This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
I created a separate terminology heading after Thumperward removed the magnet category.
Bpringlemeir 04:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Software
The intent is to give a flavor of gnutella clients. I don't think that an exhaustive list should be put in the navbox. I have culled the list by only including original software. Ie, gnutella clients that aren't a fork (or are the only actively maintained version). The software link for the group heading was more obvious originally (but looked ugly). I concur with
User:Thumperward to keep the list in alpha order.
Bpringlemeir (
talk) 00:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I also now wonder if ultra-peer capable software should be listed seperately. This software forms the back-bone of the Gnutella network. I would be for a way of differentiating the ultra-capable nodes from those that are not in this template.
Bpringlemeir (
talk) 04:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
There aren't so many servent links that we need to separate them out, and to my knowledge all the mainstream servents have ultrapeer capability these days anyway.
Chris Cunningham (
talk) 08:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
I created a separate terminology heading after Thumperward removed the magnet category.
Bpringlemeir 04:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Software
The intent is to give a flavor of gnutella clients. I don't think that an exhaustive list should be put in the navbox. I have culled the list by only including original software. Ie, gnutella clients that aren't a fork (or are the only actively maintained version). The software link for the group heading was more obvious originally (but looked ugly). I concur with
User:Thumperward to keep the list in alpha order.
Bpringlemeir (
talk) 00:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I also now wonder if ultra-peer capable software should be listed seperately. This software forms the back-bone of the Gnutella network. I would be for a way of differentiating the ultra-capable nodes from those that are not in this template.
Bpringlemeir (
talk) 04:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply
There aren't so many servent links that we need to separate them out, and to my knowledge all the mainstream servents have ultrapeer capability these days anyway.
Chris Cunningham (
talk) 08:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)reply