This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
{{ editprotected}}
The version at Template:Football/sandbox introduces the following -
A diff of the changes made can be seen here and all relevant WP1.0 categories have been created.
Could the admin who moves the sandbox across to the main template also re-introduce the padlock icon at the bottom please? Cheers. Nanonic ( talk) 17:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Two in one day? You'll be thinking I buggered up the first edit! (and you'd be right)
It seems that although a lot of people use FL-Class as a separate entity to FA, WP1.0 bot doesn't. Therefore to allow people to use it AND to keep our statistics correctly updated, this edit puts all FL class articles in Category:FA-Class football articles and the correct taskforce FA categories. Why? because WP1.0 bot only currently counts articles in the FA category. List-Class is supported by the bot though, so that doesn't need to change.
An updated version to move across can be found at Template:Football/sandbox ( diff) (remember to re-add the padlock after!) and many thanks to User:Paulbrock for kindly pointing this error out to me. Cheers, Nanonic ( talk) 22:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Does WP1.0 bot recognise FL class yet? –
Pee
Jay
09:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I streamlined Template:Football/doc and created examples of how the template will appear under various parameter scenarios at Template:Football/Examples. Congrats on who ever is maintaining the template: easy-to-read concise code with no extras and everything working as designed. GregManninLB ( talk) 14:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The following line needs to be added for each taskforce,e.g.:
|c|C=[[Category:C-Class football in England articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{
editprotected}}
Any chance someone could add a parameter for the Man Utd taskforce to the template? It's just been created today. –
Pee
Jay
22:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Here's the code:
|-
{{#if:{{{manutd|}}}
{{!}}[[Image:Old Trafford inside 20060726 1.jpg|40px|center]]
{{!}}This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|non-article page|article}} is supported by '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Manchester United task force|Manchester United task force]]'''.
}}
and:
{{#if:{{{manutd|}}}|
[[Category:Manchester United F.C. task force articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{#switch:{{{importance}}}
|High|high=[[Category:High-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|Mid|mid=[[Category:Mid-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|Low|low=[[Category:Low-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|#default=[[Category:Unknown-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
}}
{{#switch:{{{class}}}
|fa|Fa|FA=[[Category:FA-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|a|A=[[Category:A-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|ga|Ga|GA=[[Category:GA-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|b|B=[[Category:B-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|start|Start=[[Category:Start-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|stub|Stub=[[Category:Stub-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|NA|Na|na|Template|template|List|list|Cat|cat=[[Category:Non-article Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|#default=[[Category:Unassessed Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
}}
}}
Is that everything you need? – Pee Jay 11:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
I'm just wondering that there is no parameter for a page in scope of Wiki Project German Football. While the project doesn't seem to have been very active in recent months (no offense), I have created several sites and am somewhat envious to the English, Spanish, Italian, etc. who have this beautyful National football on their talkpage.
Is there a good reason (one other than "It just wasn't done yet") why there is no such parameter? If there is not could you please add it?
Regards,
OdinFK (
talk) 16:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The version at the
template:football/sandbox introduces the "Germany=yes" and "germany=yes" variables (both do the same thing) with the German flag as the icon and has been tested. All WP1.0 categories have been created. And to answer your question OdinFK - it was just never requested. There are still a few sub-projects that either use their own banners or don't gather statistics for WP1.0.
Nanonic (
talk)
18:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
There's an extra line of whitespace below this template. Can someone remove the responsible line break, please? (for that matter, does this really need to be fully protected?) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
{| class="{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{nested|}}}}}|yes|collapsible collapsed tmbox nested-talk|{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{small|}}}}}|yes|tmbox small-talk|tmbox standard-talk}}}}"Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
After a request on Template talk:WPBannerMeta, I've had a shot at converting this template to the Meta one. Take a look at Template:Football/sandbox and Template:Football/testcases and feel free to make changes. Non-League and Irish football I couldn't find categories for so I added a link to a non-existant one. — Borgarde talk 10:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
Anyone wanna update them? It's been a while with no objections even after notifying the project. It'll end up being easier to update and just a few new categories being created. Thanks. — Borgarde talk 03:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
England=yes
. Also, the nested version is a bit of a mess - is there anyway it can just display WikiProject Football on nesting as it does currently?
Nanonic (
talk)
05:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC){{ editprotect}}
I have addressed all concerns raised above and the banner is now working exactly how it should behave. The code is at Template:Football/sandbox and the testpage is at Template:Football/testcases. Can an admin please replace this page with the code from Template:Football/sandbox, excluding the first sandbox line? Thanks! — Borgarde talk 06:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Is there any chance that the taskforce-specific importance parameters could be made optional? All of the articles related to the Man Utd taskforce have lost their importance because of recent changes, and it's really rather infuriating that I now have to go through the entire lot just so that the statistics table works properly. – Pee Jay 12:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Does the Man-Utd use the main importance? Because this is easy to implement, it simple means changing {{ManUtd-importance|}} to {{importance|}} in the code. It is no biggy. — Borgarde talk 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
I don't even know whether this is the right place to ask, but it seems as good a place as any to me. The article importance categories inside Project German football don't work any more. Have a look! Other than Saxony-Anhalt Cup there are just no-importance articles despite almost all articles being correctly tagged. The really strange part is that the articles are in the right categories in project football. Probably the last update of this template broke something. The template has become much smaller as far as I can see.
Regards, OdinFK ( talk) 15:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
The two points mentioned above are now fixed. Code is at Template:Football/sandbox. Please update accordingly. — Borgarde talk 00:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
In response to PJ, if you ever want to use your own importances, change the following:
|TF_3_IMPORTANCE = yes |tf 3 importance={{{importance|}}}
to
|TF_3_IMPORTANCE = yes |tf 3 importance={{{ManUtd-importance|{{{manutd-importance|}}}}}}
All that specifies is the importance parameter, which as of now is just "importance=". — Borgarde talk 12:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
Based on the fixes above, can someone please replace the current code with the code at
Template:Football/sandbox, which has fixed this wider problem of task-force importance ratings. —
Borgarde
talk
12:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Please could someone undo the edits that destroyed the importance ratings for Argentine football articles ( Wikipedia:ArF#Assessment) as has been done for the other projects above. E P 20:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}} Please update the template with the code from Template:Football/sandbox to include the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran football. — Borgarde talk 05:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. --
El
on
ka
01:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC){{ editprotect}}
I believe the taskforce parameter values are case sensitive, so for example, England=yes would categorize the talk page, whereas England=Yes would not. Would it be possible to make it case insensitive? Thanks. -- Jameboy ( talk) 00:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
The code is now updated at Template:Football/sandbox to allow for this. Please update. — Borgarde talk 02:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way to merge or change the destination category for |infobox-needed? It seems the new template uses Category:Football articles needing infoboxes instead of the pre-existing Category:Articles that need a football biography infobox that was populated by {{ needs football biography infobox}}. I guess either could be changed but note that the original is situated within WP:BIOs Category:Sports and games work group articles needing infoboxes. Nanonic ( talk) 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Please update the template with the code from Template:Football/sandbox to include the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Persepolis F.C. . Shahin ( talk) 14:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a comment. The project can be added to the banner without assessment, like Irish footy and Non-League do. And if it progresses in the future that the project thinks they need assessment then it can be changed easily by just typing a 'yes' into the code. — Borgarde talk 03:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone explain why the football box on this talkpage is not nested? King of the North East 20:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
{{ editprotected}}
The version at Template:Football/sandbox introduces the following -
A diff of the changes made can be seen here and all relevant WP1.0 categories have been created.
Could the admin who moves the sandbox across to the main template also re-introduce the padlock icon at the bottom please? Cheers. Nanonic ( talk) 17:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Two in one day? You'll be thinking I buggered up the first edit! (and you'd be right)
It seems that although a lot of people use FL-Class as a separate entity to FA, WP1.0 bot doesn't. Therefore to allow people to use it AND to keep our statistics correctly updated, this edit puts all FL class articles in Category:FA-Class football articles and the correct taskforce FA categories. Why? because WP1.0 bot only currently counts articles in the FA category. List-Class is supported by the bot though, so that doesn't need to change.
An updated version to move across can be found at Template:Football/sandbox ( diff) (remember to re-add the padlock after!) and many thanks to User:Paulbrock for kindly pointing this error out to me. Cheers, Nanonic ( talk) 22:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Does WP1.0 bot recognise FL class yet? –
Pee
Jay
09:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I streamlined Template:Football/doc and created examples of how the template will appear under various parameter scenarios at Template:Football/Examples. Congrats on who ever is maintaining the template: easy-to-read concise code with no extras and everything working as designed. GregManninLB ( talk) 14:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The following line needs to be added for each taskforce,e.g.:
|c|C=[[Category:C-Class football in England articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{
editprotected}}
Any chance someone could add a parameter for the Man Utd taskforce to the template? It's just been created today. –
Pee
Jay
22:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Here's the code:
|-
{{#if:{{{manutd|}}}
{{!}}[[Image:Old Trafford inside 20060726 1.jpg|40px|center]]
{{!}}This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|non-article page|article}} is supported by '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Manchester United task force|Manchester United task force]]'''.
}}
and:
{{#if:{{{manutd|}}}|
[[Category:Manchester United F.C. task force articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{#switch:{{{importance}}}
|High|high=[[Category:High-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|Mid|mid=[[Category:Mid-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|Low|low=[[Category:Low-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|#default=[[Category:Unknown-importance Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
}}
{{#switch:{{{class}}}
|fa|Fa|FA=[[Category:FA-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|a|A=[[Category:A-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|ga|Ga|GA=[[Category:GA-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|b|B=[[Category:B-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|start|Start=[[Category:Start-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|stub|Stub=[[Category:Stub-Class Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|NA|Na|na|Template|template|List|list|Cat|cat=[[Category:Non-article Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
|#default=[[Category:Unassessed Manchester United F.C. articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
}}
}}
Is that everything you need? – Pee Jay 11:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
I'm just wondering that there is no parameter for a page in scope of Wiki Project German Football. While the project doesn't seem to have been very active in recent months (no offense), I have created several sites and am somewhat envious to the English, Spanish, Italian, etc. who have this beautyful National football on their talkpage.
Is there a good reason (one other than "It just wasn't done yet") why there is no such parameter? If there is not could you please add it?
Regards,
OdinFK (
talk) 16:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The version at the
template:football/sandbox introduces the "Germany=yes" and "germany=yes" variables (both do the same thing) with the German flag as the icon and has been tested. All WP1.0 categories have been created. And to answer your question OdinFK - it was just never requested. There are still a few sub-projects that either use their own banners or don't gather statistics for WP1.0.
Nanonic (
talk)
18:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
There's an extra line of whitespace below this template. Can someone remove the responsible line break, please? (for that matter, does this really need to be fully protected?) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
{| class="{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{nested|}}}}}|yes|collapsible collapsed tmbox nested-talk|{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{small|}}}}}|yes|tmbox small-talk|tmbox standard-talk}}}}"Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
After a request on Template talk:WPBannerMeta, I've had a shot at converting this template to the Meta one. Take a look at Template:Football/sandbox and Template:Football/testcases and feel free to make changes. Non-League and Irish football I couldn't find categories for so I added a link to a non-existant one. — Borgarde talk 10:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
Anyone wanna update them? It's been a while with no objections even after notifying the project. It'll end up being easier to update and just a few new categories being created. Thanks. — Borgarde talk 03:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
England=yes
. Also, the nested version is a bit of a mess - is there anyway it can just display WikiProject Football on nesting as it does currently?
Nanonic (
talk)
05:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC){{ editprotect}}
I have addressed all concerns raised above and the banner is now working exactly how it should behave. The code is at Template:Football/sandbox and the testpage is at Template:Football/testcases. Can an admin please replace this page with the code from Template:Football/sandbox, excluding the first sandbox line? Thanks! — Borgarde talk 06:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Is there any chance that the taskforce-specific importance parameters could be made optional? All of the articles related to the Man Utd taskforce have lost their importance because of recent changes, and it's really rather infuriating that I now have to go through the entire lot just so that the statistics table works properly. – Pee Jay 12:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Does the Man-Utd use the main importance? Because this is easy to implement, it simple means changing {{ManUtd-importance|}} to {{importance|}} in the code. It is no biggy. — Borgarde talk 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
I don't even know whether this is the right place to ask, but it seems as good a place as any to me. The article importance categories inside Project German football don't work any more. Have a look! Other than Saxony-Anhalt Cup there are just no-importance articles despite almost all articles being correctly tagged. The really strange part is that the articles are in the right categories in project football. Probably the last update of this template broke something. The template has become much smaller as far as I can see.
Regards, OdinFK ( talk) 15:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
The two points mentioned above are now fixed. Code is at Template:Football/sandbox. Please update accordingly. — Borgarde talk 00:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
In response to PJ, if you ever want to use your own importances, change the following:
|TF_3_IMPORTANCE = yes |tf 3 importance={{{importance|}}}
to
|TF_3_IMPORTANCE = yes |tf 3 importance={{{ManUtd-importance|{{{manutd-importance|}}}}}}
All that specifies is the importance parameter, which as of now is just "importance=". — Borgarde talk 12:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
Based on the fixes above, can someone please replace the current code with the code at
Template:Football/sandbox, which has fixed this wider problem of task-force importance ratings. —
Borgarde
talk
12:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Please could someone undo the edits that destroyed the importance ratings for Argentine football articles ( Wikipedia:ArF#Assessment) as has been done for the other projects above. E P 20:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}} Please update the template with the code from Template:Football/sandbox to include the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran football. — Borgarde talk 05:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. --
El
on
ka
01:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC){{ editprotect}}
I believe the taskforce parameter values are case sensitive, so for example, England=yes would categorize the talk page, whereas England=Yes would not. Would it be possible to make it case insensitive? Thanks. -- Jameboy ( talk) 00:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotect}}
The code is now updated at Template:Football/sandbox to allow for this. Please update. — Borgarde talk 02:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way to merge or change the destination category for |infobox-needed? It seems the new template uses Category:Football articles needing infoboxes instead of the pre-existing Category:Articles that need a football biography infobox that was populated by {{ needs football biography infobox}}. I guess either could be changed but note that the original is situated within WP:BIOs Category:Sports and games work group articles needing infoboxes. Nanonic ( talk) 02:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Please update the template with the code from Template:Football/sandbox to include the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Persepolis F.C. . Shahin ( talk) 14:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a comment. The project can be added to the banner without assessment, like Irish footy and Non-League do. And if it progresses in the future that the project thinks they need assessment then it can be changed easily by just typing a 'yes' into the code. — Borgarde talk 03:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone explain why the football box on this talkpage is not nested? King of the North East 20:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)