Board and table games Template‑class | |||||||
|
Science Fiction Template‑class | |||||||
|
I like the look of this, but I think there are far too many links in it at the moment. At a first pass, I'd drop all the links under the 'Warhammer 40,000' heading, Emperor, History of the IG, Navy, Horus, perhaps the four Chaos gods (replace with a link to Chaos (Warhammer)) and all the Eldar sub-heading links. Cheers -- Pak21 13:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
I think removing the edit link might be a good idea. It's sort of out of place and breaks up the template. I think it may also cause some problems as it makes it much easier to edit, and might prompt some to make edits without really thinking about it or discussing it. Just my two cents though.
Oh yeah, nice job! --
Falcorian
(talk) 00:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Is there a reason the Space Marines aren't listed in the template? Cheers -- Pak21 14:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Surely this can be expanded, can it not? I mean, all it's doing now is displaying the main armies of the game, there are loads more things that could be added to this. This is hardly a 'Warhammer 40,000' template, just a 'main army' template. If possible I would like to seriously expand this, there are loads more things that could be put into this, such as important Characters, planets, events, and even some minor Gods. In all, this could be made larger to look similar to the Star Wars Template. I want to get people's opinions before I start pissing around with it. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 00:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I think the Locations section should only include links to those planets (and the Eye) that have their own articles and have been the scenes of major campaigns (so, only Armageddon, Cadia and Medusa V) and then also to Planets of Warhammer 40,000. I also think the Games section should only include current games so, as much as I love Gorkamorka, I think it should be replaced by Inquisitor and Battlefleet Gothic. Any objections? - Heavens To Betsy 10:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Looks much better! Well done! -- Falcorian (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000#Inclusion of the category attribute. Chris Cunningham 14:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Little trivial, aren't they? I think they should be merged to 'Orders Militant' or possibly 'Inquisition' - organisations at a similar level in the Imperial hierarchy fluffwise. Thoughts? Sojourner001 ( talk) 13:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Why are the Chaos gods not included? They are a pretty major part of the campaign. 66.159.69.132 ( talk) 14:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Board and table games Template‑class | |||||||
|
Science Fiction Template‑class | |||||||
|
I like the look of this, but I think there are far too many links in it at the moment. At a first pass, I'd drop all the links under the 'Warhammer 40,000' heading, Emperor, History of the IG, Navy, Horus, perhaps the four Chaos gods (replace with a link to Chaos (Warhammer)) and all the Eldar sub-heading links. Cheers -- Pak21 13:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
I think removing the edit link might be a good idea. It's sort of out of place and breaks up the template. I think it may also cause some problems as it makes it much easier to edit, and might prompt some to make edits without really thinking about it or discussing it. Just my two cents though.
Oh yeah, nice job! --
Falcorian
(talk) 00:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Is there a reason the Space Marines aren't listed in the template? Cheers -- Pak21 14:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Surely this can be expanded, can it not? I mean, all it's doing now is displaying the main armies of the game, there are loads more things that could be added to this. This is hardly a 'Warhammer 40,000' template, just a 'main army' template. If possible I would like to seriously expand this, there are loads more things that could be put into this, such as important Characters, planets, events, and even some minor Gods. In all, this could be made larger to look similar to the Star Wars Template. I want to get people's opinions before I start pissing around with it. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 00:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I think the Locations section should only include links to those planets (and the Eye) that have their own articles and have been the scenes of major campaigns (so, only Armageddon, Cadia and Medusa V) and then also to Planets of Warhammer 40,000. I also think the Games section should only include current games so, as much as I love Gorkamorka, I think it should be replaced by Inquisitor and Battlefleet Gothic. Any objections? - Heavens To Betsy 10:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Looks much better! Well done! -- Falcorian (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000#Inclusion of the category attribute. Chris Cunningham 14:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Little trivial, aren't they? I think they should be merged to 'Orders Militant' or possibly 'Inquisition' - organisations at a similar level in the Imperial hierarchy fluffwise. Thoughts? Sojourner001 ( talk) 13:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Why are the Chaos gods not included? They are a pretty major part of the campaign. 66.159.69.132 ( talk) 14:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)