Is it necessary to have a 100 column? This seems superfluous, as there is no associated prefix. To me it seems like noise; a distraction from the contents of the table. Hadron137 ( talk) 22:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I do think it is necessary to illustrate that there is no associated prefix and also because it works as a symmetry point. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 07:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that is unnecessary, there is no less symmetry without it, it really illustrates nothing. Kbrose ( talk) 12:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- I also think it is too much noise for what it adds, which is little. Reducing the table width would also be an improvement. — Quondum 15:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Is it necessary to have a 100 column? This seems superfluous, as there is no associated prefix. To me it seems like noise; a distraction from the contents of the table. Hadron137 ( talk) 22:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I do think it is necessary to illustrate that there is no associated prefix and also because it works as a symmetry point. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 07:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that is unnecessary, there is no less symmetry without it, it really illustrates nothing. Kbrose ( talk) 12:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- I also think it is too much noise for what it adds, which is little. Reducing the table width would also be an improvement. — Quondum 15:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)