This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2015 April 1. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
I created this template as a way to link the various instances of anti-Muslim violence in India. Please expand on it; it is not currently exhaustive. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The recent deletions have no basis. The included incidents are not an exhaustive list of communal violence (which would be far longer) but a subset characterized by targeted violence against Muslims. In every case, there is at least one excellent source stating that such targeted violence took place (the Hashimpur massacre victims were only Muslim; hardly require there). Vanamonde93 ( talk) 21:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
While I appreciate the intent behind the additions, I think that that is a first step to ending up with a massively inflated template, just like the "violence against Hindus." The NPOV solution here is to prune that one, not massively inflate this one. I'd say that the markup in this case could even be streamlined further. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 18:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Violence against Muslims in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to include the 1948 Indian annexation of Hyderabad. RahulRamchandani ( talk) 07:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Partition related violence is different hence removed Jammu.this is about violence after independence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloudmoon ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) You are invited to define term "violence against a group" Adamgerber80 Isak.lund Rabbabodrool AppuduPappudu Bongan Vivaan65 My Lord. The definition agreed should be applied to all templates like violence against muslims or violence against hindus etc.
Options A:- A group which suffers 2/3rd of damage qualifies as victim (Pro: Numbers are easy to find & damage decides the victim. Con: A smaller group which takes direct action against a larger group may suffer 2/3rd of damage. For example, Japanese suffered very large damage in WW2 asian front. Does that mean WW2 is a violence against Japan?)
Option B:- Group which launches the 1st attack is aggressor and other group is victim. (Pro: Factual. Con: 1st attack is not easy to find. It might just be a long running saga of reprisal attacks).
Blend option A & B: Only those events which meet both criteria A & B should qualify for "violence against a group" tag. Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
I am voting for Blend of option A & B. Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2015 April 1. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
I created this template as a way to link the various instances of anti-Muslim violence in India. Please expand on it; it is not currently exhaustive. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The recent deletions have no basis. The included incidents are not an exhaustive list of communal violence (which would be far longer) but a subset characterized by targeted violence against Muslims. In every case, there is at least one excellent source stating that such targeted violence took place (the Hashimpur massacre victims were only Muslim; hardly require there). Vanamonde93 ( talk) 21:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
While I appreciate the intent behind the additions, I think that that is a first step to ending up with a massively inflated template, just like the "violence against Hindus." The NPOV solution here is to prune that one, not massively inflate this one. I'd say that the markup in this case could even be streamlined further. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 18:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Violence against Muslims in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to include the 1948 Indian annexation of Hyderabad. RahulRamchandani ( talk) 07:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Partition related violence is different hence removed Jammu.this is about violence after independence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloudmoon ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) You are invited to define term "violence against a group" Adamgerber80 Isak.lund Rabbabodrool AppuduPappudu Bongan Vivaan65 My Lord. The definition agreed should be applied to all templates like violence against muslims or violence against hindus etc.
Options A:- A group which suffers 2/3rd of damage qualifies as victim (Pro: Numbers are easy to find & damage decides the victim. Con: A smaller group which takes direct action against a larger group may suffer 2/3rd of damage. For example, Japanese suffered very large damage in WW2 asian front. Does that mean WW2 is a violence against Japan?)
Option B:- Group which launches the 1st attack is aggressor and other group is victim. (Pro: Factual. Con: 1st attack is not easy to find. It might just be a long running saga of reprisal attacks).
Blend option A & B: Only those events which meet both criteria A & B should qualify for "violence against a group" tag. Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
I am voting for Blend of option A & B. Unbiasedpov ( talk) 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)