This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could someone please edit the template to use the {{s-rail
templates? See
Sandbox-version.
Tholme (
talk)
19:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
It is an unwarranted assumption that a disused railway station is on a disused railway. The header of the central section "Disused railways" is incorrect for disused stations on lines that are currently in use. I suggest that it be changed to "Original railways". Relevant examples: Clapham Common, Stewarts Lane railway stations; the companies that built them are long gone, but the lines they stood on are still in use.
(Why is "railways" in the plural? I do realise it is because of {{ s-rail}}, not this template, but can anything be done to make it singular?) -- Verbarson talk edits 22:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
Disused rail start}}
/{{
Disused Rail Insert}}
for the pre-grouping owner/operator of closed lines, and {{
Historical Rail Start}}
/{{
Historical Rail Insert}}
to show the pre-grouping owner/operator of lines that are still in use. We don't need more. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could someone please edit the template to use the {{s-rail
templates? See
Sandbox-version.
Tholme (
talk)
19:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
It is an unwarranted assumption that a disused railway station is on a disused railway. The header of the central section "Disused railways" is incorrect for disused stations on lines that are currently in use. I suggest that it be changed to "Original railways". Relevant examples: Clapham Common, Stewarts Lane railway stations; the companies that built them are long gone, but the lines they stood on are still in use.
(Why is "railways" in the plural? I do realise it is because of {{ s-rail}}, not this template, but can anything be done to make it singular?) -- Verbarson talk edits 22:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
Disused rail start}}
/{{
Disused Rail Insert}}
for the pre-grouping owner/operator of closed lines, and {{
Historical Rail Start}}
/{{
Historical Rail Insert}}
to show the pre-grouping owner/operator of lines that are still in use. We don't need more. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)