This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
A conversation has been started at Template talk:Unreferenced#Is it time to add an icon? to consider adding an icon to the {{ unreferenced}} family of templates, including this template. Jeepday ( talk) 13:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
See Template talk:Refimprove#Reference density.-- Kozuch ( talk) 13:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
The opening sentence of the tag refers to this section but the blue link on the lower line says "this article". I do not know how to edit templates yet. Apologies for cross-posting this on two talk pages. Thanks in advance to anyone who can fix this. EatYerGreens ( talk) 10:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree. It should say 'Please help improve this section...', not 'Please help improve this article...'. 86.29.64.45 ( talk) 13:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
I feel the template is too bold on the page, which makes me want to avoid using it. Something more discreet might be less distressing to the original editor who wrote unreferenced material, and less likely to to convince a reader that the section is useless. Here's a possible redesign:
How about it? Easchiff( talk) 09:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
There's no need for this to be maintained separately from {{ refimprove}}. Requesting sync with the new sandbox to unify this with the parent template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
In the last years the opposite philosophy was used. We have section specific templates for many occations. For example {{ Unreferenced section}}. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
The template {{
Refimprove}} allows a |talk=
parameter, so this also needs to be passed across. I have modified the sandbox version ready for deployment (and updated the doc and testcases). This is a non-controversial change, so I will request deployment in a day or two.
HairyWombat 19:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
{{ Editprotected}} Later. Please deploy the version in the sandbox. The modification is non-controversial. HairyWombat 17:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
This section needs expansion. You can help by
adding to it. |
Is there any support among editors watching this talk page for making this template smaller, i.e. following the example of the form factor used with {{ Expand section}} (as seen above)? I think it makes a lot of sense. 67.101.6.85 ( talk) 00:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus( talk) 02:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ref improve section →
Template:Refimprove section – Consistency. This template calls {{
Refimprove}}, it's essentially just a redirect to that template (see
TfD discussion) and renaming to {{
Refimprove section}}, which currently redirects here, provides consistency with the main template. This is really a minor move and would have no detrimental effects on the template or any articles using it. --
AussieLegend (
talk) 05:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
I've requested a fix for some layout problems at Template talk:Refimprove#Poor layout. - 84user ( talk) 14:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Please edit this template to make it consistent with all other section and article templates. Specifically, make it centered, full height, full width, and with a font size consistent with e.g. refimprove (and virtually everything else). -- JAC4 ( talk) 20:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the template at this time, per the discussion below. Moving would increase consistency, but with the redirect created and this not being an outward-facing part of the encyclopedia, it seems that there is little support for making the change at this time. Dekimasu よ! 02:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Refimprove section → Template:More citations needed section – Per move of main template {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 19:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
A conversation has been started at Template talk:Unreferenced#Is it time to add an icon? to consider adding an icon to the {{ unreferenced}} family of templates, including this template. Jeepday ( talk) 13:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
See Template talk:Refimprove#Reference density.-- Kozuch ( talk) 13:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
The opening sentence of the tag refers to this section but the blue link on the lower line says "this article". I do not know how to edit templates yet. Apologies for cross-posting this on two talk pages. Thanks in advance to anyone who can fix this. EatYerGreens ( talk) 10:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree. It should say 'Please help improve this section...', not 'Please help improve this article...'. 86.29.64.45 ( talk) 13:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
I feel the template is too bold on the page, which makes me want to avoid using it. Something more discreet might be less distressing to the original editor who wrote unreferenced material, and less likely to to convince a reader that the section is useless. Here's a possible redesign:
How about it? Easchiff( talk) 09:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
There's no need for this to be maintained separately from {{ refimprove}}. Requesting sync with the new sandbox to unify this with the parent template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
In the last years the opposite philosophy was used. We have section specific templates for many occations. For example {{ Unreferenced section}}. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
The template {{
Refimprove}} allows a |talk=
parameter, so this also needs to be passed across. I have modified the sandbox version ready for deployment (and updated the doc and testcases). This is a non-controversial change, so I will request deployment in a day or two.
HairyWombat 19:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
{{ Editprotected}} Later. Please deploy the version in the sandbox. The modification is non-controversial. HairyWombat 17:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
This section needs expansion. You can help by
adding to it. |
Is there any support among editors watching this talk page for making this template smaller, i.e. following the example of the form factor used with {{ Expand section}} (as seen above)? I think it makes a lot of sense. 67.101.6.85 ( talk) 00:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus( talk) 02:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ref improve section →
Template:Refimprove section – Consistency. This template calls {{
Refimprove}}, it's essentially just a redirect to that template (see
TfD discussion) and renaming to {{
Refimprove section}}, which currently redirects here, provides consistency with the main template. This is really a minor move and would have no detrimental effects on the template or any articles using it. --
AussieLegend (
talk) 05:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
I've requested a fix for some layout problems at Template talk:Refimprove#Poor layout. - 84user ( talk) 14:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Please edit this template to make it consistent with all other section and article templates. Specifically, make it centered, full height, full width, and with a font size consistent with e.g. refimprove (and virtually everything else). -- JAC4 ( talk) 20:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the template at this time, per the discussion below. Moving would increase consistency, but with the redirect created and this not being an outward-facing part of the encyclopedia, it seems that there is little support for making the change at this time. Dekimasu よ! 02:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Refimprove section → Template:More citations needed section – Per move of main template {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 19:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)