![]() |
Template:Pp-usertalk is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
{{editprotected}}
This template, as it is, is basically a laundry list of ways to disrupt Wikipedia and make this sort of protection needed. Can we just replace the whole list with "making disruptive edits" or similar? Gracenotes T § 01:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
The category associated with this template is for both user and user talk pages (there is no pp-user template). I would like to reword the template message to something like this:
This page associated with Example ( talk · contribs · block log · arb · rfcu · ssp · SPI confirmed suspected) has been protected from editing ( protection log). If you wish to edit it, please ask an administrator to do so on your behalf, or request unprotection.
Even better, a namespace conditional could be used to decide whether it's a user page or talk page. Look at the source to see the conditional. Thoughts?
CMummert ·
talk
14:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The statement "If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired." is misleading at best, and plain wrong at worst, IMO. Just because someone goes to a protected user page for the purpose of issuing a new message, doesn't mean the block has expired. Dansiman ( talk| Contribs) 08:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The superscript looks weird, would normal or small text be better?......
Dendodge ..
Talk
Help
17:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I'm trying to understand this template. If a user abuses their own talk page, can't they be blocked from editing it as a block option without the need to protect the talk page? -- Bsherr ( talk) 16:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Go to
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#WP:Accessability ~~
EBE123~~
talk
Contribs
22:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change:
|small={{{small|}}} |demospace={{{demospace|}}}
To:
|small={{{small|}}} |right={{{right|}}} |demospace={{{demospace|}}}
This allows use of the new pp-meta parameter. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've created a version in the sandbox which will work for both semi and full protection (also see this). Would a template editor/admin please check the code and copy it over. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 09:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Usertalk-sprotect has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This redirect needs an Rcat (redirect category template) added. Please modify it as follows:
#REDIRECT [[Template:pp-semi-usertalk]] [[Category:Protection templates]]
#REDIRECT [[Template:Pp-usertalk]] {{Redr|fully protected}} [[Category:Protection templates]]
This will defeat a double redirect (Template:Pp-semi-usertalk also redirects to Template:Pp-usertalk) and update the category populations. Template {{ Redr}} is a shortcut for the {{ This is a redirect}} template, which is itself a shortcut used to add categories to redirects. Thank you in advance! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm not sure which part of the code the problem lies, but the second template (the one for semi-protected) has a redundant request unprotection link at the end. Could someone fix it? Pizza1016 ( talk | contribs | uploads | logs) 10:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Template:Pp-usertalk is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
{{editprotected}}
This template, as it is, is basically a laundry list of ways to disrupt Wikipedia and make this sort of protection needed. Can we just replace the whole list with "making disruptive edits" or similar? Gracenotes T § 01:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
The category associated with this template is for both user and user talk pages (there is no pp-user template). I would like to reword the template message to something like this:
This page associated with Example ( talk · contribs · block log · arb · rfcu · ssp · SPI confirmed suspected) has been protected from editing ( protection log). If you wish to edit it, please ask an administrator to do so on your behalf, or request unprotection.
Even better, a namespace conditional could be used to decide whether it's a user page or talk page. Look at the source to see the conditional. Thoughts?
CMummert ·
talk
14:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The statement "If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired." is misleading at best, and plain wrong at worst, IMO. Just because someone goes to a protected user page for the purpose of issuing a new message, doesn't mean the block has expired. Dansiman ( talk| Contribs) 08:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
The superscript looks weird, would normal or small text be better?......
Dendodge ..
Talk
Help
17:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I'm trying to understand this template. If a user abuses their own talk page, can't they be blocked from editing it as a block option without the need to protect the talk page? -- Bsherr ( talk) 16:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Go to
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#WP:Accessability ~~
EBE123~~
talk
Contribs
22:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change:
|small={{{small|}}} |demospace={{{demospace|}}}
To:
|small={{{small|}}} |right={{{right|}}} |demospace={{{demospace|}}}
This allows use of the new pp-meta parameter. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've created a version in the sandbox which will work for both semi and full protection (also see this). Would a template editor/admin please check the code and copy it over. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 09:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Usertalk-sprotect has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This redirect needs an Rcat (redirect category template) added. Please modify it as follows:
#REDIRECT [[Template:pp-semi-usertalk]] [[Category:Protection templates]]
#REDIRECT [[Template:Pp-usertalk]] {{Redr|fully protected}} [[Category:Protection templates]]
This will defeat a double redirect (Template:Pp-semi-usertalk also redirects to Template:Pp-usertalk) and update the category populations. Template {{ Redr}} is a shortcut for the {{ This is a redirect}} template, which is itself a shortcut used to add categories to redirects. Thank you in advance! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm not sure which part of the code the problem lies, but the second template (the one for semi-protected) has a redundant request unprotection link at the end. Could someone fix it? Pizza1016 ( talk | contribs | uploads | logs) 10:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)