![]() | Astronomy: Mars / Moon / Solar System / Eclipses Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Astrology NA‑class | ||||||
|
Right now this navbox seems to be an exhaustive list of solar eclipses and is getting rather big. Someone just added all the eclipses in a between 1979 and 2030 making the box gigantic and full of red. I deleted all the redlinks (because they are not helpful for navigation, which is what this box is for, right?) but that's not really the solution.
I think we need to figure out what the point of this box is, right now it's so full of links it's hard to parse. I think there are too many eclipses listed, exhaustive lists are available in the list articles, this navbox ought to have "Notable eclipses", don't you guys think? Likewise, I think there are too many centuries individually listed. Why not have a lists of solar eclipses by century and then have a link for, say 19th, 20th, 21st century eclipses? Cheers, — sligocki ( talk) 05:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
UPDATE: I've completed stub articles for events from 1950-2050, and linked here. I added Wikipedia:WikiProject_solar_eclipses to organize this work if anyone else is interested in helping. SockPuppetForTomruen ( talk) 23:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
This enormity really needs to be split. I'm not against having multiple templates under the same header, but in one template it's just too much. -- Anime Addict AA ( talk) 19:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why does the template link Solar eclipses? That makes no sense. See WP:SEAOFBLUE. I am changing. Feel free to revert. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 ( talk) 01:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 ( talk) 22:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
The template contains an error. The solar eclipse of 20 July 1944 was annular, not total, so it must belong to the section “Annular eclipses,” not “Total/hybrid eclipses.” — Jencie Nasino ( talk) 05:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
This: Solar eclipse of May 12, 1706, Hi.-- Windino Rec 20:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The "upcoming eclipse" arrow marker has not been updated yet. 130.85.226.154 ( talk) 23:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Astronomy: Mars / Moon / Solar System / Eclipses Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Astrology NA‑class | ||||||
|
Right now this navbox seems to be an exhaustive list of solar eclipses and is getting rather big. Someone just added all the eclipses in a between 1979 and 2030 making the box gigantic and full of red. I deleted all the redlinks (because they are not helpful for navigation, which is what this box is for, right?) but that's not really the solution.
I think we need to figure out what the point of this box is, right now it's so full of links it's hard to parse. I think there are too many eclipses listed, exhaustive lists are available in the list articles, this navbox ought to have "Notable eclipses", don't you guys think? Likewise, I think there are too many centuries individually listed. Why not have a lists of solar eclipses by century and then have a link for, say 19th, 20th, 21st century eclipses? Cheers, — sligocki ( talk) 05:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
UPDATE: I've completed stub articles for events from 1950-2050, and linked here. I added Wikipedia:WikiProject_solar_eclipses to organize this work if anyone else is interested in helping. SockPuppetForTomruen ( talk) 23:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
This enormity really needs to be split. I'm not against having multiple templates under the same header, but in one template it's just too much. -- Anime Addict AA ( talk) 19:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why does the template link Solar eclipses? That makes no sense. See WP:SEAOFBLUE. I am changing. Feel free to revert. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 ( talk) 01:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 ( talk) 22:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
The template contains an error. The solar eclipse of 20 July 1944 was annular, not total, so it must belong to the section “Annular eclipses,” not “Total/hybrid eclipses.” — Jencie Nasino ( talk) 05:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
This: Solar eclipse of May 12, 1706, Hi.-- Windino Rec 20:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The "upcoming eclipse" arrow marker has not been updated yet. 130.85.226.154 ( talk) 23:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)