Law Template‑class | |||||||
|
United States Template‑class | |||||||
|
This is a very useful template, and a helpful navigational tool! :) — Cirt ( talk) 04:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
It has been contended at Template talk:Criminal due process that such templates may not contain redlinks. This may be of interest to those who maintain this template (which currently does contain a few red links, mostly in the same section). Savidan 00:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt ( talk) 23:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
This template should be limited to cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. — Cirt ( talk) 16:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I have added |staten= {{{staten|collapsed}}}
parameters for all the child navboxes (Establishment, Free Exercise, etc...), which allows multiple child navboxes to be uncollapsed by adding |staten=uncollapsed
where n is the number of the child menu (Establishment=1, Free Exercise=2, etc.). (Note: I accidentally pressed enter instead of a quotation mark while typing the changes made, which is why the edit summary is just "add".) This was based on the discussion I found at
Template talk:Navbox with collapsible groups#Expand more than one section.
The reason for doing so was so that both the Free Exercise and Free Speech child navboxes could be uncollapsed on the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission article, since that case deals with both areas. In that case, this is the text for the navbox's usage:
{{US1stAmendment|state=collapsed|state2=uncollapsed|state3=uncollapsed}}
The navbox is initially displayed as collapsed, but when "show" is clicked, the Free Exercise and Free Speech sections are displayed. Here is what that produces:
Hope this helps anyone else facing the same issue. AHeneen ( talk) 05:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Smith v. California (1959) to the "Obscenity" subcategory in Freedom of Speech, and possibly create a similar "Obscenity" subcategory in Freedom of the Press for this case there. 184.3.211.90 ( talk) 00:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar" to "Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar" to prevent redirect
We currently have five categories in the template's Establishment Clause section: public funding, public displays, school prayer, creationism, legislature prayer, and other. How do people feel about redoing these categories to match those provided either by Justice Alito or Justice Kavanaugh in the recent American Legion case? The categories could be something like:
Dwsrmwolf ( talk) 15:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Is this covered? I think it should be, under its own header, but I'm not seeing anything. English-only laws, bans on speaking foreign languages in public (e.g. after WWI), English-only Indian boarding schools with the goal of cultural genocide [excuse me] assimilation, etc. Some people think it was illegal for a time to speak Native American languages, but I can't find anything about that (apart from the boarding schools). Anyway, a header for this topic would be interesting. —
kwami (
talk) 01:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Law Template‑class | |||||||
|
United States Template‑class | |||||||
|
This is a very useful template, and a helpful navigational tool! :) — Cirt ( talk) 04:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
It has been contended at Template talk:Criminal due process that such templates may not contain redlinks. This may be of interest to those who maintain this template (which currently does contain a few red links, mostly in the same section). Savidan 00:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt ( talk) 23:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
This template should be limited to cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. — Cirt ( talk) 16:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I have added |staten= {{{staten|collapsed}}}
parameters for all the child navboxes (Establishment, Free Exercise, etc...), which allows multiple child navboxes to be uncollapsed by adding |staten=uncollapsed
where n is the number of the child menu (Establishment=1, Free Exercise=2, etc.). (Note: I accidentally pressed enter instead of a quotation mark while typing the changes made, which is why the edit summary is just "add".) This was based on the discussion I found at
Template talk:Navbox with collapsible groups#Expand more than one section.
The reason for doing so was so that both the Free Exercise and Free Speech child navboxes could be uncollapsed on the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission article, since that case deals with both areas. In that case, this is the text for the navbox's usage:
{{US1stAmendment|state=collapsed|state2=uncollapsed|state3=uncollapsed}}
The navbox is initially displayed as collapsed, but when "show" is clicked, the Free Exercise and Free Speech sections are displayed. Here is what that produces:
Hope this helps anyone else facing the same issue. AHeneen ( talk) 05:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Smith v. California (1959) to the "Obscenity" subcategory in Freedom of Speech, and possibly create a similar "Obscenity" subcategory in Freedom of the Press for this case there. 184.3.211.90 ( talk) 00:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar" to "Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar" to prevent redirect
We currently have five categories in the template's Establishment Clause section: public funding, public displays, school prayer, creationism, legislature prayer, and other. How do people feel about redoing these categories to match those provided either by Justice Alito or Justice Kavanaugh in the recent American Legion case? The categories could be something like:
Dwsrmwolf ( talk) 15:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Is this covered? I think it should be, under its own header, but I'm not seeing anything. English-only laws, bans on speaking foreign languages in public (e.g. after WWI), English-only Indian boarding schools with the goal of cultural genocide [excuse me] assimilation, etc. Some people think it was illegal for a time to speak Native American languages, but I can't find anything about that (apart from the boarding schools). Anyway, a header for this topic would be interesting. —
kwami (
talk) 01:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)