This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International criminal law template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
. The link to "extermination" leads to the article on "genocide". The crime against humanity of extermination is not the same as genocide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmatique06 ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
It may be useful to separate out the issue-specific tribunals from the more general purpose courts --i.e. split up the current "Courts" section into two. Just a thought. -- Ben Houston 18:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
At the moment, the “Sources of law” section contains the following topics:
Most of these are not actually sources of law. I suggest we split it into two sections:
Sources of law:
Crimes:
We could probably add a few international conventions (Geneva, Hague, Genocide, Torture) to the sources section as well. I'm not sure what to do with Command responsibility and Universal jurisdiction.
What do you think? Sideshow Bob Roberts 03:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Petri, the Finnish trials are the only one in the list which is national, not international. Also, you are wrong about application of Nürnberg Principles, as they were formulated later than the Finnish law used in the trials, so you had to meant London charter, but. And if you read the text of the law, there is no mention about war of aggression there, as it states: "Joka ratkaisevalla tavalla on vaikuttanut Suomen joutumiseen sotaan vuonna 1941 Sosialististen Neuvostotasavaltain Liittoa taikka Ison-Britannian ja Pohjois-Irlannin Yhtynyttä Kuningaskuntaa vastaan tai estänyt sodan aikana rauhan aikaansaamista,..." (Those who have in definitive way influenced Finland getting into the war against Soviet Union and United Kingdom or who have prevented the peace during the war,...), which could only veeeryyy broadly to be considered as a crime against peace. -- Whiskey 21:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International criminal law template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
. The link to "extermination" leads to the article on "genocide". The crime against humanity of extermination is not the same as genocide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmatique06 ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
It may be useful to separate out the issue-specific tribunals from the more general purpose courts --i.e. split up the current "Courts" section into two. Just a thought. -- Ben Houston 18:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
At the moment, the “Sources of law” section contains the following topics:
Most of these are not actually sources of law. I suggest we split it into two sections:
Sources of law:
Crimes:
We could probably add a few international conventions (Geneva, Hague, Genocide, Torture) to the sources section as well. I'm not sure what to do with Command responsibility and Universal jurisdiction.
What do you think? Sideshow Bob Roberts 03:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Petri, the Finnish trials are the only one in the list which is national, not international. Also, you are wrong about application of Nürnberg Principles, as they were formulated later than the Finnish law used in the trials, so you had to meant London charter, but. And if you read the text of the law, there is no mention about war of aggression there, as it states: "Joka ratkaisevalla tavalla on vaikuttanut Suomen joutumiseen sotaan vuonna 1941 Sosialististen Neuvostotasavaltain Liittoa taikka Ison-Britannian ja Pohjois-Irlannin Yhtynyttä Kuningaskuntaa vastaan tai estänyt sodan aikana rauhan aikaansaamista,..." (Those who have in definitive way influenced Finland getting into the war against Soviet Union and United Kingdom or who have prevented the peace during the war,...), which could only veeeryyy broadly to be considered as a crime against peace. -- Whiskey 21:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)