Inline Templates | ||||
|
I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 
(thin space). For example, [ neutrality disputed ]. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. —
mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Since this is of line-item use, maybe it should take a parameter to point to a talk page section, rather than just pointing to the whole talk page?
I know it's hard to maintain the section links, if the sections of the talk page change, but I'd think if someone was taking the time to archive a talk page, that these would either be gone, replaced by a page dispute/pov, or be archived along with it.
If my suggestion comes to fruition, here is some language for the usage section:
To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{POV-statement|talk page section name}} .
|
Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates. I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ contrib ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Any objection changing the category here to Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?-- BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Still causing linebreaks and therefor spaced boxes after template: [1]. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-19 t13:52z
Inline Templates | ||||
|
I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 
(thin space). For example, [ neutrality disputed ]. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. —
mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Since this is of line-item use, maybe it should take a parameter to point to a talk page section, rather than just pointing to the whole talk page?
I know it's hard to maintain the section links, if the sections of the talk page change, but I'd think if someone was taking the time to archive a talk page, that these would either be gone, replaced by a page dispute/pov, or be archived along with it.
If my suggestion comes to fruition, here is some language for the usage section:
To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{POV-statement|talk page section name}} .
|
Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates. I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ contrib ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Any objection changing the category here to Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?-- BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Still causing linebreaks and therefor spaced boxes after template: [1]. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-19 t13:52z