From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article needs additional citations for
verification. Please help
improve this article by
adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2013) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
1973 United States Supreme Court case
| Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 19, 1972 Decided June 21, 1973 | |
| Full case name | Paris Adult Theatre I et al., Petitioners, v. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, et al. |
| Citations | 413
U.S.
49 (
more) 93 S. Ct. 2628; 37
L. Ed. 2d 446 |
| Holding | |
| A civil injunction barring the theatres in question from showing adult films was upheld; however, the State's definitions of obscene material must be re-evaluated in light of recent jurisprudence. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Burger, joined by White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist |
| Dissent | Douglas |
| Dissent | Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall |
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a state court's injunction against the showing of obscene films in a movie theatre restricted to consenting adults. [1] The Court distinguished the case from Stanley v. Georgia, [2] saying that the privacy of the home that was controlling in Stanley was not present in the commercial exhibition of obscene movies in a theatre.
See also
References
External links
- Text of Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article needs additional citations for
verification. Please help
improve this article by
adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2013) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
1973 United States Supreme Court case
| Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argued October 19, 1972 Decided June 21, 1973 | |
| Full case name | Paris Adult Theatre I et al., Petitioners, v. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, et al. |
| Citations | 413
U.S.
49 (
more) 93 S. Ct. 2628; 37
L. Ed. 2d 446 |
| Holding | |
| A civil injunction barring the theatres in question from showing adult films was upheld; however, the State's definitions of obscene material must be re-evaluated in light of recent jurisprudence. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Burger, joined by White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist |
| Dissent | Douglas |
| Dissent | Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall |
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a state court's injunction against the showing of obscene films in a movie theatre restricted to consenting adults. [1] The Court distinguished the case from Stanley v. Georgia, [2] saying that the privacy of the home that was controlling in Stanley was not present in the commercial exhibition of obscene movies in a theatre.
See also
References
External links
- Text of Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist Oyez (oral argument audio)
United States First Amendment case law | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |