Template:Party shading/Democratic is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Politics: American Template‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
-- see Oregon State Senate. Are you guys sure you reverted to the proper version? - Pete ( talk) 20:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could an administrator please put the protected icon in this recently protected template within <noinclude>
tags? --
Millbrooky (
talk) 20:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} Please add iw sv:Mall:Party shading/Democratic. Vints ( talk) 19:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could someone change the category to
Category:United States Democratic Party color templates. The old category spelled "colour" is depreciated. Thanks.
DCmacnut
<> 20:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like the color code for this template to be reverted to its previous color #B0CEFF. While the new color is the exact color presently used by the party in their logos and materials, it plays very poorly when in use. The color is much darker than the previous, and with dark blue or black text behind it, it makes those things which it highlights very difficult to read. Only a white text on the new background is easy to read. Reverting it back to the light blue color, above mentioned, will restore coding which has been used for a long while, a color which works. Spartan7W § 16:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Spartan7W § 16:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Reset to "no" because the question of shading is different than that of the meta color. The difference is jarring compared to the original and it simply doesn't flow. Nevermore27 ( talk) 01:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Minority |
|
---|
Compared to:
Minority |
|
---|
The current shading is just bad. Nevermore27 ( talk) 02:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
This template, and Party shading/Republican too, don't display on the presidential results tables which are shown on pretty much every US county article, but they used to. I can't figure out any reason for this. Thoughts on how to fix it? MB298 ( talk) 23:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Party shading/Democratic,
Template:Party shading/Independent (US),
Template:Party shading/Republican and
Template:Party shading/Independent has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change background:<color> to background-color:<color> in all these templates: This is to fix wikitable sortable. Tholme ( talk) 23:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Whoever just changed the hex code made all hyperlinks virtually unreadable. Please revert to previous hex code. Svenskbygderna ( talk) 18:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
This template is often used with text that contains blue links, but it currently does not provide enough contrast to the blue links as defined in the manual of style for accessibility, as the new default Vector 2022 skin uses a lighter link color than the previous default skin. I would like to propose changing the color as follows:
Color code | Link contrast ratio | WCAG level | Sample | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Current color | B0CEFF | 3.35 | A | Democratic |
Proposed new color | DCEEFF | 4.52 | AA | Democratic |
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 19:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Template:Party shading/Democratic is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Politics: American Template‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
-- see Oregon State Senate. Are you guys sure you reverted to the proper version? - Pete ( talk) 20:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could an administrator please put the protected icon in this recently protected template within <noinclude>
tags? --
Millbrooky (
talk) 20:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} Please add iw sv:Mall:Party shading/Democratic. Vints ( talk) 19:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could someone change the category to
Category:United States Democratic Party color templates. The old category spelled "colour" is depreciated. Thanks.
DCmacnut
<> 20:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like the color code for this template to be reverted to its previous color #B0CEFF. While the new color is the exact color presently used by the party in their logos and materials, it plays very poorly when in use. The color is much darker than the previous, and with dark blue or black text behind it, it makes those things which it highlights very difficult to read. Only a white text on the new background is easy to read. Reverting it back to the light blue color, above mentioned, will restore coding which has been used for a long while, a color which works. Spartan7W § 16:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Spartan7W § 16:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Reset to "no" because the question of shading is different than that of the meta color. The difference is jarring compared to the original and it simply doesn't flow. Nevermore27 ( talk) 01:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Minority |
|
---|
Compared to:
Minority |
|
---|
The current shading is just bad. Nevermore27 ( talk) 02:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
This template, and Party shading/Republican too, don't display on the presidential results tables which are shown on pretty much every US county article, but they used to. I can't figure out any reason for this. Thoughts on how to fix it? MB298 ( talk) 23:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Party shading/Democratic,
Template:Party shading/Independent (US),
Template:Party shading/Republican and
Template:Party shading/Independent has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change background:<color> to background-color:<color> in all these templates: This is to fix wikitable sortable. Tholme ( talk) 23:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Whoever just changed the hex code made all hyperlinks virtually unreadable. Please revert to previous hex code. Svenskbygderna ( talk) 18:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
This template is often used with text that contains blue links, but it currently does not provide enough contrast to the blue links as defined in the manual of style for accessibility, as the new default Vector 2022 skin uses a lighter link color than the previous default skin. I would like to propose changing the color as follows:
Color code | Link contrast ratio | WCAG level | Sample | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Current color | B0CEFF | 3.35 | A | Democratic |
Proposed new color | DCEEFF | 4.52 | AA | Democratic |
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 19:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)