This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do we really want to separate denominations and movements of Protestantism into "major" and "minor" branches? It seems irrelevant for an infobox. One could argue that the Quakers and Mennonites had outsized influence in certain areas of Western culture (anti-slavery, early U.S. history) or that the Waldensians were not even protestants at all. I'd like to hear peoples' thoughts on just combining "major" and "minor" into "Branches."
The template would be more informative if the regional churches were grouped by the major communions, with one communion per reformation: the Lutheran Reformation, the Zwinglian/Calvinistic Reformation, the Radical Reformation, and the Anglican Reformation, though the last reformation might arguably be included as Calvinistic or even excluded as Catholic. An alternative approach (requiring more work) would replace the regional churches with the major communions/reformations, putting the emphasis on theology rather than geography and politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbickel ( talk • contribs)
Hazhk What makes you think that African initiated churches are not worth including among the nondenominationals or house churches? Let's stick to this classification, so we can somewhere with this template?
/info/en/?search=List_of_Christian_denominations#Protestantism
Ernio48 ( talk) 16:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Reformed Eastern Churches are not part of protestants.Many of these Churches are infact Orthodox in belief and practice. Sebin Prasad Cheriyan Marvallill ( talk) 18:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Can we keep this simple please. Pick one image, not three. This is supposed to be a navigational aid, not a gallery. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
edit: Pinging @ Dragovit – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
First, I don't think the people are important. The only person mentioned in the solas is Christ, and the cross is enough to represent that figure. Second, as was stated above by Finnusertop, this is supposed to be a navigational aid, not a gallery. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do we really want to separate denominations and movements of Protestantism into "major" and "minor" branches? It seems irrelevant for an infobox. One could argue that the Quakers and Mennonites had outsized influence in certain areas of Western culture (anti-slavery, early U.S. history) or that the Waldensians were not even protestants at all. I'd like to hear peoples' thoughts on just combining "major" and "minor" into "Branches."
The template would be more informative if the regional churches were grouped by the major communions, with one communion per reformation: the Lutheran Reformation, the Zwinglian/Calvinistic Reformation, the Radical Reformation, and the Anglican Reformation, though the last reformation might arguably be included as Calvinistic or even excluded as Catholic. An alternative approach (requiring more work) would replace the regional churches with the major communions/reformations, putting the emphasis on theology rather than geography and politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbickel ( talk • contribs)
Hazhk What makes you think that African initiated churches are not worth including among the nondenominationals or house churches? Let's stick to this classification, so we can somewhere with this template?
/info/en/?search=List_of_Christian_denominations#Protestantism
Ernio48 ( talk) 16:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Reformed Eastern Churches are not part of protestants.Many of these Churches are infact Orthodox in belief and practice. Sebin Prasad Cheriyan Marvallill ( talk) 18:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Can we keep this simple please. Pick one image, not three. This is supposed to be a navigational aid, not a gallery. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
edit: Pinging @ Dragovit – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 15:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
First, I don't think the people are important. The only person mentioned in the solas is Christ, and the cross is enough to represent that figure. Second, as was stated above by Finnusertop, this is supposed to be a navigational aid, not a gallery. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)