- For anything from November 2007 to August 2009, see: User:Calistemon1/Archive
- For anything from August 2009 to 31 December 2010, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 1
- For anything from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 2
- For anything from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 3
- For anything from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2015, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 4
- For anything from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 5
- For anything from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 6
- For anything from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 7
Calistemon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
There are westdales everywhere, as for west dale the trove refs tend to have beverly as a qualifier, sigh... JarrahTree 05:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ JarrahTree: Both Landgate and Nationalmap maps have the locality as Westdale. We had two wikidata items for it as well, which I merged. Less clear is Kokeby, Western Australia and Mount Kokeby, Western Australia, in the same shire. Two ore one place? Two wikidata items for now. Calistemon ( talk) 08:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- The kokeby certainly the same... JarrahTree 09:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is now on the State Register of Heritage Places, although I'm unsure if its the entire pipeline. The map on the inHerit entry confused me; it has just highlighted a square in Merredin. I'll leave it up to you to update the lists.
Djuringe Mooranoppin in Kellerberrin has also been added to the register recently, see [1] and [2]. Steelkamp ( talk) 08:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @ Steelkamp:, going throught the lists and updating them is on my to do list as the next item. Calistemon ( talk) 10:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- GWSS listing :is intriguing:
Location Details
Contains the main reservoirs: Mundaring Weir (Dam) and Mount Charlotte Reservoir; the main conduit of the pipeline (including all locking bar pipe, wood stave pipe and continuously welded pipe) which stretches 560km from Mundaring in the west to Kalgoorlie in the east; the remaining six of the eight original pump stations (Nos 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8) including remaining equipment; the remaining four associated holding tanks (located at Steam Pump Stations Nos, 2, 4, 7 and 8); and the four regulating tanks located at Bakers Hill, West Northam; Bullabulling and Toorak Hill
That is a lot of stuff in the location JarrahTree 11:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess they had to list it under a location and the place of origin was probably the best option. The child places are then registered under their respective location, No. 6 Steam Pumping Station (fmr), Ghooli under Yilgarn, No 3 Pumping Station under Cunderdin, and so on.
Calistemon (
talk) 11:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- but the totality of all the different lga's ! there is a lot that it is all in
JarrahTree 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ Steelkamp and JarrahTree: Interesting that the Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is listed under the Shire of Mundaring on the entry but also appears on the Kellerberrin State heritage list as well as on the Yilgarn one. Without having checking all of the ones it runs through right now I suspect it is listed under all of them, which would make perfect sense. Calistemon ( talk) 12:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- but the totality of all the different lga's ! there is a lot that it is all in
JarrahTree 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess they had to list it under a location and the place of origin was probably the best option. The child places are then registered under their respective location, No. 6 Steam Pumping Station (fmr), Ghooli under Yilgarn, No 3 Pumping Station under Cunderdin, and so on.
Calistemon (
talk) 11:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Northern Territory Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 ( talk) 21:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SV Oberachern.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TSV Aubstadt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey Calistemon, I have taken some photos of the Beckenham tunnel for the Thornlie line, which I have added to the Thornlie line article. These photos are taken from the Dulwich Street level crossing and the Albany Highway bridge. Problem is I just use my phone camera, which is not good for zoomed in photos. I was wondering if you would be able to take better photos than me? That would be really useful for the Thornlie line article which I am working on. Steelkamp ( talk) 05:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: It's a little out of the way from my usual "photographic range" around Rockingham, Kwinana and Cockburn. In the next few weeks I probably won't be able to go up there because of work and family commitments. At some point, after that, I would probably be able to just catch the train, take my bike and go on a photo trip. So, sadly, not right now but maybe in a few weeks time.
Calistemon (
talk) 05:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. This isn't urgent. A few weeks won't hurt. I just want to get the Dulwich Street level crossing one done before the Armadale line shutdown on 20 November, as that area is going to be elevated. If you can't get that photo by then, please let me know. Thanks,
Steelkamp (
talk) 05:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ Steelkamp: Will try but just send me a reminder in 4 weeks time. I got family visiting from Europe so I'm going to be tied down a bit until then. Calistemon ( talk) 06:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. This isn't urgent. A few weeks won't hurt. I just want to get the Dulwich Street level crossing one done before the Armadale line shutdown on 20 November, as that area is going to be elevated. If you can't get that photo by then, please let me know. Thanks,
Steelkamp (
talk) 05:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: Do you still require the images? If yes, I may have an opportunity to go there today.
Calistemon (
talk) 23:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes please, I do.
Steelkamp (
talk) 23:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: I have placed the images I have taken today in
Commons:Category:October 2023 in rail transport in Western Australia but I'm a little skeptical as to whether they are good enough to use. There was a fair bit of heat coming off the track, making them a bit blurred. Have a look and see what you think.
Calistemon (
talk) 10:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've added File:Armadale Line viewed from pedestrian crossing near Beckenham Station, Western Australia, October 2023 08.jpg to the Thornlie line article. Its better than the previous photo and the heat distortion isn't bad at the size used in the article. The tunnel is now easily visible. Thanks for the photos! Steelkamp ( talk) 02:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: I have placed the images I have taken today in
Commons:Category:October 2023 in rail transport in Western Australia but I'm a little skeptical as to whether they are good enough to use. There was a fair bit of heat coming off the track, making them a bit blurred. Have a look and see what you think.
Calistemon (
talk) 10:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes please, I do.
Steelkamp (
talk) 23:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
I was corrected in my misunderstanding of the development of government lines in the bunbury region - please see my notes on an emailed pdf... it should explain most of the oddities
- Picton to Boyanup - was an isolated line between 1887-1891
- Perth to Bunbury - was connected in 1893
- Boyanup to Busselton - was connected in 1894 during the Forrest era public works construction
- Boyanup was 1894-1920s signposted as 'Boyanup Junction'
- Boyanup Junction was the final point of the Flinders Bay line, technically from the 1920s to the 1950s...
I was able to access 1900 era maps of the era, might add to commons to use... apologies that I had misled you - I got quite a few things wrong!!! JarrahTree 11:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries, hope you are trying to update the relevant articles, where required. Calistemon ( talk) 11:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- I hope to correct my mistakes. I am also hoping to ascertain which of the annual report items might be useful or not. However, I am always slow on the uptake. JarrahTree 11:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:RC Luxembourg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TSV Schott Mainz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Somebody FINALLY got around to uploading to Wikimedia Commons a logo identical to one you uploaded here yonks ago.
The file File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
a logo identical to this .jpg exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1._FC_Bruchsal.png
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Oona Wikiwalker (
talk) 01:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:List_of_State_Register_of_Heritage_Places_in_the_Shire_of_Wyalkatchem&oldid=1015776335 intriguing it didnt get picked up then - trust you are having a safe easter wherever you are JarrahTree 06:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- For anything from November 2007 to August 2009, see: User:Calistemon1/Archive
- For anything from August 2009 to 31 December 2010, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 1
- For anything from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 2
- For anything from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 3
- For anything from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2015, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 4
- For anything from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 5
- For anything from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 6
- For anything from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022, see: User:Calistemon/Archive 7
Calistemon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
There are westdales everywhere, as for west dale the trove refs tend to have beverly as a qualifier, sigh... JarrahTree 05:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ JarrahTree: Both Landgate and Nationalmap maps have the locality as Westdale. We had two wikidata items for it as well, which I merged. Less clear is Kokeby, Western Australia and Mount Kokeby, Western Australia, in the same shire. Two ore one place? Two wikidata items for now. Calistemon ( talk) 08:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- The kokeby certainly the same... JarrahTree 09:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is now on the State Register of Heritage Places, although I'm unsure if its the entire pipeline. The map on the inHerit entry confused me; it has just highlighted a square in Merredin. I'll leave it up to you to update the lists.
Djuringe Mooranoppin in Kellerberrin has also been added to the register recently, see [1] and [2]. Steelkamp ( talk) 08:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @ Steelkamp:, going throught the lists and updating them is on my to do list as the next item. Calistemon ( talk) 10:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- GWSS listing :is intriguing:
Location Details
Contains the main reservoirs: Mundaring Weir (Dam) and Mount Charlotte Reservoir; the main conduit of the pipeline (including all locking bar pipe, wood stave pipe and continuously welded pipe) which stretches 560km from Mundaring in the west to Kalgoorlie in the east; the remaining six of the eight original pump stations (Nos 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8) including remaining equipment; the remaining four associated holding tanks (located at Steam Pump Stations Nos, 2, 4, 7 and 8); and the four regulating tanks located at Bakers Hill, West Northam; Bullabulling and Toorak Hill
That is a lot of stuff in the location JarrahTree 11:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess they had to list it under a location and the place of origin was probably the best option. The child places are then registered under their respective location, No. 6 Steam Pumping Station (fmr), Ghooli under Yilgarn, No 3 Pumping Station under Cunderdin, and so on.
Calistemon (
talk) 11:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- but the totality of all the different lga's ! there is a lot that it is all in
JarrahTree 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ Steelkamp and JarrahTree: Interesting that the Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is listed under the Shire of Mundaring on the entry but also appears on the Kellerberrin State heritage list as well as on the Yilgarn one. Without having checking all of the ones it runs through right now I suspect it is listed under all of them, which would make perfect sense. Calistemon ( talk) 12:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- but the totality of all the different lga's ! there is a lot that it is all in
JarrahTree 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess they had to list it under a location and the place of origin was probably the best option. The child places are then registered under their respective location, No. 6 Steam Pumping Station (fmr), Ghooli under Yilgarn, No 3 Pumping Station under Cunderdin, and so on.
Calistemon (
talk) 11:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Northern Territory Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 ( talk) 21:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SV Oberachern.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TSV Aubstadt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey Calistemon, I have taken some photos of the Beckenham tunnel for the Thornlie line, which I have added to the Thornlie line article. These photos are taken from the Dulwich Street level crossing and the Albany Highway bridge. Problem is I just use my phone camera, which is not good for zoomed in photos. I was wondering if you would be able to take better photos than me? That would be really useful for the Thornlie line article which I am working on. Steelkamp ( talk) 05:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: It's a little out of the way from my usual "photographic range" around Rockingham, Kwinana and Cockburn. In the next few weeks I probably won't be able to go up there because of work and family commitments. At some point, after that, I would probably be able to just catch the train, take my bike and go on a photo trip. So, sadly, not right now but maybe in a few weeks time.
Calistemon (
talk) 05:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. This isn't urgent. A few weeks won't hurt. I just want to get the Dulwich Street level crossing one done before the Armadale line shutdown on 20 November, as that area is going to be elevated. If you can't get that photo by then, please let me know. Thanks,
Steelkamp (
talk) 05:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ Steelkamp: Will try but just send me a reminder in 4 weeks time. I got family visiting from Europe so I'm going to be tied down a bit until then. Calistemon ( talk) 06:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. This isn't urgent. A few weeks won't hurt. I just want to get the Dulwich Street level crossing one done before the Armadale line shutdown on 20 November, as that area is going to be elevated. If you can't get that photo by then, please let me know. Thanks,
Steelkamp (
talk) 05:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: Do you still require the images? If yes, I may have an opportunity to go there today.
Calistemon (
talk) 23:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes please, I do.
Steelkamp (
talk) 23:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: I have placed the images I have taken today in
Commons:Category:October 2023 in rail transport in Western Australia but I'm a little skeptical as to whether they are good enough to use. There was a fair bit of heat coming off the track, making them a bit blurred. Have a look and see what you think.
Calistemon (
talk) 10:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've added File:Armadale Line viewed from pedestrian crossing near Beckenham Station, Western Australia, October 2023 08.jpg to the Thornlie line article. Its better than the previous photo and the heat distortion isn't bad at the size used in the article. The tunnel is now easily visible. Thanks for the photos! Steelkamp ( talk) 02:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: I have placed the images I have taken today in
Commons:Category:October 2023 in rail transport in Western Australia but I'm a little skeptical as to whether they are good enough to use. There was a fair bit of heat coming off the track, making them a bit blurred. Have a look and see what you think.
Calistemon (
talk) 10:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes please, I do.
Steelkamp (
talk) 23:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
I was corrected in my misunderstanding of the development of government lines in the bunbury region - please see my notes on an emailed pdf... it should explain most of the oddities
- Picton to Boyanup - was an isolated line between 1887-1891
- Perth to Bunbury - was connected in 1893
- Boyanup to Busselton - was connected in 1894 during the Forrest era public works construction
- Boyanup was 1894-1920s signposted as 'Boyanup Junction'
- Boyanup Junction was the final point of the Flinders Bay line, technically from the 1920s to the 1950s...
I was able to access 1900 era maps of the era, might add to commons to use... apologies that I had misled you - I got quite a few things wrong!!! JarrahTree 11:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries, hope you are trying to update the relevant articles, where required. Calistemon ( talk) 11:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- I hope to correct my mistakes. I am also hoping to ascertain which of the annual report items might be useful or not. However, I am always slow on the uptake. JarrahTree 11:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:RC Luxembourg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TSV Schott Mainz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Somebody FINALLY got around to uploading to Wikimedia Commons a logo identical to one you uploaded here yonks ago.
The file File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
a logo identical to this .jpg exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1._FC_Bruchsal.png
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Oona Wikiwalker (
talk) 01:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:List_of_State_Register_of_Heritage_Places_in_the_Shire_of_Wyalkatchem&oldid=1015776335 intriguing it didnt get picked up then - trust you are having a safe easter wherever you are JarrahTree 06:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)