 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Hershey Bar → Template:WikiLove - chocolate bar — This should not promote the Hershey Corporation. Wikipedia should not be seen to be endorsing Hershey or its particular chocolate bars. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 05:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- OpposeIt isn't pushing Hershey, Just like a Have A Coke WikiLove template wouldn't.
- I don't see a "Have a Coke" template. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 06:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, if at all, the users endorse it. --
The Evil IP address (
talk)
11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- What about WP:NOTADVERTISING ? 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 10:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose and create {{
Nestle Crunch}} to avoid appearance of favoritism. –
Lionel (
talk)
08:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's another reason to move this to chocolate bar, since you're just going to add redundant templates. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 08:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Any additional comments:
This template isn't actually about the encyclopedic topic of the Hershey bar... shouldn't this name be reserved for that? (ie, shouldn't all WikiLove templates be prepended with "WikiLove"? ) 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 08:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Hershey Bar → Template:WikiLove - chocolate bar — This should not promote the Hershey Corporation. Wikipedia should not be seen to be endorsing Hershey or its particular chocolate bars. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 05:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- OpposeIt isn't pushing Hershey, Just like a Have A Coke WikiLove template wouldn't.
- I don't see a "Have a Coke" template. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 06:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, if at all, the users endorse it. --
The Evil IP address (
talk)
11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- What about WP:NOTADVERTISING ? 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 10:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose and create {{
Nestle Crunch}} to avoid appearance of favoritism. –
Lionel (
talk)
08:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's another reason to move this to chocolate bar, since you're just going to add redundant templates. 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 08:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Any additional comments:
This template isn't actually about the encyclopedic topic of the Hershey bar... shouldn't this name be reserved for that? (ie, shouldn't all WikiLove templates be prepended with "WikiLove"? ) 70.24.251.71 ( talk) 08:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.