![]() |
Template:WikiProject Schools is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Schools template. |
|
![]() | Schools Template‑class | ||||||
|
Does this template apply to school districts as well? -- Geopgeop 08:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I have been putting this onto schools articles as and when I see them, but I noticed it uses two categories that dont exist:
Should these be created?
-- Regan123 02:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
The image Image:School.svg looks like it could do with a bit of work. The perspective is wrong and looks a bit messy, shall I work on a tidy up or replace with an image like Image:Apple-book1.svg? Richard Thompson ( Talk! | Contribs) 11:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can't you have that assesment comment as a drop-down or something like most project assesment banners do? The current formatting is really ungainly, and at times ruins the talk page flow. Aditya Kabir 20:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
You can now use the move parameter to specify a move, may need to change namespace at some point Adam McCormick 06:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I have been building this template in parallel and I think its extra features are now sufficiently hidden. I will be merging it back into this template unless there are any objections raised. There should be no visually appreciable difference. Adam McCormick 17:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Articles that were rated before this feature was added are now marked as needing an infobox because it's the default setting. Could someone please change this (or I'll see if I can do it when I have more time)? WODUP 19:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
There has been concern from one editor concerning the amount of space this template takes up. I personally don't see it as an issue because the banner can be nested which will shrink it to a single line, but I'd prefer discussion to a revert war. Please let's discuss the "bloated" nature of this template before we slash it beyond usefulness. Adam McCormick ( talk) 23:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Examples of how the {{ WPSchools}} template will appear under various circumstances can be seen here. There is too much space assigned to the left column pictures, which is casing the template to expand downward and take up more room than required. The template indicates that the "article has been marked as needing an infobox" even though the |needs-infobox= has not been specified or even listed. Some funky text appears below the template with all parameters are listed with no parameters active. The template does not work well when the small parameter is active. GregManninLB ( talk) 00:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
I would be happy to take care of the category renaming. -- GregManninLB ( talk) 14:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth ignoring the "needs-infobox" parameter and treating it as a no, if the class parameter is set to "cat" (or "template")? In addition, is it worth allowing it to have some kind of splits, possibly in line with the stub classes (so for an article that would need an 'Infobox UK school', set to 'UK') -- I imagine this would be relatively easy for a bot to calculate too (So, in the above example, any page that is in, or has as a ancestor category, ' Schools in the United Kingdom'; I only suggest, as the category has over 12,000 pages in it now... -- Ratarsed ( talk) 11:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm just putting a note here so that C-class is add properly so that the Bot may correctly process it. Calebrw ( talk) 01:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I have made several additions to the template to include more robust handling of different page types, the C-Class and responded to several comments. The updated version is located at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools and example usage may be found
here. PLease note that the protection template is commented out and should be uncommented when moving the content over. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
03:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I noticed this: Talk:Friends School Haverford
The "[[Category:School articles without infoboxes|]]" is not added properly. Calebrw ( talk) 19:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I have corrected this error and the fix is posted to
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
21:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The "importance" parameter is hidden for non-article assessments, I've updated the categories to reflect this. The fixed version is at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Thanks and let me know if there are any issues.
Adam McCormick (
talk)
00:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Some of the new edits removed the addition of Stub and Start articles to their importance category I believe the following change needs to be made
Old:
-->{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |start|stub|dab|disambig|disambiguation|cat|category|image|na= |fa|fl|ga|gl|a|b|c|start|stub|list |#default={{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}}
New:
-->{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |dab|disambig|disambiguation|cat|category|image|na= |fa|fl|ga|gl|a|b|c|start|stub|list |#default={{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}}
-- Jh12 ( talk) 16:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to edit this template so that template class functions the same way as cat/category class?
For an example see:
Dbiel ( Talk) 20:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I've fixed this and the fix is sitting at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. PLease remember to re-add {{
pp-template}} when the change is moved. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
21:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
It appears that the template is still adding pages using class=cat to Category:Category-Class school articles instead of the new Category:Category-Class school pages. can this be fixed? Dbiel ( Talk) 06:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Not sure why this wasn't changed when the other cats were, but I've fixed this and the fix is sitting at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Please remember to re-add {{
pp-template}} when the change is moved. Thanks.
Adam McCormick (
talk)
23:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't the bolded part above be removed as not everyone that uses the info field is a member of that team?-- Rockfang ( talk) 05:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school article. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page.
{{
editprotected}}
This template needs to utilize {{classicon}} to add an icon to a grade.--
Unionhawk
Talk
Review
16:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
WPBannerMeta}}
. Feel very free to prepare it in
Template:WPSchools/sandbox, and once it's ready and there's consensus for the switch please request the edit again. --
Amalthea
16:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Indeed I did start a proposed conversion but have not had time either to finish it, or to raise it here yet. I do recommend converting the banner to {{ WPBM}} and can certainly help with it. However the issue of having icons for the quality classes is still being discussed and so this should not be the main reason for doing this. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
This template places an article in WP Schools, which covers "articles about individual schools, school districts, and some general articles". Articles of the last type, e.g. School, articles in Category:School types or Category:Associations of schools, need to be rated for quality and importance (like other articles), but have no use for infoboxes. And yet BoxCrawler will set needs-infobox to "yes" for these articles, even if it was previously "no".
Could there be some way we can declare that articles need to be rated but do not need an infobox, without having it undone by BoxCrawler? (I know about template:infobox BoxCrawler, but that seems an ugly solution for this problem.) Or could BoxCrawler just leave an explicit "no" alone? Kanguole 00:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
Hi-I believe that the sandbox has a WPBM version that is ready to implement, with the full features. I'll be happy to take care of redirecting several project categories to their new names, that are commonly populated by the WPBM template. Thanks --
Funandtrvl (
talk)
07:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
Would anyone be willing to add an auto-assessment (i.e. "|auto=yes
") parameter to this template for bot taggings? It would be greatly appreciated! Cheers,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
00:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
|class=stub
".
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
21:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This template currently advertises the WikiProject as "an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world.". To me the word "attempt" is rather defeatist or lacking in belief that it can be done. This thought came to me seeing it in combination with {{ WikiProject France}} which uses the more positive wording "a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia.". Borrowing that more active leads to a better, stronger advertisment for the merits of the project (imho).
Proposal:
or
I don't really have a preference between the two, and have no objection to other suggestions along these lines. Thryduulf ( talk) 00:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Could someone with TE rights please tweak the template to accept the class=draft. I would do it myself but I don't like tinkering with templates. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It has been suggested at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools that this project add a redirect class. I have already created the relevant category at
Category:Redirect-Class school articles. Please change |QUALITY_SCALE=extended
to |QUALITY_SCALE=inline
and |class={{{class|}}}
to |class={{class mask |{{{class|}}} |FQS=yes |redirect=yes}}
. Thanks.
EyeTripleE (
talk)
08:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
The sort key for the categories of this template (and all other templates) should be "Τ" and not space. See wp:Sortkey. Am I making sense? Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
I'll take this question. in Template:WikiProject Schools/doc there is the following line:
[[Category:WikiProject Schools| ]]
The sortkey is the space after the pipe. You can change this if you want, but it is standard practice as this template is deemed one of the main templates for the WikiProject. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change lines 8–9 of the template source code which currently read:
|QUALITY_SCALE = inline |class={{class mask |{{{class|}}} |FQS=yes |redirect=yes}}
to
|QUALITY_SCALE = subpage |class={{{class|}}}
I've already created the
required subpage with the appropriate parameters for use of the
Class mask template in this manner. If there's reason to prefer the inline format for this template that I'm unaware of, then please import the new parameters from the subpage linked in the preceding sentence instead. —
⚞ 🐈ℛogueScholar
₨Talk🗩 ⚟
My recent
mischief
03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
WikiProject Schools has a successful and well-documented framework for managing articles that require editing to resolve a range of deficiencies, but it suffers from unnecessary fragmentation and fails to make use of more recent conventions for WikiProject workflows. After careful consideration I am requesting these changes to address that situation, being satisfied that it does not impact those who continue to use the existing methods, by adding an equally robust but more centralized and intuitive method to achieve the same range of outcomes. I've already verified that the destination categories exist and reside in the correct containers with appropriate content to facilitate their use and understanding. I'll update the documentation subpage, TemplateData and related project pages accordingly once the changes are complete.
Please replace line 16 (begins |PORTAL_IMG
)of the existing source code with these two lines,
|attention={{{attention|}}} |ATTENTION_CAT = School articles needing attention
and insert the following after line 27 (begins |NOTE_3_CAT
):
|note 4={{{cleanup|{{{needs-cleanup|}}}}}} |NOTE_4_TEXT = This {{pagetype|{{{class|}}}}} has been marked as needing [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|cleanup]]. |NOTE_4_IMAGE = Edit-clear.svg |NOTE_4_CAT = Schools needing cleanup |note 5={{{expert|{{{needs-expert|}}}}}} |NOTE_5_TEXT = This {{pagetype|{{{class|}}}}} has been marked as needing [[Wikipedia:Expert help|attention from an expert]] on schools. |NOTE_5_IMAGE = Ambox important.svg |NOTE_5_CAT = Schools articles needing expert attention |HOOK_NOTE={{WPBannerMeta/hooks/image needed |BANNER_NAME = Template:WikiProject Schools |category = {{{category|¬}}} |needs-image = {{{needs-image|{{{needs-photo}}}}}} |details = {{{image-details|{{{imagedetails|}}}}}} |location = {{{image-in|{{{imagelocation|}}}}}} |LOCATION_CATEGORY = Wikipedia requested images of schools }}
PORTAL_IMG
parameter was removed from the
transcluded meta template nearly
a decade ago after all portal image declarations were centralized on single subpage; it no longer serves any purpose here.Thank you for taking the time to review this request and act as you deem appropriate. — ⚞ ℛogueScholar 🐈 ₨🗩 ⚟ 08:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Template:WikiProject Schools is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WikiProject Schools template. |
|
![]() | Schools Template‑class | ||||||
|
Does this template apply to school districts as well? -- Geopgeop 08:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I have been putting this onto schools articles as and when I see them, but I noticed it uses two categories that dont exist:
Should these be created?
-- Regan123 02:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
The image Image:School.svg looks like it could do with a bit of work. The perspective is wrong and looks a bit messy, shall I work on a tidy up or replace with an image like Image:Apple-book1.svg? Richard Thompson ( Talk! | Contribs) 11:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can't you have that assesment comment as a drop-down or something like most project assesment banners do? The current formatting is really ungainly, and at times ruins the talk page flow. Aditya Kabir 20:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
You can now use the move parameter to specify a move, may need to change namespace at some point Adam McCormick 06:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I have been building this template in parallel and I think its extra features are now sufficiently hidden. I will be merging it back into this template unless there are any objections raised. There should be no visually appreciable difference. Adam McCormick 17:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Articles that were rated before this feature was added are now marked as needing an infobox because it's the default setting. Could someone please change this (or I'll see if I can do it when I have more time)? WODUP 19:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
There has been concern from one editor concerning the amount of space this template takes up. I personally don't see it as an issue because the banner can be nested which will shrink it to a single line, but I'd prefer discussion to a revert war. Please let's discuss the "bloated" nature of this template before we slash it beyond usefulness. Adam McCormick ( talk) 23:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Examples of how the {{ WPSchools}} template will appear under various circumstances can be seen here. There is too much space assigned to the left column pictures, which is casing the template to expand downward and take up more room than required. The template indicates that the "article has been marked as needing an infobox" even though the |needs-infobox= has not been specified or even listed. Some funky text appears below the template with all parameters are listed with no parameters active. The template does not work well when the small parameter is active. GregManninLB ( talk) 00:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
I would be happy to take care of the category renaming. -- GregManninLB ( talk) 14:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth ignoring the "needs-infobox" parameter and treating it as a no, if the class parameter is set to "cat" (or "template")? In addition, is it worth allowing it to have some kind of splits, possibly in line with the stub classes (so for an article that would need an 'Infobox UK school', set to 'UK') -- I imagine this would be relatively easy for a bot to calculate too (So, in the above example, any page that is in, or has as a ancestor category, ' Schools in the United Kingdom'; I only suggest, as the category has over 12,000 pages in it now... -- Ratarsed ( talk) 11:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm just putting a note here so that C-class is add properly so that the Bot may correctly process it. Calebrw ( talk) 01:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I have made several additions to the template to include more robust handling of different page types, the C-Class and responded to several comments. The updated version is located at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools and example usage may be found
here. PLease note that the protection template is commented out and should be uncommented when moving the content over. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
03:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I noticed this: Talk:Friends School Haverford
The "[[Category:School articles without infoboxes|]]" is not added properly. Calebrw ( talk) 19:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I have corrected this error and the fix is posted to
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
21:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The "importance" parameter is hidden for non-article assessments, I've updated the categories to reflect this. The fixed version is at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Thanks and let me know if there are any issues.
Adam McCormick (
talk)
00:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Some of the new edits removed the addition of Stub and Start articles to their importance category I believe the following change needs to be made
Old:
-->{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |start|stub|dab|disambig|disambiguation|cat|category|image|na= |fa|fl|ga|gl|a|b|c|start|stub|list |#default={{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}}
New:
-->{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |dab|disambig|disambiguation|cat|category|image|na= |fa|fl|ga|gl|a|b|c|start|stub|list |#default={{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}}
-- Jh12 ( talk) 16:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to edit this template so that template class functions the same way as cat/category class?
For an example see:
Dbiel ( Talk) 20:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I've fixed this and the fix is sitting at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. PLease remember to re-add {{
pp-template}} when the change is moved. Thanks
Adam McCormick (
talk)
21:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
It appears that the template is still adding pages using class=cat to Category:Category-Class school articles instead of the new Category:Category-Class school pages. can this be fixed? Dbiel ( Talk) 06:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Not sure why this wasn't changed when the other cats were, but I've fixed this and the fix is sitting at
User:Alanbly/WPSchools. Please remember to re-add {{
pp-template}} when the change is moved. Thanks.
Adam McCormick (
talk)
23:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't the bolded part above be removed as not everyone that uses the info field is a member of that team?-- Rockfang ( talk) 05:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school article. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page.
{{
editprotected}}
This template needs to utilize {{classicon}} to add an icon to a grade.--
Unionhawk
Talk
Review
16:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
WPBannerMeta}}
. Feel very free to prepare it in
Template:WPSchools/sandbox, and once it's ready and there's consensus for the switch please request the edit again. --
Amalthea
16:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Indeed I did start a proposed conversion but have not had time either to finish it, or to raise it here yet. I do recommend converting the banner to {{ WPBM}} and can certainly help with it. However the issue of having icons for the quality classes is still being discussed and so this should not be the main reason for doing this. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
This template places an article in WP Schools, which covers "articles about individual schools, school districts, and some general articles". Articles of the last type, e.g. School, articles in Category:School types or Category:Associations of schools, need to be rated for quality and importance (like other articles), but have no use for infoboxes. And yet BoxCrawler will set needs-infobox to "yes" for these articles, even if it was previously "no".
Could there be some way we can declare that articles need to be rated but do not need an infobox, without having it undone by BoxCrawler? (I know about template:infobox BoxCrawler, but that seems an ugly solution for this problem.) Or could BoxCrawler just leave an explicit "no" alone? Kanguole 00:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
Hi-I believe that the sandbox has a WPBM version that is ready to implement, with the full features. I'll be happy to take care of redirecting several project categories to their new names, that are commonly populated by the WPBM template. Thanks --
Funandtrvl (
talk)
07:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
Would anyone be willing to add an auto-assessment (i.e. "|auto=yes
") parameter to this template for bot taggings? It would be greatly appreciated! Cheers,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
00:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
|class=stub
".
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
21:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This template currently advertises the WikiProject as "an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world.". To me the word "attempt" is rather defeatist or lacking in belief that it can be done. This thought came to me seeing it in combination with {{ WikiProject France}} which uses the more positive wording "a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia.". Borrowing that more active leads to a better, stronger advertisment for the merits of the project (imho).
Proposal:
or
I don't really have a preference between the two, and have no objection to other suggestions along these lines. Thryduulf ( talk) 00:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Could someone with TE rights please tweak the template to accept the class=draft. I would do it myself but I don't like tinkering with templates. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It has been suggested at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools that this project add a redirect class. I have already created the relevant category at
Category:Redirect-Class school articles. Please change |QUALITY_SCALE=extended
to |QUALITY_SCALE=inline
and |class={{{class|}}}
to |class={{class mask |{{{class|}}} |FQS=yes |redirect=yes}}
. Thanks.
EyeTripleE (
talk)
08:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
The sort key for the categories of this template (and all other templates) should be "Τ" and not space. See wp:Sortkey. Am I making sense? Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
I'll take this question. in Template:WikiProject Schools/doc there is the following line:
[[Category:WikiProject Schools| ]]
The sortkey is the space after the pipe. You can change this if you want, but it is standard practice as this template is deemed one of the main templates for the WikiProject. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change lines 8–9 of the template source code which currently read:
|QUALITY_SCALE = inline |class={{class mask |{{{class|}}} |FQS=yes |redirect=yes}}
to
|QUALITY_SCALE = subpage |class={{{class|}}}
I've already created the
required subpage with the appropriate parameters for use of the
Class mask template in this manner. If there's reason to prefer the inline format for this template that I'm unaware of, then please import the new parameters from the subpage linked in the preceding sentence instead. —
⚞ 🐈ℛogueScholar
₨Talk🗩 ⚟
My recent
mischief
03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
WikiProject Schools has a successful and well-documented framework for managing articles that require editing to resolve a range of deficiencies, but it suffers from unnecessary fragmentation and fails to make use of more recent conventions for WikiProject workflows. After careful consideration I am requesting these changes to address that situation, being satisfied that it does not impact those who continue to use the existing methods, by adding an equally robust but more centralized and intuitive method to achieve the same range of outcomes. I've already verified that the destination categories exist and reside in the correct containers with appropriate content to facilitate their use and understanding. I'll update the documentation subpage, TemplateData and related project pages accordingly once the changes are complete.
Please replace line 16 (begins |PORTAL_IMG
)of the existing source code with these two lines,
|attention={{{attention|}}} |ATTENTION_CAT = School articles needing attention
and insert the following after line 27 (begins |NOTE_3_CAT
):
|note 4={{{cleanup|{{{needs-cleanup|}}}}}} |NOTE_4_TEXT = This {{pagetype|{{{class|}}}}} has been marked as needing [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|cleanup]]. |NOTE_4_IMAGE = Edit-clear.svg |NOTE_4_CAT = Schools needing cleanup |note 5={{{expert|{{{needs-expert|}}}}}} |NOTE_5_TEXT = This {{pagetype|{{{class|}}}}} has been marked as needing [[Wikipedia:Expert help|attention from an expert]] on schools. |NOTE_5_IMAGE = Ambox important.svg |NOTE_5_CAT = Schools articles needing expert attention |HOOK_NOTE={{WPBannerMeta/hooks/image needed |BANNER_NAME = Template:WikiProject Schools |category = {{{category|¬}}} |needs-image = {{{needs-image|{{{needs-photo}}}}}} |details = {{{image-details|{{{imagedetails|}}}}}} |location = {{{image-in|{{{imagelocation|}}}}}} |LOCATION_CATEGORY = Wikipedia requested images of schools }}
PORTAL_IMG
parameter was removed from the
transcluded meta template nearly
a decade ago after all portal image declarations were centralized on single subpage; it no longer serves any purpose here.Thank you for taking the time to review this request and act as you deem appropriate. — ⚞ ℛogueScholar 🐈 ₨🗩 ⚟ 08:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)