This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
The template at the moment has almost half redlinks. Some are synonyms of other names, and can be fixed simply by creating the appropriate redirect to the other name. Others are missing articles; instead of deleting their redlinks, please turn them into articles. The template is not yet used on any pages, so redlinks won't be bothering anyone who shouldn't be bothered. -- Una Smith ( talk) 09:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Seems there is no need for two templates for both extinct and living species templates, seems one template with different categories can do both. Montanabw (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Should junior synonyms be included in this navbox, or omitted? I think I would prefer to include them, but perhaps flag them in some way as synonyms. -- Una Smith ( talk) 00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I personally have long loathed the awkwardness of the "extinct" and "extant" wording at the top (the user who insisted upon it was ultimately blocked a couple years ago and I hate to dredge this all up again, but...). I think all the extinct species have that little + sign by them, so IMHO, just chopping that and replacing it with a little key indicating that the ones with a + are extinct (or whatever) is neater and more elegant. Montanabw (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Wondering if we could or should merge {{ Equidae extinct nav}} into this one. I don't really know which way to go, as far as the ancestral (and proposed but now rejected) evolutionary forms. Thoughts? Discussion? Montanabw (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The sources for Selous' zebra are either unreliable or dead links. I have a hard time believing this is a real subspecies, considering I could not find any other sources that mention it. I attempted to remove it before, but others have reverted this. Ddum5347 ( talk) 02:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
The template at the moment has almost half redlinks. Some are synonyms of other names, and can be fixed simply by creating the appropriate redirect to the other name. Others are missing articles; instead of deleting their redlinks, please turn them into articles. The template is not yet used on any pages, so redlinks won't be bothering anyone who shouldn't be bothered. -- Una Smith ( talk) 09:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Seems there is no need for two templates for both extinct and living species templates, seems one template with different categories can do both. Montanabw (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Should junior synonyms be included in this navbox, or omitted? I think I would prefer to include them, but perhaps flag them in some way as synonyms. -- Una Smith ( talk) 00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I personally have long loathed the awkwardness of the "extinct" and "extant" wording at the top (the user who insisted upon it was ultimately blocked a couple years ago and I hate to dredge this all up again, but...). I think all the extinct species have that little + sign by them, so IMHO, just chopping that and replacing it with a little key indicating that the ones with a + are extinct (or whatever) is neater and more elegant. Montanabw (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Wondering if we could or should merge {{ Equidae extinct nav}} into this one. I don't really know which way to go, as far as the ancestral (and proposed but now rejected) evolutionary forms. Thoughts? Discussion? Montanabw (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The sources for Selous' zebra are either unreliable or dead links. I have a hard time believing this is a real subspecies, considering I could not find any other sources that mention it. I attempted to remove it before, but others have reverted this. Ddum5347 ( talk) 02:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)