This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rfc template. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | On 13 February 2022, it was proposed that this page be moved to Template:RfC. The result of the discussion was to be moved to Template:Request for comment. |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please adopt the sandbox version which makes this change adding a wikilink to the closing instructions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 21:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could a shortcut parameter be please added for use for large site-wide RfCs that have a dedicated shortcut? I have provided the necessary code in the sandbox. 207.161.86.162 ( talk) 04:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template. Sorry. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
14:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC){{
rfc}}
tag is removed the anchor will vanish as well. We have a number of closed RfCs which have shortcuts that are effectively permanent (see for example
WP:ENDPORTALS,
WP:MOSNUM/RFC,
WP:UP/RFC2016) and these use a normal shortcut box without problem. Second,
Legobot (
talk ·
contribs) (which maintains the lists of open RfCs) is known to choke if it encounters parameters in the {{
rfc}}
tag that it is not expecting, so please ensure that
Legoktm (
talk ·
contribs) is willing to amend the bot before implementing any additional parameters. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
14:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)The result of the move request was: to be moved to Template:Request for comment. To be moved once necessary code change is done. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 21:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:Rfc → Template:RfC – According to Wikipedia:Requests for comment, this is the correct capitalization. A redirect should be left, and the old title can be used as usual by bots, scripts, humans, etc. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 01:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Note to closer
|
---|
Since this request hasn't been closed yet, I wish to ask the closer that if they close this discussion as consensus to move. They please don't move this right away but wait until the bot's code is changed accordingly. Those two actions will probably need to be coordinated for a flawless transition. --- CX Zoom(he/him) ( let's talk| contribs) 15:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please sync with
Template:rfc/sandbox per
MOS:BLANKALT. I also removed redundant code preventing
Template:Rfc itself from being categorized because the code in question is already in <includeonly>...</includeonly>
tags. Thanks!
House
Blaster
talk
22:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I updated the sandbox to use the OOUI/Codex icons, as well as tweaked the wording. If this looks good then maybe I will open an edit request to get the icons changed. Awesome Aasim 17:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rfc template. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | On 13 February 2022, it was proposed that this page be moved to Template:RfC. The result of the discussion was to be moved to Template:Request for comment. |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please adopt the sandbox version which makes this change adding a wikilink to the closing instructions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 21:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could a shortcut parameter be please added for use for large site-wide RfCs that have a dedicated shortcut? I have provided the necessary code in the sandbox. 207.161.86.162 ( talk) 04:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template. Sorry. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
14:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC){{
rfc}}
tag is removed the anchor will vanish as well. We have a number of closed RfCs which have shortcuts that are effectively permanent (see for example
WP:ENDPORTALS,
WP:MOSNUM/RFC,
WP:UP/RFC2016) and these use a normal shortcut box without problem. Second,
Legobot (
talk ·
contribs) (which maintains the lists of open RfCs) is known to choke if it encounters parameters in the {{
rfc}}
tag that it is not expecting, so please ensure that
Legoktm (
talk ·
contribs) is willing to amend the bot before implementing any additional parameters. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
14:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)The result of the move request was: to be moved to Template:Request for comment. To be moved once necessary code change is done. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 21:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:Rfc → Template:RfC – According to Wikipedia:Requests for comment, this is the correct capitalization. A redirect should be left, and the old title can be used as usual by bots, scripts, humans, etc. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 01:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Note to closer
|
---|
Since this request hasn't been closed yet, I wish to ask the closer that if they close this discussion as consensus to move. They please don't move this right away but wait until the bot's code is changed accordingly. Those two actions will probably need to be coordinated for a flawless transition. --- CX Zoom(he/him) ( let's talk| contribs) 15:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please sync with
Template:rfc/sandbox per
MOS:BLANKALT. I also removed redundant code preventing
Template:Rfc itself from being categorized because the code in question is already in <includeonly>...</includeonly>
tags. Thanks!
House
Blaster
talk
22:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I updated the sandbox to use the OOUI/Codex icons, as well as tweaked the wording. If this looks good then maybe I will open an edit request to get the icons changed. Awesome Aasim 17:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)