This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
{{Infobox monarch | name = | title = | image = | caption = | reign = | coronation = | investiture = | full name = | birth_name = | native_lang1 = | native_lang1_name1 = | native_lang2 = | native_lang2_name1 = | othertitles = | baptism = | birth_date = | birth_place = | death_date = | death_place = | burial_date = | burial_place = | predecessor = | suc-type = | heir = | successor = | queen = | consort = | consortreign = | consortto = | spouse = | spouse 1 = | spouse 2 = | issue = | royal house = | dynasty = | royal anthem = | royal motto = | father = | mother = | religion = | signature = }}
I would like to see this template used on all the British monarch pages. Currently, the House of Tutor and afterwards have those "British Royalty" templates which are about the House rather than the specific monarch. -- JW1805 17:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
I've added some colour to the template - mostly to fall in with WP:BRoy. However, this template will slowly be replaced by Template:Infobox British Royalty -- D B D 23:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please add an interwiki-link to the Dutch version of this template? This is a link:
Sjabloon:Monarch.
Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr
16:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I wonder if it might be helpful to have the template automatically insert the length of the monarch's reign next to the dates of his or her reign (just as some of the other templates for people automatically insert the person's age).-- Tabun1015 02:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Could it be made so that "Birthplace" appears if a place of birth is specified but a date of birth isn't, for monarchs where the date of birth is unknown? Currently the contents of the "place of birth" field are preceded by a blank space, with the expectation that "Born" and the date of birth will be above it. -- Ptcamn 08:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm trying to generate a list of places of burial for all English monarchs. Is there a way to manipulate the data contained in the articles using this infobox to generate such a list? At the moment, I don't see a parameter for country, so I'm not sure how different countries can be separated out. Carcharoth 15:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I've got a question concerning the edit-sections using this template. On nl.Wikipedia.org we've got a similar template but the edit-sections in an article next to the template are apearing under the template (example: nl:Constantijn de Grote). How did you solve this problem? Evil berry 11:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
A section should be included for children of the monarch too (See
Abdullah of Saudi Arabia).
thestick
00:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I have a problem with these entries. First, the title of "queen". It is not needed, consort alone suffices as this is a monarch infobox, for use by monarchs and there spouses. Also, for the section of spouses, it shows up as "wives". It should be gender neutral and just say "Spouse(s)". Thirdly, the section for consort should have more entries in it. Holy Roman Emperor Francis II had four wives, three of whom were consorts to him as emperor. In summary, we only need "consort" and "spouse" entries, with some more spaces for consorts and get rid of the queen entry since it really is not needed. Charles 19:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I was going to change the colour from the generic light blue to "plum", to symbolise the royal "purple". However I found the purple to be a bit too dark. But I thought it better to ask here first how the reception is. I tried it once, it looks pretty good, I hope I can get your support...? Gryffindor 00:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The use of the term "issue" is archaic jargon and a disservice to the readership. I propose changing it to "Offspring", or if that is unsuitable for some reason, "Progeny". 76.254.79.159 ( talk) 16:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I would like to draw people's attention to discussion on Template talk:Infobox Buddhist biography.
This information box is being used on each of the articles on the Dalai lamas as well as other lamas, it's usage is variable and three boxes now exist which could be used. I've made a suggestion there which I think will fix this and expand that template's usage. Thanks.-- Alf melmac 21:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I need the original HTML script for creating this infobox template. This is because I am trying to build a similar template in Sanskrit Wikipedia. So the HTML script of this template would be useful. -- Johnxxx9 ( talk) 15:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was not done. Skomorokh 11:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Infobox monarch → Template:Infobox constitutional monarch — This requested move is in lieu of a deletion proposal. I do not think this template should be implemented universally for all "monarchs". In fact, I would like to delete it from a great many pages on pre-modern monarchs. Perhaps it would be best deleted from all article, but I don't care about modern monarchs enough to look into it. So, I propose a re-purposing of this template, specifically a restriction on its use, indicated by the renaming. Here are the reasons:
— Srnec ( talk) 18:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
What's up with the "heir" field? It just floats there, for no apparent reason, between predecessor and successor, and has no label, so readers aren't going to know what it is. PS: Isn't there some other term to use than "predecessor"? That word actually means "one who died before" so it is not an accurate term to use in all cases (e.g., abdications, no-fatal usurpings, etc.) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 20:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
It's so dark it makes blue links quite hard to read, see e.g. Genghis Khan. I think people with some flavour of colour-blindness (as well as people printing it down in black and white) might be unable to read them at all. ― A. di M. plé dréachtaí 09:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
{{ Infobox monarch}} | {{ Infobox monarch/sandbox}} | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Hello,
Suggesting 'Issue' to replace 'Offspring', per Template:Infobox royalty wordings.
Thanks.इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 09:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Can someone please tell me what the difference is between "offspring" and "children" and why we need two separate categories in the box to cover this information? -- Folantin ( talk) 08:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
At some point issue was renamed children. Of course, all the articles that use "issue" now don't display children. StarryGrandma ( talk) 21:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
data8 = {{{birth_name<includeonly>|{{{birth name|}}}</includeonly>}}}
data33 = {{{issue<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}} {{{offspring<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}}
First, there are 2535 articles which use this template. After the change from "issue" to "children" most of those infoboxes no longer display the children. Any change has to be backward compatible and preserve what is already out there. So that we can see the children again in the infoboxes on those pages I am changing back, but keeping "children" as an alternative so we don't lose anything with that field.
List of articles using Template:Infobox monarch
Second, "issue" is the standard British English in formal lists of children of royalty. See Template:Infobox royalty and Template:Infobox noble. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National_varieties of English we don't edit articles to change from one variety of English to another. For example, an article that starts out using the spelling colour should not be edited to change it to the American version, color.
StarryGrandma ( talk) 01:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
All these unique fields better be added Template:Infobox royalty. -- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 06:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
When this template appears in articles, the merge notice says "See templates for discussion" and links to the non-existent section: 2013_July_13#template:Infobox_monarch. It should link to 2013_July_13#template:Infobox_royalty. Nurg ( talk) 05:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Infobox monarchy which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 17:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
{{Infobox monarch | name = | title = | image = | caption = | reign = | coronation = | investiture = | full name = | birth_name = | native_lang1 = | native_lang1_name1 = | native_lang2 = | native_lang2_name1 = | othertitles = | baptism = | birth_date = | birth_place = | death_date = | death_place = | burial_date = | burial_place = | predecessor = | suc-type = | heir = | successor = | queen = | consort = | consortreign = | consortto = | spouse = | spouse 1 = | spouse 2 = | issue = | royal house = | dynasty = | royal anthem = | royal motto = | father = | mother = | religion = | signature = }}
I would like to see this template used on all the British monarch pages. Currently, the House of Tutor and afterwards have those "British Royalty" templates which are about the House rather than the specific monarch. -- JW1805 17:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
I've added some colour to the template - mostly to fall in with WP:BRoy. However, this template will slowly be replaced by Template:Infobox British Royalty -- D B D 23:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please add an interwiki-link to the Dutch version of this template? This is a link:
Sjabloon:Monarch.
Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr
16:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I wonder if it might be helpful to have the template automatically insert the length of the monarch's reign next to the dates of his or her reign (just as some of the other templates for people automatically insert the person's age).-- Tabun1015 02:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Could it be made so that "Birthplace" appears if a place of birth is specified but a date of birth isn't, for monarchs where the date of birth is unknown? Currently the contents of the "place of birth" field are preceded by a blank space, with the expectation that "Born" and the date of birth will be above it. -- Ptcamn 08:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm trying to generate a list of places of burial for all English monarchs. Is there a way to manipulate the data contained in the articles using this infobox to generate such a list? At the moment, I don't see a parameter for country, so I'm not sure how different countries can be separated out. Carcharoth 15:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I've got a question concerning the edit-sections using this template. On nl.Wikipedia.org we've got a similar template but the edit-sections in an article next to the template are apearing under the template (example: nl:Constantijn de Grote). How did you solve this problem? Evil berry 11:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
A section should be included for children of the monarch too (See
Abdullah of Saudi Arabia).
thestick
00:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I have a problem with these entries. First, the title of "queen". It is not needed, consort alone suffices as this is a monarch infobox, for use by monarchs and there spouses. Also, for the section of spouses, it shows up as "wives". It should be gender neutral and just say "Spouse(s)". Thirdly, the section for consort should have more entries in it. Holy Roman Emperor Francis II had four wives, three of whom were consorts to him as emperor. In summary, we only need "consort" and "spouse" entries, with some more spaces for consorts and get rid of the queen entry since it really is not needed. Charles 19:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I was going to change the colour from the generic light blue to "plum", to symbolise the royal "purple". However I found the purple to be a bit too dark. But I thought it better to ask here first how the reception is. I tried it once, it looks pretty good, I hope I can get your support...? Gryffindor 00:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The use of the term "issue" is archaic jargon and a disservice to the readership. I propose changing it to "Offspring", or if that is unsuitable for some reason, "Progeny". 76.254.79.159 ( talk) 16:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I would like to draw people's attention to discussion on Template talk:Infobox Buddhist biography.
This information box is being used on each of the articles on the Dalai lamas as well as other lamas, it's usage is variable and three boxes now exist which could be used. I've made a suggestion there which I think will fix this and expand that template's usage. Thanks.-- Alf melmac 21:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I need the original HTML script for creating this infobox template. This is because I am trying to build a similar template in Sanskrit Wikipedia. So the HTML script of this template would be useful. -- Johnxxx9 ( talk) 15:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was not done. Skomorokh 11:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Infobox monarch → Template:Infobox constitutional monarch — This requested move is in lieu of a deletion proposal. I do not think this template should be implemented universally for all "monarchs". In fact, I would like to delete it from a great many pages on pre-modern monarchs. Perhaps it would be best deleted from all article, but I don't care about modern monarchs enough to look into it. So, I propose a re-purposing of this template, specifically a restriction on its use, indicated by the renaming. Here are the reasons:
— Srnec ( talk) 18:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
What's up with the "heir" field? It just floats there, for no apparent reason, between predecessor and successor, and has no label, so readers aren't going to know what it is. PS: Isn't there some other term to use than "predecessor"? That word actually means "one who died before" so it is not an accurate term to use in all cases (e.g., abdications, no-fatal usurpings, etc.) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 20:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
It's so dark it makes blue links quite hard to read, see e.g. Genghis Khan. I think people with some flavour of colour-blindness (as well as people printing it down in black and white) might be unable to read them at all. ― A. di M. plé dréachtaí 09:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
{{ Infobox monarch}} | {{ Infobox monarch/sandbox}} | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Hello,
Suggesting 'Issue' to replace 'Offspring', per Template:Infobox royalty wordings.
Thanks.इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 09:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Can someone please tell me what the difference is between "offspring" and "children" and why we need two separate categories in the box to cover this information? -- Folantin ( talk) 08:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
At some point issue was renamed children. Of course, all the articles that use "issue" now don't display children. StarryGrandma ( talk) 21:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
data8 = {{{birth_name<includeonly>|{{{birth name|}}}</includeonly>}}}
data33 = {{{issue<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}} {{{offspring<includeonly>|</includeonly>}}}
First, there are 2535 articles which use this template. After the change from "issue" to "children" most of those infoboxes no longer display the children. Any change has to be backward compatible and preserve what is already out there. So that we can see the children again in the infoboxes on those pages I am changing back, but keeping "children" as an alternative so we don't lose anything with that field.
List of articles using Template:Infobox monarch
Second, "issue" is the standard British English in formal lists of children of royalty. See Template:Infobox royalty and Template:Infobox noble. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National_varieties of English we don't edit articles to change from one variety of English to another. For example, an article that starts out using the spelling colour should not be edited to change it to the American version, color.
StarryGrandma ( talk) 01:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
All these unique fields better be added Template:Infobox royalty. -- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 06:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
When this template appears in articles, the merge notice says "See templates for discussion" and links to the non-existent section: 2013_July_13#template:Infobox_monarch. It should link to 2013_July_13#template:Infobox_royalty. Nurg ( talk) 05:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Infobox monarchy which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 17:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)