This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Old XfD multi template. |
|
Template:Old XfD multi is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This template was nominated for
deletion or considered for
merging. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change collapsible collapsed
to mw-collapsible mw-collapsed
, which is loaded faster and not deprecated. —
TheDJ (
talk •
contribs) 14:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please copy
Module:Old XfD multi/sandbox to
Module:Old XfD multi. The changes add support for a |deletion=
parameter, which replaces the word deletion in the top line of the box.
Danski454 (
talk) 00:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I believe that the template wiki link should be changed from "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." to "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." The phrase, 'nominated for deletion' refers closer to the process than simply 'deletion'. 'deletion' has ambiguity, because it could link to the XfD discussion or the actual process. This change wouldn't inhibit usability and would increase clarity. (See also MOS:LINKCLARITY, MOS:EASTEREGG) — Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 12:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
For the specific description: X to Y Line 368:
'This %s was nominated for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]] or considered for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging|merging]].',
to
'This %s was [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|nominated for deletion]] or considered for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging|merging]].',
Line 375, 380, 386 from
'This %s was previously nominated for deletion.',
to
'This %s was previously nominated for deletion.',
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I am not an expert on Lua, but I would like to request adding the words "multiple times." after "This <type of page> was nominated for deletion". Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 11:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
I've occasionally seen this put on articles rather than their talk pages. It could be worth it to use {{ talk other}} to automatically put the page in Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace when that happens. jlwoodwa ( talk) 18:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Old XfD multi template. |
|
Template:Old XfD multi is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This template was nominated for
deletion or considered for
merging. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change collapsible collapsed
to mw-collapsible mw-collapsed
, which is loaded faster and not deprecated. —
TheDJ (
talk •
contribs) 14:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please copy
Module:Old XfD multi/sandbox to
Module:Old XfD multi. The changes add support for a |deletion=
parameter, which replaces the word deletion in the top line of the box.
Danski454 (
talk) 00:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:Old XfD multi has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I believe that the template wiki link should be changed from "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." to "This template was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep." The phrase, 'nominated for deletion' refers closer to the process than simply 'deletion'. 'deletion' has ambiguity, because it could link to the XfD discussion or the actual process. This change wouldn't inhibit usability and would increase clarity. (See also MOS:LINKCLARITY, MOS:EASTEREGG) — Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 12:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
For the specific description: X to Y Line 368:
'This %s was nominated for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]] or considered for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging|merging]].',
to
'This %s was [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|nominated for deletion]] or considered for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging|merging]].',
Line 375, 380, 386 from
'This %s was previously nominated for deletion.',
to
'This %s was previously nominated for deletion.',
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I am not an expert on Lua, but I would like to request adding the words "multiple times." after "This <type of page> was nominated for deletion". Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 11:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
I've occasionally seen this put on articles rather than their talk pages. It could be worth it to use {{ talk other}} to automatically put the page in Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace when that happens. jlwoodwa ( talk) 18:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)