From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naming

Wonder if it would be tighter and more elegant to title this template "Horses of India" - given that the partbreds, types and formal breeds are all included. Thoughts? Montanabw (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC) reply

I thought about it, and felt that consistency with all the other templates of this type was as good a criterion as any; I don't feel strongly about it, it really doesn't much matter what a template is called. The displayed name is "Horse breeds and types of India", for just the reasons you mention. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Maybe the display could just say "Horses of India" , not moving the template itself? You are right about precision, but it looks clunky. Montanabw (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naming

Wonder if it would be tighter and more elegant to title this template "Horses of India" - given that the partbreds, types and formal breeds are all included. Thoughts? Montanabw (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC) reply

I thought about it, and felt that consistency with all the other templates of this type was as good a criterion as any; I don't feel strongly about it, it really doesn't much matter what a template is called. The displayed name is "Horse breeds and types of India", for just the reasons you mention. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Maybe the display could just say "Horses of India" , not moving the template itself? You are right about precision, but it looks clunky. Montanabw (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook