![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Anyone wonder why User:CapitalR decided to change it to the other template. SpecialWindler talk 21:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Neither OK Connery nor From Hong Kong with Love were Bond films. They were neither marketed as such nor were that ever considered in any way part of the series, official or not. They should not be listed here so I have removed them. 23skidoo 20:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I've no preference either way, but the article on the film series uses the header "Unofficial films" so unless it changes, it might be worth considering changing the header in the template to be consistent ... or seeking consensus at the films article to change that header to be consistent with the one used here. 23skidoo ( talk) 21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted an anon IP's edit that spli the EON films section into a "reboot series" section for Casino Royale. This is meaningless, as every time a new actor has been cast the series has technically rebooted, particularly with regards to Dalton and Brosnan (especially Brosnan). I see no need for such a division to be made with regards to the EON films. 23skidoo ( talk) 23:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked new and unregistered IP useers from editing this template for the time being, since obviously the anonymous editor isn't getting the message or isn't reading the edit summaries explaining why his/her edit regarding Quantum of Solace is being reverted. I recommend leaving the block up for at least 7 days from the time-stamp of this message; after that if any admin wants to unblock, please feel free. 23skidoo ( talk) 21:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Couldn't it be "James Bond films and actors"? The 'the' doesn't look or sound right to me. — Jonathan D. Parshall ( Talk | contribs) 10:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
The current organization has only two groups with 22 items in a single group. I would leave the Non-EON films alone but organize the the EON films either by the actor portraying Bond (the general public groups the films by actor) or by decade (as is done with navboxes for directors, e.g. Template:Stanley Kubrick). This can either be done with subgroups (all under the current "Official films (EON Productions)" group) or with normal groups. Please respond by saying if you Agree or Disagree with reorganizing the template in general and how you feel this could best be done.-- Marcus Brute ( talk) 04:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
As the Eon actors are broken down into their own row, should the same not also be done for the non-Eon ones, for the sake of clarity if nothing else? - SchroCat ( ^ • @) 08:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
I would like to see Casino Royale (Climax!) 1954 added to the beginning of the list as the first screen appearance of James Bond. I am aware of the debate whether a 1 hour made-for-tv movie presented in a television Anthology ought to be considered a Bond film—yet consider the fact that it was the first screen appearance of the character, preceding Dr. No by eight years, and the fact that the non-Eon films (1967, 1983) were a spoof and a satire, so it should fit in. I am only proposing a complete listing. What do you think? -- Espresso-con-pana ( talk) 16:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
{{James Bond film crew}}
Is there room for a ninth navbox with only a minor variant in detail? - SchroCat ( talk) 07:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the non eon bond films list.....you are missing David Niven tab with Casino Royale (1954) I think that oughta be included
74.78.129.37 ( talk) 02:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Anyone wonder why User:CapitalR decided to change it to the other template. SpecialWindler talk 21:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Neither OK Connery nor From Hong Kong with Love were Bond films. They were neither marketed as such nor were that ever considered in any way part of the series, official or not. They should not be listed here so I have removed them. 23skidoo 20:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I've no preference either way, but the article on the film series uses the header "Unofficial films" so unless it changes, it might be worth considering changing the header in the template to be consistent ... or seeking consensus at the films article to change that header to be consistent with the one used here. 23skidoo ( talk) 21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted an anon IP's edit that spli the EON films section into a "reboot series" section for Casino Royale. This is meaningless, as every time a new actor has been cast the series has technically rebooted, particularly with regards to Dalton and Brosnan (especially Brosnan). I see no need for such a division to be made with regards to the EON films. 23skidoo ( talk) 23:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked new and unregistered IP useers from editing this template for the time being, since obviously the anonymous editor isn't getting the message or isn't reading the edit summaries explaining why his/her edit regarding Quantum of Solace is being reverted. I recommend leaving the block up for at least 7 days from the time-stamp of this message; after that if any admin wants to unblock, please feel free. 23skidoo ( talk) 21:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Couldn't it be "James Bond films and actors"? The 'the' doesn't look or sound right to me. — Jonathan D. Parshall ( Talk | contribs) 10:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
The current organization has only two groups with 22 items in a single group. I would leave the Non-EON films alone but organize the the EON films either by the actor portraying Bond (the general public groups the films by actor) or by decade (as is done with navboxes for directors, e.g. Template:Stanley Kubrick). This can either be done with subgroups (all under the current "Official films (EON Productions)" group) or with normal groups. Please respond by saying if you Agree or Disagree with reorganizing the template in general and how you feel this could best be done.-- Marcus Brute ( talk) 04:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
As the Eon actors are broken down into their own row, should the same not also be done for the non-Eon ones, for the sake of clarity if nothing else? - SchroCat ( ^ • @) 08:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
I would like to see Casino Royale (Climax!) 1954 added to the beginning of the list as the first screen appearance of James Bond. I am aware of the debate whether a 1 hour made-for-tv movie presented in a television Anthology ought to be considered a Bond film—yet consider the fact that it was the first screen appearance of the character, preceding Dr. No by eight years, and the fact that the non-Eon films (1967, 1983) were a spoof and a satire, so it should fit in. I am only proposing a complete listing. What do you think? -- Espresso-con-pana ( talk) 16:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
{{James Bond film crew}}
Is there room for a ninth navbox with only a minor variant in detail? - SchroCat ( talk) 07:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the non eon bond films list.....you are missing David Niven tab with Casino Royale (1954) I think that oughta be included
74.78.129.37 ( talk) 02:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)