| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
R from gendered term template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 1 May 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved from Template:R from gender to Template:R from gendered term. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The Category:Printworthy redirects has been added to this Rcat. The WikiProject Redirect/Style guide has taken on the goal of categorizing all redirects either as Printworthy or Unprintworthy. These gender-type redirects are candidates for the Printworthy cat. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 09:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Ran into a small problem. There are some gender redirects that are also unprintworthy plurals, such as Ball girls. With my first edit, this added such redirects to both the Printworthy and the Unprintworthy cats. I fixed that with some code that allows the choice by adding "unprintworthy" to the Rcat, like this...
{{R from gender|unprintworthy}}
I will add a /doc page to explain this, and I will add the "unprintworthy" choice to all of the existing unprintworthy gender plurals. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 10:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Done –
Paine Ellsworth (
CLIMAX ) 12:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky ( talk) 20:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Template:R from gender → Template:R from gendered term – The current title, {{ R from gender}}, was a little confusing to me - at first, the name suggested to me that this template might be for categorizing redirects from the name of a gender identity. I propose moving it to the more specific title {{ R from gendered term}}, in order to clarify the purpose of this redirect template and remove the potential ambiguity. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 09:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
-
Note: A parallel CfR discussion is ongoing at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 1 § Category:Redirects from gender. —
a smart kitten[
meow 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC) -
Note: Notified
WikiProject Redirect of this discussion. All the best, —
a smart kitten[
meow 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this makes it a lot clearer. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this wording makes more sense. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Good idea for clarity and precision! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
R from gendered term template. |
|
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 1 May 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved from Template:R from gender to Template:R from gendered term. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The Category:Printworthy redirects has been added to this Rcat. The WikiProject Redirect/Style guide has taken on the goal of categorizing all redirects either as Printworthy or Unprintworthy. These gender-type redirects are candidates for the Printworthy cat. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 09:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Ran into a small problem. There are some gender redirects that are also unprintworthy plurals, such as Ball girls. With my first edit, this added such redirects to both the Printworthy and the Unprintworthy cats. I fixed that with some code that allows the choice by adding "unprintworthy" to the Rcat, like this...
{{R from gender|unprintworthy}}
I will add a /doc page to explain this, and I will add the "unprintworthy" choice to all of the existing unprintworthy gender plurals. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 10:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Done –
Paine Ellsworth (
CLIMAX ) 12:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky ( talk) 20:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Template:R from gender → Template:R from gendered term – The current title, {{ R from gender}}, was a little confusing to me - at first, the name suggested to me that this template might be for categorizing redirects from the name of a gender identity. I propose moving it to the more specific title {{ R from gendered term}}, in order to clarify the purpose of this redirect template and remove the potential ambiguity. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 09:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
-
Note: A parallel CfR discussion is ongoing at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 1 § Category:Redirects from gender. —
a smart kitten[
meow 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
-
Note: Notified
WikiProject Redirect of this discussion. All the best, —
a smart kitten[
meow 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this makes it a lot clearer. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this wording makes more sense. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Good idea for clarity and precision! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)