This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just wondering, can anyone make the template so that it differentiates the shuttles between American and Soviet/Russian ones? I don't know much about designing templates... --
Andylkl 15:21, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Technically the name "Space Shuttle" solely applies to the Space Shuttle Program (STS) of the USA. Including the Buran Project leads to the question what else may qualify as a "Space Shuttle". Changing the template to "Space Planes" may be appropiate. This would lead to admitting other craft into this template. I created a proposal template (shown on the right) that includes craft that may quallify as "Space Planes". Unfortunatly it's quite difficult to draw a line between a rocket or a space craft and a space plane. What do you think? Thehardwareman 01:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
The inclusion of Pathfinder is somewhat questionable, but it at least tolerable because it was built by NASA for test purposes. The inclusion of Explorer is completely without merit in my opinion as it was built as a replica for tourist purposes. I doubt that if there were a list of Saturn V rockets that we would list the replica in Huntsville. If we're going to include replica shuttles in this list, then we'd better start expanding it. I believe Space Center Houston has one called Adventure. Here's one in California [1]. And don't even start talking about all the stuff at JSC building 9. All this is to say that I would like to see Explorer removed from this list. Cjosefy 17:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to see this template converted to a horizontal layout, and moved to the bottom of the pages it's on. As it stands, it clutters up the pages a bit, and it's normally pushed down from the top-right of the page by an image/infobox relating to the page in hand. Any objections/comments? Mike Peel 14:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Why Enterprise (OV-101) is prior to Pathfinder (OV-098) and why Columbia (OV-102) is prior to Challenger (OV-099)? Or I missed anything? --Yuriy Lapitskiy 06:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Removed the follow from the template as they are paper projects, not flight articles. Can re-add once they develop further. — Huntster ( t @ c) 06:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
|group1 = Others |list1 = *''[[Hermes (spacecraft)]] *''[[Indian Space Shuttle Programme]]'' *''[[Project 921-3]]''
How about Pathfinder and Enterprise? I would have thought they would qualify the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.34.86 ( talk) 12:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just wondering, can anyone make the template so that it differentiates the shuttles between American and Soviet/Russian ones? I don't know much about designing templates... --
Andylkl 15:21, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Technically the name "Space Shuttle" solely applies to the Space Shuttle Program (STS) of the USA. Including the Buran Project leads to the question what else may qualify as a "Space Shuttle". Changing the template to "Space Planes" may be appropiate. This would lead to admitting other craft into this template. I created a proposal template (shown on the right) that includes craft that may quallify as "Space Planes". Unfortunatly it's quite difficult to draw a line between a rocket or a space craft and a space plane. What do you think? Thehardwareman 01:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
The inclusion of Pathfinder is somewhat questionable, but it at least tolerable because it was built by NASA for test purposes. The inclusion of Explorer is completely without merit in my opinion as it was built as a replica for tourist purposes. I doubt that if there were a list of Saturn V rockets that we would list the replica in Huntsville. If we're going to include replica shuttles in this list, then we'd better start expanding it. I believe Space Center Houston has one called Adventure. Here's one in California [1]. And don't even start talking about all the stuff at JSC building 9. All this is to say that I would like to see Explorer removed from this list. Cjosefy 17:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to see this template converted to a horizontal layout, and moved to the bottom of the pages it's on. As it stands, it clutters up the pages a bit, and it's normally pushed down from the top-right of the page by an image/infobox relating to the page in hand. Any objections/comments? Mike Peel 14:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Why Enterprise (OV-101) is prior to Pathfinder (OV-098) and why Columbia (OV-102) is prior to Challenger (OV-099)? Or I missed anything? --Yuriy Lapitskiy 06:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Removed the follow from the template as they are paper projects, not flight articles. Can re-add once they develop further. — Huntster ( t @ c) 06:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
|group1 = Others |list1 = *''[[Hermes (spacecraft)]] *''[[Indian Space Shuttle Programme]]'' *''[[Project 921-3]]''
How about Pathfinder and Enterprise? I would have thought they would qualify the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.34.86 ( talk) 12:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)