This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This page should not be speedy deleted because... a) the template is well-designed and well-used and b) the editor making this request has decided to blank this page and replace all instances of the template with one of their own design. I cry foul, if you will. --
Madcynic (
talk)
09:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
I agree, the new template is full of redlinks, unlike the current one. No need for a new template when this one could quite easily have been altered to include any additional links.
Calistemon (
talk)
00:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This page should not be speedy deleted because... a) the template is well-designed and well-used and b) the editor making this request has decided to blank this page and replace all instances of the template with one of their own design. I cry foul, if you will. --
Madcynic (
talk)
09:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
I agree, the new template is full of redlinks, unlike the current one. No need for a new template when this one could quite easily have been altered to include any additional links.
Calistemon (
talk)
00:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)reply