![]() |
Template:WikiProject Astronomy is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | Astronomy Template‑class | ||||||
|
This template needs an update due to the new preprocessor. I noticed a helpful comment at Template_talk:!#New_preprocessor. I've tried to update the template at User:Sverdrup/WPAstronomy. Please verify that it works.
A "test rendering" is at User:Sverdrup/test1
The problem: the localurl magic word doesn't work with the { {! } } template anymore, and this breaks the edit, history, etc links when an article has comments. Let's update the template as soon as someone has verified the changes are sound. -- Sverdrup ( talk) 17:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
I forgot some = signs assigning bad categories to category-class and template-class articles.
replace
|Category|category|CAT|Cat|cat|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}} |Template|template|TEMP|Temp|temp|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}
by
|Category|category|CAT|Cat|cat=[[Category:Category-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}} |Template|template|TEMP|Temp|temp=[[Category:Template-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}
I also have to do some maintenance to optimize code that. Semi protecting the page for a day would allow me to update the code. Headbomb { ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 13:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm seeing some format issues when I view this template in an IE browser. (It seems okay in Firefox.) On talk pages where there is an assessment rating, the text description is writing over the white box on the left side. An example is here: Talk:Thuban. Could this possibly be fixed? Right now it looks a little unpolished. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 18:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
(It's funny where the Random article button takes you.) Noticed in the WPAstronomy template on 3949 Mach, when an article is rated "Low" the phrasing that appears after it is: "This page has been identified as being of Low-Low-Importance within Astronomy." Noticed the same thing on the example of the template, where "NA" appears twice. I know I'm not smart enough to try to fix this. Reaching out to those that are. Gnowor ( talk) 05:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to replace the bottom (i) template section (with the "ratings summary page" link) by something similar to the "Comments about these ratings" box that is used on the Physics template? The latter is nicely implemented and it would get rid of that distracting red link text that shows up on virtually every talk page. (Few people bother to generate a ratings comments page.) Thank you!— RJH ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Why is the importance parameter not listed in the documentation? I suggest changing the page to:
{{WikiProject Astronomy |class=XXX |importance=<!--Top/High/Mid/Low/NA--> |object=yes |astrophysics=yes }}
{{stubclass}}
template.- Anthony Rushton ( talk) 10:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
The meta banner doesn't do many of the things the old banner did. Please revert. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 03:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
|nested=
parameter to trigger nesting inside banner shells, deprecated|class=
parameter values returns incorrect logic (will treat |class=cheesecake
as valid input!).|class=
values (some areas treated "FA" as "fa", others didn't){{
WPBannerMeta}}
.
Happy‑
melon
00:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Well for starters, the metabanner doesn't categorize articles into their respective "X-class Astronomy articles" and "Y-importance Astronomy articles" categories, and doesn't flag those with |astrophysics=yes as being physics articles that should be tagged with a physics template instead, nor does it tag them those with |objects=yes as being WP objects articles of X-class etc... It also does not support the comment box. The template code is currently going under revision so it can support category intersections (see User:Headbomb/Sandbox4, edit at will). I'm all for improving the code, but unilaterally editing a protected page without even mentioning something about it first is not how one should go about to do things. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 06:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
|COMMENT_FORCE=yes
, you can invoke a "please leave comments" message when the page does not exist, which is superior to the simple redlink in any case. I don't think your concerns are correct.
Happy‑
melon
15:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
|nested=yes
. The defaultsort issue is serious, as not passing a correct |listas=
parameter will actively break correct syntax in other banners on the page. And regarding your white boxes, have you tried resizing your browser window to about a third of the screen? That's what it looks like on low-resolution monitors. Now go to
http://en.wikipedia/org/?title=User:Headbomb/Sandbox4&handheld=1 - that's what it looks like on mobile phones. Try the same actions on
Template:WikiProject Astronomy/sandbox.{{
WPBannerMeta}}
is used on over half a million pages, and there are prominent notices on every template page to funnel such bug reports to
Template talk:WPBannerMeta where they can be acted upon. As a consequence, the majority of these bugs have been fixed or resolved. You're clearly a talented template coder; there are thousands of much more prominent templates for which a 'new wheel' needs to be discovered, new ideas applied to fix old problems. There are plenty of imperfections in {{
WPBannerMeta}}
itself that would benefit from some attention; the documentation at
Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage is a complete mess, for instance. There are better things for you to do with your time and talents than reinvent the wheel on this project banner.
Happy‑
melon
12:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)(unindent)
|category=no
, every time a category is supposed to be invoked, the value of |category=
is compared against "μ" and the category is only added if they are equal (ie, nothing has been passed to the category parameter at any point in the chain). Since we've got hardcoded category additions (most of the category links are buried deep inside the banner code) the slightly obscure syntax is quite visible, but it's entirely harmless. Good question though!
Happy‑
melon
17:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)I created User:Ruslik0/Sandbox1 a draft version of {{ WPSpace}} template (see also User_Talk:Ruslik0/Sandbox1). Comments are appreciated. Ruslik ( talk) 10:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
{{{class}}}
conditionals for importance and quality scale triggers?
Happy‑
melon
17:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Astronomy}}
?? I'm minded to restore the meta-template code given the way this discussion has progressed; if anyone objects do please speak up.
Happy‑
melon
23:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Could you turn the full scale on? Or at least enable template, category, disambig, redirect, and image? Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 20:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
The stub-class isn't included in the custom categories.
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|μ}}}|μ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!--
should be updated to
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|μ}}}|μ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!--
Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I think a better message would be
Same goes for the {{ physics}} template which is currently without such a message. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 13:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Per
this discussion, there was consensus (or at least no objection) to adding a {{
Bottom-importance}} rating to this template. Please could this be implemented? Once this is complete we can set up the bottom-importance category and begin to populate it. Thank you.—
RJH (
talk)
20:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I believe that
File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg is a better image for Project Astronomical Objects, and is also consistent with the image for the portal and Astronomy, being another astrophoto.
70.29.208.129 (
talk)
15:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
The current image Pleiades large.jpg has been deleted from commons. Please replace it in the template -- Raziman T V ( talk) 18:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
After deleting Category:Pages within the scope of WikiProject Physics (WP Astronomy Banner) as an empty category, TimothyRias wrote a message in my talk page that the template "is used for a legacy feature of the {{ astronomy}} template, which allows the astro=yes switch to tag articles which should also have the {{ physics}} template. This category lists the articles that use that switch (which should then be tagged and assessed.) If this seems like a roundabout way of doing things, thats because it is. But as long as that option exists on the {{ astronomy}} template, this category should exist to record its use."'.
So there are some things:
-- Magioladitis ( talk) 16:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Please write any comments in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Thanks, Magioladitis ( talk) 01:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
|astrophysics=
parameter. --
Magioladitis (
talk)
14:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC){{
editprotected}}
currently the project template can have a link to wikiproject Astronomy Objects rather than Astronomy object which necessitates a redirect i.e the actual project has a lowercase 'o'. this is a problem when using popups as it goes to the redirect page when adding a new topic [1], pls fix
Tom B (
talk)
20:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could someone change
Extended content
|
---|
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|¬}}}|¬ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!-- to *** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|¬}}}|¬ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |redirect=Redirect-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!-- |
Thanks. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 18:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The link to the WP:ASTRO importance ratings has gone away again. Can this be restored? I believe a separate ratings list is strongly encouraged per Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria#WikiProject importance assessments, so it is unclear why that link would be removed. Removing the link also makes my efforts to rate all the astronomy pages pointless, and so I'll stop for now. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 23:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
When the WPAstronomy template on an article is set to a "bottom" importance, the talk page is still being categorized under category:Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Unknown-importance (for a stub article) instead of category:Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Bottom-importance. Please could an Admin address that? Or is there another place I should report it? Thank you.— RJH ( talk) 20:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Since we don't have an Astronomy-specific quality scale, should the QUALITY_SCALE parameter be set back to standard for now? The current link is not very useful. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 16:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
|ASSESSMENT_LINK=no
but then you will lose the link to the specific importance ratings. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk)
17:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I've asked a question regarding the use of the WPSpace banner here. Please reply on that talk page; thanks! :) Mlm42 ( talk) 20:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
{{edit protected}} Hello, the format of file:Nuvola mimetypes info.png is PNG. The same image exists in SVG format. Please change Nuvola mimetypes info.png to Gnome-mime-text-x-credits.svg. Nodulation ( talk) 00:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
See here for suggested changes. Bring the template in line with other banners, the extra <includeonly> tags can be omitted now, as substcheck prevents improper substitutions of itself now. qedk ( t 桜 c) 14:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
WPBannerMeta/sandbox}}
? --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
16:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Most if not all articles with the {{ WikiProject Solar System}} template will also have this template. I think it would reduce maintenance to allow the former to be incorporated into the latter via a 'solarsystem' option. It should cause a 'File:Planets2013.svg' image to be displayed in the template. The concern may be whether separate importance tables can be assembled based on whether this option is set. But it appears that is already being done for {{ WikiProject Mars}}, so a 'mars' option would also be needed. Praemonitus ( talk) 17:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
As a topic for discussion, I'd like to propose that we try setting this template's importance field as follows:
|importance={{#switch: {{lc:{{{class}}}}}
| category = na
| redirect = na
| file = na
| portal = na
| redirect = na
| template = na
| #default = {{{importance|}}}
}}
In cases where an editor does not let the template autoconfigure 'redirect' articles, setting both 'class' and 'importance', this should force the 'importance' field to 'na' as per the default. ( Here is an example.) The goal is to reduce maintenance of the selected 'class' categories. This will need testing, of course. Praemonitus ( talk) 05:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
|importance=top
/ remove it from existing templates? It's a rather trivial thing to do with AWB.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
16:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Template:WikiProject Astronomy is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | Astronomy Template‑class | ||||||
|
This template needs an update due to the new preprocessor. I noticed a helpful comment at Template_talk:!#New_preprocessor. I've tried to update the template at User:Sverdrup/WPAstronomy. Please verify that it works.
A "test rendering" is at User:Sverdrup/test1
The problem: the localurl magic word doesn't work with the { {! } } template anymore, and this breaks the edit, history, etc links when an article has comments. Let's update the template as soon as someone has verified the changes are sound. -- Sverdrup ( talk) 17:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
I forgot some = signs assigning bad categories to category-class and template-class articles.
replace
|Category|category|CAT|Cat|cat|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}} |Template|template|TEMP|Temp|temp|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}
by
|Category|category|CAT|Cat|cat=[[Category:Category-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Category-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}} |Template|template|TEMP|Temp|temp=[[Category:Template-Class Astronomy articles]] {{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class Astronomical Objects articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}{{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Template-Class physics articles{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]|}}
I also have to do some maintenance to optimize code that. Semi protecting the page for a day would allow me to update the code. Headbomb { ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 13:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm seeing some format issues when I view this template in an IE browser. (It seems okay in Firefox.) On talk pages where there is an assessment rating, the text description is writing over the white box on the left side. An example is here: Talk:Thuban. Could this possibly be fixed? Right now it looks a little unpolished. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 18:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
(It's funny where the Random article button takes you.) Noticed in the WPAstronomy template on 3949 Mach, when an article is rated "Low" the phrasing that appears after it is: "This page has been identified as being of Low-Low-Importance within Astronomy." Noticed the same thing on the example of the template, where "NA" appears twice. I know I'm not smart enough to try to fix this. Reaching out to those that are. Gnowor ( talk) 05:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to replace the bottom (i) template section (with the "ratings summary page" link) by something similar to the "Comments about these ratings" box that is used on the Physics template? The latter is nicely implemented and it would get rid of that distracting red link text that shows up on virtually every talk page. (Few people bother to generate a ratings comments page.) Thank you!— RJH ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Why is the importance parameter not listed in the documentation? I suggest changing the page to:
{{WikiProject Astronomy |class=XXX |importance=<!--Top/High/Mid/Low/NA--> |object=yes |astrophysics=yes }}
{{stubclass}}
template.- Anthony Rushton ( talk) 10:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
The meta banner doesn't do many of the things the old banner did. Please revert. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 03:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
|nested=
parameter to trigger nesting inside banner shells, deprecated|class=
parameter values returns incorrect logic (will treat |class=cheesecake
as valid input!).|class=
values (some areas treated "FA" as "fa", others didn't){{
WPBannerMeta}}
.
Happy‑
melon
00:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Well for starters, the metabanner doesn't categorize articles into their respective "X-class Astronomy articles" and "Y-importance Astronomy articles" categories, and doesn't flag those with |astrophysics=yes as being physics articles that should be tagged with a physics template instead, nor does it tag them those with |objects=yes as being WP objects articles of X-class etc... It also does not support the comment box. The template code is currently going under revision so it can support category intersections (see User:Headbomb/Sandbox4, edit at will). I'm all for improving the code, but unilaterally editing a protected page without even mentioning something about it first is not how one should go about to do things. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 06:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
|COMMENT_FORCE=yes
, you can invoke a "please leave comments" message when the page does not exist, which is superior to the simple redlink in any case. I don't think your concerns are correct.
Happy‑
melon
15:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
|nested=yes
. The defaultsort issue is serious, as not passing a correct |listas=
parameter will actively break correct syntax in other banners on the page. And regarding your white boxes, have you tried resizing your browser window to about a third of the screen? That's what it looks like on low-resolution monitors. Now go to
http://en.wikipedia/org/?title=User:Headbomb/Sandbox4&handheld=1 - that's what it looks like on mobile phones. Try the same actions on
Template:WikiProject Astronomy/sandbox.{{
WPBannerMeta}}
is used on over half a million pages, and there are prominent notices on every template page to funnel such bug reports to
Template talk:WPBannerMeta where they can be acted upon. As a consequence, the majority of these bugs have been fixed or resolved. You're clearly a talented template coder; there are thousands of much more prominent templates for which a 'new wheel' needs to be discovered, new ideas applied to fix old problems. There are plenty of imperfections in {{
WPBannerMeta}}
itself that would benefit from some attention; the documentation at
Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage is a complete mess, for instance. There are better things for you to do with your time and talents than reinvent the wheel on this project banner.
Happy‑
melon
12:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)(unindent)
|category=no
, every time a category is supposed to be invoked, the value of |category=
is compared against "μ" and the category is only added if they are equal (ie, nothing has been passed to the category parameter at any point in the chain). Since we've got hardcoded category additions (most of the category links are buried deep inside the banner code) the slightly obscure syntax is quite visible, but it's entirely harmless. Good question though!
Happy‑
melon
17:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)I created User:Ruslik0/Sandbox1 a draft version of {{ WPSpace}} template (see also User_Talk:Ruslik0/Sandbox1). Comments are appreciated. Ruslik ( talk) 10:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
{{{class}}}
conditionals for importance and quality scale triggers?
Happy‑
melon
17:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Astronomy}}
?? I'm minded to restore the meta-template code given the way this discussion has progressed; if anyone objects do please speak up.
Happy‑
melon
23:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Could you turn the full scale on? Or at least enable template, category, disambig, redirect, and image? Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 20:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
The stub-class isn't included in the custom categories.
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|μ}}}|μ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!--
should be updated to
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|μ}}}|μ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!--
Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I think a better message would be
Same goes for the {{ physics}} template which is currently without such a message. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 13:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Per
this discussion, there was consensus (or at least no objection) to adding a {{
Bottom-importance}} rating to this template. Please could this be implemented? Once this is complete we can set up the bottom-importance category and begin to populate it. Thank you.—
RJH (
talk)
20:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I believe that
File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg is a better image for Project Astronomical Objects, and is also consistent with the image for the portal and Astronomy, being another astrophoto.
70.29.208.129 (
talk)
15:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
The current image Pleiades large.jpg has been deleted from commons. Please replace it in the template -- Raziman T V ( talk) 18:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
After deleting Category:Pages within the scope of WikiProject Physics (WP Astronomy Banner) as an empty category, TimothyRias wrote a message in my talk page that the template "is used for a legacy feature of the {{ astronomy}} template, which allows the astro=yes switch to tag articles which should also have the {{ physics}} template. This category lists the articles that use that switch (which should then be tagged and assessed.) If this seems like a roundabout way of doing things, thats because it is. But as long as that option exists on the {{ astronomy}} template, this category should exist to record its use."'.
So there are some things:
-- Magioladitis ( talk) 16:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Please write any comments in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Thanks, Magioladitis ( talk) 01:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
|astrophysics=
parameter. --
Magioladitis (
talk)
14:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC){{
editprotected}}
currently the project template can have a link to wikiproject Astronomy Objects rather than Astronomy object which necessitates a redirect i.e the actual project has a lowercase 'o'. this is a problem when using popups as it goes to the redirect page when adding a new topic [1], pls fix
Tom B (
talk)
20:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could someone change
Extended content
|
---|
*** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|¬}}}|¬ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!-- to *** CUSTOM CATEGORY CODE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND "[[Category:X articles with comments]]" *** --><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|¬}}}|¬ |{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Comments |{{#if:{{{object|}}}|[[Category:Astronomical Objects articles with comments]]}} {{#if:{{{astrophysics|}}}|[[Category:Physics articles with comments]]}} }}[[Category:{{#switch:{{lc:{{{class|}}}}} |fa|fl|ga|a|b|c|na={{uc:{{{class}}}}}-Class |start|stub|list={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{class}}}}}}}-Class |category|cat=Category-Class |template|temp=Template-Class |redirect=Redirect-Class |disambiguation|disambig|dab=Disambig-Class |image|img=Image-Class |#default=Unassessed }} Astronomy articles of {{#switch:{{lc:{{{importance|}}}}} |top|high|mid|low={{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{importance}}}}}}} |na=NA |#default=Unknown}}-importance|{{PAGENAME}}]] }}</includeonly><!-- |
Thanks. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 18:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The link to the WP:ASTRO importance ratings has gone away again. Can this be restored? I believe a separate ratings list is strongly encouraged per Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria#WikiProject importance assessments, so it is unclear why that link would be removed. Removing the link also makes my efforts to rate all the astronomy pages pointless, and so I'll stop for now. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 23:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
When the WPAstronomy template on an article is set to a "bottom" importance, the talk page is still being categorized under category:Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Unknown-importance (for a stub article) instead of category:Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Bottom-importance. Please could an Admin address that? Or is there another place I should report it? Thank you.— RJH ( talk) 20:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Since we don't have an Astronomy-specific quality scale, should the QUALITY_SCALE parameter be set back to standard for now? The current link is not very useful. Thanks.— RJH ( talk) 16:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
|ASSESSMENT_LINK=no
but then you will lose the link to the specific importance ratings. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk)
17:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I've asked a question regarding the use of the WPSpace banner here. Please reply on that talk page; thanks! :) Mlm42 ( talk) 20:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
{{edit protected}} Hello, the format of file:Nuvola mimetypes info.png is PNG. The same image exists in SVG format. Please change Nuvola mimetypes info.png to Gnome-mime-text-x-credits.svg. Nodulation ( talk) 00:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
See here for suggested changes. Bring the template in line with other banners, the extra <includeonly> tags can be omitted now, as substcheck prevents improper substitutions of itself now. qedk ( t 桜 c) 14:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
WPBannerMeta/sandbox}}
? --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
16:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Most if not all articles with the {{ WikiProject Solar System}} template will also have this template. I think it would reduce maintenance to allow the former to be incorporated into the latter via a 'solarsystem' option. It should cause a 'File:Planets2013.svg' image to be displayed in the template. The concern may be whether separate importance tables can be assembled based on whether this option is set. But it appears that is already being done for {{ WikiProject Mars}}, so a 'mars' option would also be needed. Praemonitus ( talk) 17:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
As a topic for discussion, I'd like to propose that we try setting this template's importance field as follows:
|importance={{#switch: {{lc:{{{class}}}}}
| category = na
| redirect = na
| file = na
| portal = na
| redirect = na
| template = na
| #default = {{{importance|}}}
}}
In cases where an editor does not let the template autoconfigure 'redirect' articles, setting both 'class' and 'importance', this should force the 'importance' field to 'na' as per the default. ( Here is an example.) The goal is to reduce maintenance of the selected 'class' categories. This will need testing, of course. Praemonitus ( talk) 05:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
|importance=top
/ remove it from existing templates? It's a rather trivial thing to do with AWB.
Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b}
16:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)