Linguistics: Etymology Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Even though I strongly disagree with the ideas proposed by the "Moscow circle" of linguists such as Starostin, I've created a navbox template for them nonetheless. — Sagotreespirit ( talk) 04:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
This appears to be a low quality aggregate of information, grouping theories with some degree of acceptance with fringe theories, and likewise serious scholars with minority opinions and fringe linguists themselves. The grouping appears somewhat arbitrary other than it's attempting to link the people and proposals for long range historical linguistics in a way which is totally agnostic to any actual veracity of those claims, and proposals like Altaic have their own equivalent template already. Warrenmck ( talk) 02:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Linguistics: Etymology Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Even though I strongly disagree with the ideas proposed by the "Moscow circle" of linguists such as Starostin, I've created a navbox template for them nonetheless. — Sagotreespirit ( talk) 04:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
This appears to be a low quality aggregate of information, grouping theories with some degree of acceptance with fringe theories, and likewise serious scholars with minority opinions and fringe linguists themselves. The grouping appears somewhat arbitrary other than it's attempting to link the people and proposals for long range historical linguistics in a way which is totally agnostic to any actual veracity of those claims, and proposals like Altaic have their own equivalent template already. Warrenmck ( talk) 02:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC)