Palaeontology Template‑class | |||||||
|
I have removed the "Cambrian Explosion taskforce" as an option for this template since the taskforce is included under WikiProject Geology, and could cause potential confusion if listed under both. Additionally, the option was not functioning properly before I removed it. Hza a 9 ( talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Hza a 9 ( talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Would like the following code added to accept image requests and populate the existing Category:Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology.
|note 1 = {{{needs-image|{{{needs-photo|}}}}}} |NOTE_1_TEXT = It is requested that a '''picture''' or '''pictures''' be [[Wikipedia:Uploading images|included]] in this article to [[Wikipedia:Guide to improving articles|improve its quality]]. |NOTE_1_IMAGE = Image-request.svg |NOTE_1_CAT = Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
Nessie ( talk) 16:01, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Please join the discussion on the proposed merge from Template:WikiProject Pterosaurs to Template:WikiProject Palaeontology. -- Nessie ( talk) 13:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
@ PC78, FunkMonk, and Trialpears: you volunteered to clean up after the merge of {{ WikiProject Pterosaurs}}. Seems atleast 45 pages got removed from Category:Wikipedia requested images of pterosaurs ( 62 ) by [[User:[PrimeBOT|[PrimeBOT]]. Examples include Talk:Graphical timeline of pterosaurs and Talk:Mythunga. I can't figure out how to get them back in the category using {{ WikiProject Palaeontology}}. -- Nessie ( talk) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|TF_3_HOOK =
with {{
WPBannerMeta/hooks/cats}} inside that subtemplate for the extra Pterosaur categories. If you need any more help with it just ping me again.
PC78 (
talk) 19:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Palaeontology/sandbox}}
, which is itself probably a mistake. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 19:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Palaeontology|pterosaurs=yes|pterosaurs-importance=high}}
. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk) 18:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|needs-image=
in {{
WikiProject Palaeontology}} wasn't populating the Pterosaurs category, an oversight which appears to have been corrected based on the discussion above and edits to the template.
Primefac (
talk) 14:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Whilst working on the Special:WantedCategories backlog, I've come across Category:NA-importance Book-Class Palaeontology articles. Looking at the three books within it, I suspect that the red-linked category (in breach of WP:REDNOT has been introduced by changes to this template, that books previously didn't have an importance set but now NA is being set by default. Is this the intended behaviour? I'm not too fussed either way, I just want the category either created or the template to not to display the red link category... Le Deluge ( talk) 16:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Palaeontology Template‑class | |||||||
|
I have removed the "Cambrian Explosion taskforce" as an option for this template since the taskforce is included under WikiProject Geology, and could cause potential confusion if listed under both. Additionally, the option was not functioning properly before I removed it. Hza a 9 ( talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Hza a 9 ( talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Would like the following code added to accept image requests and populate the existing Category:Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology.
|note 1 = {{{needs-image|{{{needs-photo|}}}}}} |NOTE_1_TEXT = It is requested that a '''picture''' or '''pictures''' be [[Wikipedia:Uploading images|included]] in this article to [[Wikipedia:Guide to improving articles|improve its quality]]. |NOTE_1_IMAGE = Image-request.svg |NOTE_1_CAT = Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
Nessie ( talk) 16:01, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Please join the discussion on the proposed merge from Template:WikiProject Pterosaurs to Template:WikiProject Palaeontology. -- Nessie ( talk) 13:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
@ PC78, FunkMonk, and Trialpears: you volunteered to clean up after the merge of {{ WikiProject Pterosaurs}}. Seems atleast 45 pages got removed from Category:Wikipedia requested images of pterosaurs ( 62 ) by [[User:[PrimeBOT|[PrimeBOT]]. Examples include Talk:Graphical timeline of pterosaurs and Talk:Mythunga. I can't figure out how to get them back in the category using {{ WikiProject Palaeontology}}. -- Nessie ( talk) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|TF_3_HOOK =
with {{
WPBannerMeta/hooks/cats}} inside that subtemplate for the extra Pterosaur categories. If you need any more help with it just ping me again.
PC78 (
talk) 19:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Palaeontology/sandbox}}
, which is itself probably a mistake. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 19:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Palaeontology|pterosaurs=yes|pterosaurs-importance=high}}
. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk) 18:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|needs-image=
in {{
WikiProject Palaeontology}} wasn't populating the Pterosaurs category, an oversight which appears to have been corrected based on the discussion above and edits to the template.
Primefac (
talk) 14:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Whilst working on the Special:WantedCategories backlog, I've come across Category:NA-importance Book-Class Palaeontology articles. Looking at the three books within it, I suspect that the red-linked category (in breach of WP:REDNOT has been introduced by changes to this template, that books previously didn't have an importance set but now NA is being set by default. Is this the intended behaviour? I'm not too fussed either way, I just want the category either created or the template to not to display the red link category... Le Deluge ( talk) 16:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)