This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Social class template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Why should only the US class system be mentioned in template not about the US? It would be better separate the last part to a special template.-- 212.30.154.140 19:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone notice that the links "Social class in the United States" and "Social structure" link to the same article? Shouldn't that be fixed? -- Smokizzy ( talk) 21:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I believe this template is best used as a navigation aid to link to articles about social class topics. Including the US makes it appear that each of these US topics are equal in standing to the general social class topics and that they deserve some sort of special consideration over other countries. Every country has a set of social classes and the US does not deserve special recognition in that regard. I would much rather see a separate template attached to each of the US-specific articles such as: {{Socialclass/US}}. Barrylb ( talk) 07:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
why is "slave" under upper and middle class. Traditionally it should be working class as the bottom of this structure. Yobmod ( talk) 10:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Social class template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Why should only the US class system be mentioned in template not about the US? It would be better separate the last part to a special template.-- 212.30.154.140 19:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone notice that the links "Social class in the United States" and "Social structure" link to the same article? Shouldn't that be fixed? -- Smokizzy ( talk) 21:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I believe this template is best used as a navigation aid to link to articles about social class topics. Including the US makes it appear that each of these US topics are equal in standing to the general social class topics and that they deserve some sort of special consideration over other countries. Every country has a set of social classes and the US does not deserve special recognition in that regard. I would much rather see a separate template attached to each of the US-specific articles such as: {{Socialclass/US}}. Barrylb ( talk) 07:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
why is "slave" under upper and middle class. Traditionally it should be working class as the bottom of this structure. Yobmod ( talk) 10:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)