Bosnia and Herzegovina Template‑class | |||||||
|
I think that Brčko District have some municipalities too. Their names should be listed here. PANONIAN (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
No, read the Final Award. It's linked to in the notes in the infobox in the Republika Srpska article.-- estavisti 01:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Look at the English version of the webstie: Official Repbulika Srpska Web site states that the town name is changed to Bosanski Brod. The Serbian version no one can read because it is in Cyrillic so they can write their own stuff. But for the official outside world they have the English version where it states that the official Municipality name is changed back to Bosanski Bord.
Thank You, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Check once again: Republika Srpska Government Web site
Thanks and I am serious, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
This is a fine template; anyone else, though, feel underlining the title is unnecessary and perhaps detracts from its effect...? Regards, David Kernow (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Bosnia and Herzegovina Template‑class | |||||||
|
I think that Brčko District have some municipalities too. Their names should be listed here. PANONIAN (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
No, read the Final Award. It's linked to in the notes in the infobox in the Republika Srpska article.-- estavisti 01:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Look at the English version of the webstie: Official Repbulika Srpska Web site states that the town name is changed to Bosanski Brod. The Serbian version no one can read because it is in Cyrillic so they can write their own stuff. But for the official outside world they have the English version where it states that the official Municipality name is changed back to Bosanski Bord.
Thank You, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Check once again: Republika Srpska Government Web site
Thanks and I am serious, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
This is a fine template; anyone else, though, feel underlining the title is unnecessary and perhaps detracts from its effect...? Regards, David Kernow (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)