history, it was you who added a large number of links in the "Sites of interest" section a couple of days ago. Just because it's not titled "External links" doesn't change the fact that there external links. Is it posible that you are confusing references and external links, because the links you added to that section were not references, they were external links, which shouldn't be added to the text to begin with. I hope I'm not confusing you here, but references and external links are not the same. You should probably read up on references in the help section, it might be easier to understand because when reading this back, I'm even confusing myself. Cmr08 ( talk) 23:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
One other thing I just noticed. Adding sections and leaving messages that the info is to be provided is not really the best way to edit an article. Even though your intent is to come back and do the work, it still doesn't look good in the article to leave comments in the text. I'm not sure exactly how to do this, but it's proably very easy, is to create a subpage on your user page for work in progress, and then when you finish it, you can move the new section into the article. Just go to the Editing Wikipedia section on the help page, then goto creating pages. It will explain how to create a subpage there. Cmr08 ( talk) 00:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Austex, I just cleaned up the external links in this aricle. As you know now, external links are not listed in the text of the article, they go in an "External links" section. Several of the external links you added to the "Sites of interest" section are already included in the correct section at the bottom of the article. Also, wikipedia policy is not to include a number of external links to the same website, as wikipedia is not a directory of links. Instead of adding links to multiple pages of the visit Georgetown site, it is more appropiate to just include a link to the homepage of the site, which is already inlcuded in the "External links" section. Cmr08 ( talk) 16:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I think you should go back and re-read the actual policy that you're citing to me here. You're just misunderstanding what the policy is talking about. When it mentiones adding them to the article, it's not talking about the text, it's refering to an "External links" section. I also have no idea how you copied the policy word-for-word because the words "(within the article)" are not part of the actual text at WP:EL, so I have no idea how they ended up in this message you left for me. The main idea of the policy is that external links shouldn't be added to the text. Cmr08 ( talk) 01:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree, it's a learning experience indeed. I've been editing for over two years and still learn something new everday. The policies can be so confusing at times, that I often have to reach out to more experienced editors for advice. As for deleting discussions from talk pages, I believe that archiving is the preferred process, but also that editors can remove discussion from their talk page if they want to. Since it's your talk page, do whatever you feel is best. Cmr08 ( talk) 06:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been reading up on this quite a bit and now have a much better understanding:
The term "Reference" means the format in which you make or document the citation. In-line footnote referencing is by far the most common method of cititing sources on Wikipedia. Once made, the referenced citation shows up in the Reference list at the bottom of the page in a numbered list under the {{reflist}} section.
Both WP:CIT and WP:REF go into far greater detail as to the format of referneces. They can range from simple to complex but ideally one should remain consistent in their use. (Parenthetically - That's why I have a list of citations on my User page so I can copy and fill in the blanks each time in a consistent manner).
There is also a Wikipedia citation generator HERE where you fill in the blanks and it will produce perfect citations.
When and Why to cite sources: (abbreviated from WP:CIT
I hope this information is of help to all of us in having a better understanding of External Links (generally discouraged) versus Citations/Reference (which are strongly encouraged).
Austex •
Talk 22:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Austex, I have removed two fair use images from your user page. Fair use images cannot be used outside of the article space. The other images on your user page that are under free licenses are, of course, fine. Thanks. -- Deskana (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:USER#Images. But you should bear in mind that there is not always a relevant policy description for everything, as policies are not prescriptive, they're descriptive; policies describe our practices. -- Deskana (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: I have removed the image again as it is fair use. Once again, please do not put fair use images on your user page. -- Deskana (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:McConico.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 02:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
section in question is
HERE:
I'll take a look at this when I get a chance, probably later tonight. By the way, WP:ELNO is just a subsection of WP:EL. It's all part of the policy on external links. I just used that link so you wouldn't have to scan the whole policy to find it. Cmr08 ( talk) 01:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Austin book cover scan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Austex, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Austex. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
A REQUEST EDIT item was posted HERE Re: Because of a relationship relating to La Frontera I have a WP:COI conflict of interest re adding the "La Frontera" name to this movie paragraph below. If any editor(s)are so inclined, and think it [1]is relevant to the article, they may add the name on the article page roughly in the position shown below. Most articles re the movie list this location, and there are event tours to the site using the development name. If you wisdh to do so please add it in normal black text, of course, rather than copying this paragraph: Austex • Talk 18:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Partly done: I'm adding a select part of the change now. Thank you for your contribution. -- ANowlin: talk 22:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
For example the Round Rock, Texas page I am working on, all the captions are centered. I want to left-justify instead. What do I need to code to make that happen? Thanks mucho, from Texas
Austex •
Talk 19:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Re. Talk:Round_Rock,_Texas#Conflict_of_Interest_re_Adding_Language
Please note, I am taking a break from Wikipedia. However, I thought it only fair to answer your question.
I did not complete the original request based upon the core policy of verifiability - that is, the reader of the article should be able to check the facts, by looking at appropriate reliable sources.
Particularly important to note, in this case, is the policy on synthesis and original research.
If a newspaper published the specific facts, then I encourage you to supply it as a reference and add another {{Request edit}} on the talk page, so that hopefully another editor can process it.
I wish you the very best of luck, Chzz ► 18:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Austex, I think you may have forgot to include the url with the references you added to the Austin Toros article. Since you have a retrieval date listed, I just figured you clicked save without noticing this. Cmr08 ( talk) 05:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Austex, I'm not much help answering the question you asked on my talk page in regards to the Round Rock article. I have no clue about submiting article or peer review, in fact, I didn't even know these things existed. Your best bet is to ask a help me question on your talk page, or even better would be to approach an experienced editor by way of their talk page. I wish I could be more helpful.
As for the Round Rock article, I must say you've done a great job. I'm glad I was able to help out. Looking forward to your next project, and willing to help out again. By the way, thanks for the barnstar, I've never recieved one of them before. Enjoy your vacation, lol. Cmr08 ( talk) 04:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
My congratulations and admiration too. The article looks great. I'm sorry I was not able to be of much help. Things are busy around here and I had the best of intentions. Maybe we'll meet on some other central Texas article.
Iluvrr (
talk) 14:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I am going to copy over to here your contributions to this page:
Iluvrr (
talk) 14:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Changes made:
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I and others have worked tirelessly to upgrade the Round Rock, Texas article. 14 new sections have been added in depth with good citations and well researched facts. It has been fact checked by the Director of the Round Rock Library as an added step. And I personally made 264 edits over the last month alone (see aheader above this one). Question is - how does one apply for a review to upgrade the quality rating? It currently rates a "Start" rating. But the article is now three to four times longer than is was originally. There has been a lot of cross-checking, so I think it is ready for a review. Thanks. Appreciate any advice. Austex • Talk 22:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
You forgot to add a copyright tag to File:Georgetown San Gabrial Village.jpg that you uploaded recently. Cheers ww2censor ( talk) 04:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Georgetown San Gabrial Village.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
|
NOte: AN/I involving
Nineteen Nightmares===
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
NOTE: The text below was copied verbatim from Nineteen Nightmare's talk page and placed here by Austex, It was NOT placed here by Sarah, author of the block. It is placed here as a reference only as an indicator of the end of the 19N issue.
03:47, 12 July 2010 Sarah (talk | contribs) 12 July 2010 Sarah (talk | contribs) blocked
Nineteen Nightmares (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Disruptive editing) |
---|
Copied from Austin, Texas Discussion Page:
Austex • Talk 20:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to comment on how impressed I am with your professionalism regarding your possible conflict of interest. Thank you, and as another editor said at Talk:Austin, Texas, it's great to have an expert around. I'll be sure to check out your book next time I walk into a local bookstore; I'm a postcard person myself. Cheers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 03:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the courtesy notification about your changes. I have no problems with anything you've mentioned, or changes made. My initial intention was to get some history in the county, and the timeline was probably overkill. My interests have moved to areas not related to county histories. However, thought I would mention that I like what you have done on the Williamson County talk page. If only there were somebody for every county in Texas to solicit input. Good luck. And, again, thanks for the courtesy. Maile66 ( talk) 21:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
You probably already had this information, but below are some links I used as reference points on Williamson County.
Maile66 (
talk) 23:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cowan Creek Amenity Center.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Eeekster ( talk) 23:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The following notice has been posted July 23, 2010 on the talk page for Round Rock, Texas The item is located HERE(Third section down).. For some reason the Round Rock Discussion page has no index) Austex • Talk 17:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Request edit}}
As a former partner in "La Frontera" I have a
WP:COI conflict of interest re adding the "La Frontera" name to this movie paragraph below. If any editor(s)are so inclined, and think it is relevant to the article, they may add the name on the article page roughly in the position shown below. Most articles re the movie list this location, and there are event tours to the site using the development name. If you wisdh to do so please add it in normal black text, of course, rather than copying this paragraph:
Hi Austex, sorry it took so long to get back to you. Don't worry about being "not very good at this yet." Wikipedia is a learning process because there is so many different policies and guidelines, it can take a long time to get the hang of everything. I've been editing for over two years, and still learn something new everyday. There are lots of good editors here who are always prepared to help, it doesn't matter how many questions or advice I seek from them, they always get back to me. Most of my edits are just touching up articles to comply with wikipedia policy, like the edit that mentioned in your note. As per your request for help, anything I can do for you, don't be afraid to ask.
One thing about your edits in this article that I wanted to mention is the external links. I see where you added a large number to the article, but you should probably read the policy on external links ( WP:EL). Wikipedia isn't a directory of links for every site a user can find that has something to do with the subject. There are certain sites to include, but many that shouldn't be included. Also, external links are supposed to go in an "External links" section, not the text of the article. There are also times when including a reference is more appropiate than an external link, which is something reading the policy will give you a better understanding of. And by the way, good work on the articles. Cmr08 ( talk) 21:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
When I said you added external links, I wasn't refering to the links that are in the "External links" section, I was refering to the external links in the text of the article. According to the article history, it was you who added a large number of links in the "Sites of interest" section a couple of days ago. Just because it's not titled "External links" doesn't change the fact that there external links. Is it posible that you are confusing references and external links, because the links you added to that section were not references, they were external links, which shouldn't be added to the text to begin with. I hope I'm not confusing you here, but references and external links are not the same. You should probably read up on references in the help section, it might be easier to understand because when reading this back, I'm even confusing myself. Cmr08 ( talk) 23:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
One other thing I just noticed. Adding sections and leaving messages that the info is to be provided is not really the best way to edit an article. Even though your intent is to come back and do the work, it still doesn't look good in the article to leave comments in the text. I'm not sure exactly how to do this, but it's proably very easy, is to create a subpage on your user page for work in progress, and then when you finish it, you can move the new section into the article. Just go to the Editing Wikipedia section on the help page, then goto creating pages. It will explain how to create a subpage there. Cmr08 ( talk) 00:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Austex, I just cleaned up the external links in this aricle. As you know now, external links are not listed in the text of the article, they go in an "External links" section. Several of the external links you added to the "Sites of interest" section are already included in the correct section at the bottom of the article. Also, wikipedia policy is not to include a number of external links to the same website, as wikipedia is not a directory of links. Instead of adding links to multiple pages of the visit Georgetown site, it is more appropiate to just include a link to the homepage of the site, which is already inlcuded in the "External links" section. Cmr08 ( talk) 16:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I think you should go back and re-read the actual policy that you're citing to me here. You're just misunderstanding what the policy is talking about. When it mentiones adding them to the article, it's not talking about the text, it's refering to an "External links" section. I also have no idea how you copied the policy word-for-word because the words "(within the article)" are not part of the actual text at WP:EL, so I have no idea how they ended up in this message you left for me. The main idea of the policy is that external links shouldn't be added to the text. Cmr08 ( talk) 01:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree, it's a learning experience indeed. I've been editing for over two years and still learn something new everday. The policies can be so confusing at times, that I often have to reach out to more experienced editors for advice. As for deleting discussions from talk pages, I believe that archiving is the preferred process, but also that editors can remove discussion from their talk page if they want to. Since it's your talk page, do whatever you feel is best. Cmr08 ( talk) 06:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been reading up on this quite a bit and now have a much better understanding:
The term "Reference" means the format in which you make or document the citation. In-line footnote referencing is by far the most common method of cititing sources on Wikipedia. Once made, the referenced citation shows up in the Reference list at the bottom of the page in a numbered list under the {{reflist}} section.
Both WP:CIT and WP:REF go into far greater detail as to the format of referneces. They can range from simple to complex but ideally one should remain consistent in their use. (Parenthetically - That's why I have a list of citations on my User page so I can copy and fill in the blanks each time in a consistent manner).
There is also a Wikipedia citation generator HERE where you fill in the blanks and it will produce perfect citations.
When and Why to cite sources: (abbreviated from WP:CIT
I hope this information is of help to all of us in having a better understanding of External Links (generally discouraged) versus Citations/Reference (which are strongly encouraged).
Austex •
Talk 22:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Austex, I have removed two fair use images from your user page. Fair use images cannot be used outside of the article space. The other images on your user page that are under free licenses are, of course, fine. Thanks. -- Deskana (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:USER#Images. But you should bear in mind that there is not always a relevant policy description for everything, as policies are not prescriptive, they're descriptive; policies describe our practices. -- Deskana (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: I have removed the image again as it is fair use. Once again, please do not put fair use images on your user page. -- Deskana (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:McConico.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 02:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
section in question is
HERE:
I'll take a look at this when I get a chance, probably later tonight. By the way, WP:ELNO is just a subsection of WP:EL. It's all part of the policy on external links. I just used that link so you wouldn't have to scan the whole policy to find it. Cmr08 ( talk) 01:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Austin book cover scan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Austex, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Austex. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
A REQUEST EDIT item was posted HERE Re: Because of a relationship relating to La Frontera I have a WP:COI conflict of interest re adding the "La Frontera" name to this movie paragraph below. If any editor(s)are so inclined, and think it [1]is relevant to the article, they may add the name on the article page roughly in the position shown below. Most articles re the movie list this location, and there are event tours to the site using the development name. If you wisdh to do so please add it in normal black text, of course, rather than copying this paragraph: Austex • Talk 18:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Partly done: I'm adding a select part of the change now. Thank you for your contribution. -- ANowlin: talk 22:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
For example the Round Rock, Texas page I am working on, all the captions are centered. I want to left-justify instead. What do I need to code to make that happen? Thanks mucho, from Texas
Austex •
Talk 19:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Re. Talk:Round_Rock,_Texas#Conflict_of_Interest_re_Adding_Language
Please note, I am taking a break from Wikipedia. However, I thought it only fair to answer your question.
I did not complete the original request based upon the core policy of verifiability - that is, the reader of the article should be able to check the facts, by looking at appropriate reliable sources.
Particularly important to note, in this case, is the policy on synthesis and original research.
If a newspaper published the specific facts, then I encourage you to supply it as a reference and add another {{Request edit}} on the talk page, so that hopefully another editor can process it.
I wish you the very best of luck, Chzz ► 18:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Austex, I think you may have forgot to include the url with the references you added to the Austin Toros article. Since you have a retrieval date listed, I just figured you clicked save without noticing this. Cmr08 ( talk) 05:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Austex, I'm not much help answering the question you asked on my talk page in regards to the Round Rock article. I have no clue about submiting article or peer review, in fact, I didn't even know these things existed. Your best bet is to ask a help me question on your talk page, or even better would be to approach an experienced editor by way of their talk page. I wish I could be more helpful.
As for the Round Rock article, I must say you've done a great job. I'm glad I was able to help out. Looking forward to your next project, and willing to help out again. By the way, thanks for the barnstar, I've never recieved one of them before. Enjoy your vacation, lol. Cmr08 ( talk) 04:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
My congratulations and admiration too. The article looks great. I'm sorry I was not able to be of much help. Things are busy around here and I had the best of intentions. Maybe we'll meet on some other central Texas article.
Iluvrr (
talk) 14:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I am going to copy over to here your contributions to this page:
Iluvrr (
talk) 14:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Changes made:
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I and others have worked tirelessly to upgrade the Round Rock, Texas article. 14 new sections have been added in depth with good citations and well researched facts. It has been fact checked by the Director of the Round Rock Library as an added step. And I personally made 264 edits over the last month alone (see aheader above this one). Question is - how does one apply for a review to upgrade the quality rating? It currently rates a "Start" rating. But the article is now three to four times longer than is was originally. There has been a lot of cross-checking, so I think it is ready for a review. Thanks. Appreciate any advice. Austex • Talk 22:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
You forgot to add a copyright tag to File:Georgetown San Gabrial Village.jpg that you uploaded recently. Cheers ww2censor ( talk) 04:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Georgetown San Gabrial Village.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |