This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Too many photos template. |
|
This page is for discussion of improvements to this template. This is not a watchlist of pages that have or need this template. |
Photography Template‑class | |||||||
|
Edit requests | ||||
|
Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup#Standardisation of template styling is a proposal for general cleanup and standardisation of ambox templates, which has been rolled out undisputed across a good many high-profile templates over the last few months. So the template should follow that layout. My preferred version is this one, although this one (with two images, and slightly different wording) is also okay.
As for the categories, it is standard for cleanup templates to be in Category:Cleanup templates, so that doesn't seem at all controversial to me. The cleanup category pages with too many photos also seems appropriate here, and as the guidelines suggest it shouldn't be depopulated prior to discussion said category's fate (if it is to be deleted, as ipatrol ( talk · contribs) apparently wishes).
Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I see no point in standarization, we don't need the Wikipedia version of ISO. I see that the way this template is and is used, it just needs a specific setup. If you want to present standarization an its reasons as arguements, go ahead. However, we need to look at those arguements on a case-by-case basis, at least until complete adoption.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 22:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Before you apply this template, please consider...
HWV258 . 09:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Should this not be expanded to include excessive use of audio samples? ― cobaltcigs 03:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Is there a smaller version of this template for sections? - Inowen ( nlfte) 23:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Template:Too much art redirects here as an alternative label, borrowing from the journalism use of the word "art" to refer to anything graphical and not text, including photos, graphics, and ads. - Inowen ( nlfte) 08:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
The template page looks like it is need of updating. Using {{tomanycharts}} is covered under the {{Too many photos}} template without mentioning any depreciation, and there's no mention of the |section parameter to change the display from "article" to "section".
—
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (
talk) 17:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Related talk Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Policy and maintenance templates on tables of statistics Moxy- 14:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Can someone please add |reason=
?
WP:TC says it's supposed to have it.
Esszet (
talk) 02:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Too many photos template. |
|
This page is for discussion of improvements to this template. This is not a watchlist of pages that have or need this template. |
Photography Template‑class | |||||||
|
Edit requests | ||||
|
Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup#Standardisation of template styling is a proposal for general cleanup and standardisation of ambox templates, which has been rolled out undisputed across a good many high-profile templates over the last few months. So the template should follow that layout. My preferred version is this one, although this one (with two images, and slightly different wording) is also okay.
As for the categories, it is standard for cleanup templates to be in Category:Cleanup templates, so that doesn't seem at all controversial to me. The cleanup category pages with too many photos also seems appropriate here, and as the guidelines suggest it shouldn't be depopulated prior to discussion said category's fate (if it is to be deleted, as ipatrol ( talk · contribs) apparently wishes).
Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I see no point in standarization, we don't need the Wikipedia version of ISO. I see that the way this template is and is used, it just needs a specific setup. If you want to present standarization an its reasons as arguements, go ahead. However, we need to look at those arguements on a case-by-case basis, at least until complete adoption.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 22:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Before you apply this template, please consider...
HWV258 . 09:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Should this not be expanded to include excessive use of audio samples? ― cobaltcigs 03:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Is there a smaller version of this template for sections? - Inowen ( nlfte) 23:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Template:Too much art redirects here as an alternative label, borrowing from the journalism use of the word "art" to refer to anything graphical and not text, including photos, graphics, and ads. - Inowen ( nlfte) 08:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
The template page looks like it is need of updating. Using {{tomanycharts}} is covered under the {{Too many photos}} template without mentioning any depreciation, and there's no mention of the |section parameter to change the display from "article" to "section".
—
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (
talk) 17:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Related talk Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Policy and maintenance templates on tables of statistics Moxy- 14:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Can someone please add |reason=
?
WP:TC says it's supposed to have it.
Esszet (
talk) 02:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)