The result was: promoted by
Panyd
The muffin is not subtle
Created by Epipelagic ( talk). Self nom at 23:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
Article
Comments/discussion: All but two references are from the institute's own website, and the other two references are from the website of an aquarium the institute operates. The article needs third-party, independent sources (mainly to establish notability, but also just because that's the only way to be sure there's good, reliable information in the article). I won't go as far as to challenge notability on the article itself yet, because I don't know what the notability standards and guidelines are for research institutes (that is to say, I don't know what sorts of references would be expected to demonstrate that a research institute is notable on Wikipedia), but in any case the article as it is is not suitable for DYK. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 00:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
I put the icon up in the review template before; just adding one down here to make it clear that I consider this nomination rejected.
rʨanaɢ (
talk)
19:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Panyd
The muffin is not subtle
Created by Epipelagic ( talk). Self nom at 23:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
Article
Comments/discussion: All but two references are from the institute's own website, and the other two references are from the website of an aquarium the institute operates. The article needs third-party, independent sources (mainly to establish notability, but also just because that's the only way to be sure there's good, reliable information in the article). I won't go as far as to challenge notability on the article itself yet, because I don't know what the notability standards and guidelines are for research institutes (that is to say, I don't know what sorts of references would be expected to demonstrate that a research institute is notable on Wikipedia), but in any case the article as it is is not suitable for DYK. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 00:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
I put the icon up in the review template before; just adding one down here to make it clear that I consider this nomination rejected.
rʨanaɢ (
talk)
19:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)