The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Overwatch → Template:Overwatch (video game) – The video game isn't the only topic on Overwatch. The template should be moved accordingly. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 09:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
I was wondering why this Blizzard title specifically is listed, seeing asits article doesn't have the template andit doesn't seem any more related to this IP than other Blizzard games. Am I missing something? ~ Mable ( chat) 09:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
the WC thing being "more important" is 100% subjective, it was moved due to it occurring before the OL, as chronological order is preferred when it exists
@ Dissident93, where is the consensus that chronological order is preferred in navboxes? The OWL being "more important" than the WC is not subjective at all. The OWL has its own navbox with twelve child articles and endless sources. The WC was small potatoes in comparison, less than a fourth of the viewership and a fraction of the coverage, not to mention a fraction of the money. czar 03:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I reckon that Seagull should be removed from this category in the template, as he is retired from the Dallas Fuel and is a full-time streamer, not an Overwatch Esports player. Would be happy to make the change if this seems alright. - OliverEastwood ( talk) 06:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Overwatch → Template:Overwatch (video game) – The video game isn't the only topic on Overwatch. The template should be moved accordingly. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 09:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
I was wondering why this Blizzard title specifically is listed, seeing asits article doesn't have the template andit doesn't seem any more related to this IP than other Blizzard games. Am I missing something? ~ Mable ( chat) 09:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
the WC thing being "more important" is 100% subjective, it was moved due to it occurring before the OL, as chronological order is preferred when it exists
@ Dissident93, where is the consensus that chronological order is preferred in navboxes? The OWL being "more important" than the WC is not subjective at all. The OWL has its own navbox with twelve child articles and endless sources. The WC was small potatoes in comparison, less than a fourth of the viewership and a fraction of the coverage, not to mention a fraction of the money. czar 03:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I reckon that Seagull should be removed from this category in the template, as he is retired from the Dallas Fuel and is a full-time streamer, not an Overwatch Esports player. Would be happy to make the change if this seems alright. - OliverEastwood ( talk) 06:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)