This template was considered for deletion on 28 February 2021. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Template:Collapse_bottom was copied or moved into incubator:Template:Wp/nod/collapse_bottom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Lists Template‑class | |||||||
|
{{
editprotected}}
Please change ''The above....'' to ''{{{1|The above....}}}'' so that the message can be specified, just like {{
Collapse top}}, especially when it is not a "discussion" that has been collapsed.
Also, or alternatively seeing as {{ Collapse top}} does not allow the corresponding text to be changed, change the (default) text to "The above content has been placed in a collapse box for improved usability.", which is identical to the text from {{ Collapse top}} except for "above". Mark Hurd ( talk) 09:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
There is a "|}" at the top of the article. Do they serve a purpose? – S. Rich ( talk) 00:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
@ NJA: please revert [1], it breaks the template. See #Fix stray characters above. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 02:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Collapse bottom has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
<noinclude>{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=Hidden archive bottom}}</noinclude>
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 03:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This page gets listed in
Special:LintErrors/stripped-tag because of having |}</div>
without the balancing <div>{|
tags. Functionally this is correct since this template is paired with {{
Collapse top}} which has the opening tags. So a div and table tag wrapped in noincude needs to be added to remove the page off Linter report.
So in the first line, replace |}</div><noinclude>
with <noinclude><div>{|</noinclude>|}</div><noinclude>
You can see in Template:Collapse bottom/sandbox that this works. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ ( talk) 06:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly>
I have updated the sandbox with this. You can check testcases that it works. It won't change the template function and removes page from Linter list.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (
talk) 11:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi everyone! I was emailed a request to edit this article and replace line 1 from:
<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
<div><includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
Is this change necessary? I'm posting this message on behalf of the user that emailed this to me. :-) Thanks for looking - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
<div>
and <includeonly>
tags. I'm still trying to figure out why the extra <div>
tag is necessary and being requested in the first place (as well as the </div>
tag, if it's even an extra one at all)... I'm also trying to find the original email that was sent to me about this as well...<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
<includeonly><div>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
</div>
here complements the opening div tag in {{
collapse top}}. — Alexis Jazz (
talk or ping me) 13:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please edit the comment, on the third line of the code, replacing the current with the following:
Per title, when replying in a thread using the visual Reply Tool, which auto-indents markup with :
, {{
cot}} seems to function with an arbitrary number of preceding ::::
but {{
cob}} gets incorrectly parsed, resulting in all subsequent text being hatted. Going into markup and removing the indents from the template resolves the issue, but in any case any hatted text will not be indented at the same level with one's reply, disrupting reading.
SamuelRiv (
talk) 03:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This template was considered for deletion on 28 February 2021. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Template:Collapse_bottom was copied or moved into incubator:Template:Wp/nod/collapse_bottom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Lists Template‑class | |||||||
|
{{
editprotected}}
Please change ''The above....'' to ''{{{1|The above....}}}'' so that the message can be specified, just like {{
Collapse top}}, especially when it is not a "discussion" that has been collapsed.
Also, or alternatively seeing as {{ Collapse top}} does not allow the corresponding text to be changed, change the (default) text to "The above content has been placed in a collapse box for improved usability.", which is identical to the text from {{ Collapse top}} except for "above". Mark Hurd ( talk) 09:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
There is a "|}" at the top of the article. Do they serve a purpose? – S. Rich ( talk) 00:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
@ NJA: please revert [1], it breaks the template. See #Fix stray characters above. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 02:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Collapse bottom has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
<noinclude>{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=Hidden archive bottom}}</noinclude>
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 03:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This page gets listed in
Special:LintErrors/stripped-tag because of having |}</div>
without the balancing <div>{|
tags. Functionally this is correct since this template is paired with {{
Collapse top}} which has the opening tags. So a div and table tag wrapped in noincude needs to be added to remove the page off Linter report.
So in the first line, replace |}</div><noinclude>
with <noinclude><div>{|</noinclude>|}</div><noinclude>
You can see in Template:Collapse bottom/sandbox that this works. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ ( talk) 06:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly>
I have updated the sandbox with this. You can check testcases that it works. It won't change the template function and removes page from Linter list.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (
talk) 11:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi everyone! I was emailed a request to edit this article and replace line 1 from:
<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
<div><includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
Is this change necessary? I'm posting this message on behalf of the user that emailed this to me. :-) Thanks for looking - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
<div>
and <includeonly>
tags. I'm still trying to figure out why the extra <div>
tag is necessary and being requested in the first place (as well as the </div>
tag, if it's even an extra one at all)... I'm also trying to find the original email that was sent to me about this as well...<includeonly>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
<includeonly><div>|}</div></includeonly><noinclude>
</div>
here complements the opening div tag in {{
collapse top}}. — Alexis Jazz (
talk or ping me) 13:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please edit the comment, on the third line of the code, replacing the current with the following:
Per title, when replying in a thread using the visual Reply Tool, which auto-indents markup with :
, {{
cot}} seems to function with an arbitrary number of preceding ::::
but {{
cob}} gets incorrectly parsed, resulting in all subsequent text being hatted. Going into markup and removing the indents from the template resolves the issue, but in any case any hatted text will not be indented at the same level with one's reply, disrupting reading.
SamuelRiv (
talk) 03:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)